search for: werschlein

> On 02.11.2015, at 20:25, Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 02/11/15 17:08, Thomas Werschlein wrote: >>> On 02.11.2015, at 16:25, Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Well he didn't write what I asked for, can you please post your entire smb.conf, please do not use testparm, please post as is (although you can sanitise any sens...

Hello, Just started to use Capistrano for deployment and everything works beautifully and as advertised. Thanks Jamis for this great piece of software. However, in my case, the deploy task takes quite some time since my SVN repository resides on a different continent than my app/db server and I''ve frozen all the rails code in the vendor dir and checked in. All in all my app sums up to

...down slightly. This option is enabled (i.e. smbd will follow symbolic links) by default. Default: follow symlinks = yes So again.. Your setup is incorrect, if you wont look/read.. well, you on your own then. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: Thomas Werschlein [mailto:thomas.werschlein at geo.uzh.ch] > Verzonden: woensdag 4 november 2015 17:31 > Aan: L.P.H. van Belle > CC: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] widelinks_warning - but unix extensions *are* off > > This is getting nowhere ... > > man smb.conf yourself:...

...mb.conf.. wide links = yes is in you GLOBAL smb.conf and not in the share.. Review your setup again, you have configuation errors! man smb.conf Its all there.. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Thomas Werschlein > Verzonden: woensdag 4 november 2015 15:58 > Aan: Rowland Penny > CC: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] widelinks_warning - but unix extensions *are* off > > > > On 03.11.2015, at 11:50, Thomas Werschlein > <thomas.werschlein at geo.uzh.ch> wrote:...

..."create mask" is only intended for files (and we don't expect permission changes when modifiying metadata anyway, do we?). Is this a bug or a misconfiguration on our side? I am happy to file a bug report, if it turns out to be one. Any thoughts? Thanks in advance, Thomas -- Thomas Werschlein, IT Services Department of Geography, University of Zurich Office: Y25-L12, Tel: +41 (0)44 63-56536 PGP-Key-ID: C76C851B

> On 29 Oct 2015, at 23:22, Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 05:27:49PM +0100, Thomas Werschlein wrote: >> Hi all >> >> Since we changed our installation from Samba 3.x to 4.x (currently 4.2.5 on Solaris 11.1), we repeatedly encounter the following 'widelinks_warning', originating from Windows Server 2012 R2 RDS clients: >> >> [2015/10/29 15:50:38.837702...

...spronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Rowland Penny > Verzonden: vrijdag 30 oktober 2015 11:46 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] widelinks_warning - but unix extensions *are* off > > On 30/10/15 10:25, Thomas Werschlein wrote: > > > >> On 29 Oct 2015, at 23:22, Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org> wrote: > >> > >> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 05:27:49PM +0100, Thomas Werschlein wrote: > >>> Hi all > >>> > >>> Since we changed our installation from...

...>> Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Rowland Penny >> Verzonden: vrijdag 30 oktober 2015 11:46 >> Aan: samba at lists.samba.org >> Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] widelinks_warning - but unix extensions *are* off >> >> On 30/10/15 10:25, Thomas Werschlein wrote: >>> >>>> On 29 Oct 2015, at 23:22, Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 05:27:49PM +0100, Thomas Werschlein wrote: >>>>> Hi all >>>>> >>>>> Since we change...

Hi all Since we changed our installation from Samba 3.x to 4.x (currently 4.2.5 on Solaris 11.1), we repeatedly encounter the following 'widelinks_warning', originating from Windows Server 2012 R2 RDS clients: [2015/10/29 15:50:38.837702, 0] ../source3/param/loadparm.c:4306(widelinks_warning) Share 'data' has wide links and unix extensions enabled. These parameters are

Hi, On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 05:58:45PM +0200, Thomas Werschlein wrote: > Is this a bug or a misconfiguration on our side? I am happy to file > a bug report, if it turns out to be one. Any thoughts? sounds like a bug to me. Can you please file a bugreport so we can track this? -Ralph -- SerNet GmbH, Bahnhofsallee 1b, 37081 Göttingen phone: +49-551-3700...

On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 05:27:49PM +0100, Thomas Werschlein wrote: > Hi all > > Since we changed our installation from Samba 3.x to 4.x (currently 4.2.5 on Solaris 11.1), we repeatedly encounter the following 'widelinks_warning', originating from Windows Server 2012 R2 RDS clients: > > [2015/10/29 15:50:38.837702, 0] ../source3/par...

...th/auth_winbind.c as it used to be) did "fix" it for us and brought back the cross-domain support we currently depend on. This is not to say that Samba is wrong: the reasoning for patch 9817 sounds obvious after all. But somehow it does not work for our peculiar setup. Thomas -- Thomas Werschlein, IT Service Management Department of Geography, University of Zurich PGP-Key-ID: C76C851B

> On 02.11.2015, at 16:25, Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com> wrote: > > Well he didn't write what I asked for, can you please post your entire smb.conf, please do not use testparm, please post as is (although you can sanitise any sensitive info) Sorry, missed that part. Here we go. Regards, Thomas [global] available = yes smb2 leases = yes

Dear all Is there a way to stop a running scrub on a zfs pool? Same question applies to a running resilver. Both render our fileserver unusable due to massive CPU load so we''d like to postpone them. In the docs it says that resilvering and scrubbing survive a reboot, so I am not even sure if a reboot would stop scrubbing or resilvering. Any help greatly appreciated! Cheers, Thomas

On 02/11/15 17:08, Thomas Werschlein wrote: >> On 02.11.2015, at 16:25, Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Well he didn't write what I asked for, can you please post your entire smb.conf, please do not use testparm, please post as is (although you can sanitise any sensitive info) &...

... pretty obvious, isn''t it? Because you end up with a Request model and hence @request instance variables - and there you go: marvellous clash with the controller environment that is established in instance variables ... such as @request. After renaming my model to ''Inquiry'' everything just worked fine. Stupid as I am, that insight took me some time to figure out, so