search for: werr_no_logon_serv

Displaying 18 results from an estimated 18 matches for "werr_no_logon_serv".

2019 Feb 27
4
status on samba trusts
...ted encryption types on local TDO. >> Validating outgoing trust... >> OK: LocalValidation: DC[\\WIN-0ENAIPFH11A.testad1.company.com] >> CONNECTION[WERR_OK] TRUST[WERR_OK] VERIFY_STATUS_RETURNED >> Validating incoming trust... >> ERROR: RemoteValidation: DC[] CONNECTION[WERR_NO_LOGON_SERVERS] >> TRUST[WERR_NO_LOGON_SERVERS] VERIFY_STATUS_RETURNED > >> root at testad2dc:/var/log/samba# samba-tool domain trust validate testad1 >> LocalDomain Netbios[TESTAD2] DNS[testad2.company.com] >> SID[S-1-5-21-1012147493-3366197983-1829854343] >> LocalTDO Netbios...
2014 Oct 09
3
Samba4 as BDC on a Win2003 AD_PDC
...request" This is the output on log.samba when I try to create or modify an user by RSAT connected on Samba 4 [2014/10/09 09:36:29.901189, 0] ../source4/dsdb/repl/drepl_ridalloc.c:43(drepl_new_rid_pool_callback) ../source4/dsdb/repl/drepl_ridalloc.c:43: RID Manager failed RID allocation - WERR_NO_LOGON_SERVERS - extended_ret[0x0] And, this message is output on log.samba all the time: [2014/10/09 09:37:00.527471, 0] ../source4/librpc/rpc/dcerpc_util.c:681(dcerpc_pipe_auth_recv) Failed to bind to uuid e3514235-4b06-11d1-ab04-00c04fc2dcd2 for e3514235-4b06-11d1-ab04-00c04fc2dcd2 at ncacn_ip_tcp:e50...
2019 Feb 21
2
status on samba trusts
Hi, Having read the release notes on the status of trusts within samba, we see for 4.9 > "improved support for trusted domains" but we also always see these messages: > "Both sides of the trust need to fully trust each other!" and > "DCs of domain A can grant domain admin rights in domain B" What we would like to achieve is a one-way incoming trust
2019 Jul 19
0
replication stuck?
...t of each type): ==== INBOUND NEIGHBORS ==== DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=samba,DC=lindenberg,DC=one Default-First-Site-Name\BOA via RPC DSA object GUID: a0c6a86f-61da-4b05-8510-5d7af2cc34b7 Last attempt @ Fri Jul 19 16:46:13 2019 CEST failed, result 1311 (WERR_NO_LOGON_SERVERS) 709 consecutive failure(s). Last success @ NTTIME(0) ? ==== OUTBOUND NEIGHBORS ==== DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=samba,DC=lindenberg,DC=one Default-First-Site-Name\BOA via RPC DSA object GUID: a0c6a86f-61da-4b05-8510-5d7af2cc34b7...
2024 Jan 06
0
Problem create trust between Samba AD and MS Windows AD.
...=both --create-location=both -U truster at ADWIN.LOC Trust is built, but a validation error occurs. Validating outgoing trust... OK: LocalValidation: DC[\\dc01.adwin.loc] CONNECTION[WERR_OK] TRUST[WERR_OK] VERIFY_STATUS_RETURNED Validating incoming trust... ERROR: RemoteValidation: DC[] CONNECTION[WERR_NO_LOGON_SERVERS] TRUST[WERR_NO_LOGON_SERVERS] VERIFY_STATUS_RETURNED As a result, on PC entered into the SMBUB.TEST, you can login with an account from the ADWIN.LOC, but on PC entered into the ADWIN.LO it's impossible to login with a user from the SMBUB.TEST domain. I'm installed updates in the ADWIN...
2024 Jan 19
0
Problem create trust between Samba AD and MS Windows AD.
...=both --create-location=both -U truster at ADWIN.LOC Trust is built, but a validation error occurs. Validating outgoing trust... OK: LocalValidation: DC[\\dc01.adwin.loc] CONNECTION[WERR_OK] TRUST[WERR_OK] VERIFY_STATUS_RETURNED Validating incoming trust... ERROR: RemoteValidation: DC[] CONNECTION[WERR_NO_LOGON_SERVERS] TRUST[WERR_NO_LOGON_SERVERS] VERIFY_STATUS_RETURNED As a result, on PC entered into the SMBUB.TEST, you can login with an account from the ADWIN.LOC, but on PC entered into the ADWIN.LO it's impossible to login with a user from the SMBUB.TEST domain. I'm installed updates in the ADWIN...
2019 Jul 20
2
replication stuck?
...t of each type): ==== INBOUND NEIGHBORS ==== DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=samba,DC=lindenberg,DC=one Default-First-Site-Name\BOA via RPC DSA object GUID: a0c6a86f-61da-4b05-8510-5d7af2cc34b7 Last attempt @ Fri Jul 19 16:46:13 2019 CEST failed, result 1311 (WERR_NO_LOGON_SERVERS) 709 consecutive failure(s). Last success @ NTTIME(0) ? ==== OUTBOUND NEIGHBORS ==== DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=samba,DC=lindenberg,DC=one Default-First-Site-Name\BOA via RPC DSA object GUID: a0c6a86f-61da-4b05-8510-5d7af2cc34b7...
2019 Feb 26
0
status on samba trusts
...eated > Setting supported encryption types on local TDO. > Validating outgoing trust... > OK: LocalValidation: DC[\\WIN-0ENAIPFH11A.testad1.company.com] CONNECTION[WERR_OK] TRUST[WERR_OK] VERIFY_STATUS_RETURNED > Validating incoming trust... > ERROR: RemoteValidation: DC[] CONNECTION[WERR_NO_LOGON_SERVERS] TRUST[WERR_NO_LOGON_SERVERS] VERIFY_STATUS_RETURNED > root at testad2dc:/var/log/samba# samba-tool domain trust validate testad1 > LocalDomain Netbios[TESTAD2] DNS[testad2.company.com] SID[S-1-5-21-1012147493-3366197983-1829854343] > LocalTDO Netbios[TESTAD1] DNS[testad1.company.com]...
2019 Feb 28
2
status on samba trusts
...dating outgoing trust... >>>>> OK: LocalValidation: DC[\\WIN-0ENAIPFH11A.testad1.company.com] >>>>> CONNECTION[WERR_OK] TRUST[WERR_OK] VERIFY_STATUS_RETURNED >>>>> Validating incoming trust... >>>>> ERROR: RemoteValidation: DC[] CONNECTION[WERR_NO_LOGON_SERVERS] >>>>> TRUST[WERR_NO_LOGON_SERVERS] VERIFY_STATUS_RETURNED >>>> >>>>> root at testad2dc:/var/log/samba# samba-tool domain trust >> validate testad1 >>>>> LocalDomain Netbios[TESTAD2] DNS[testad2.company.com] >>>>> SID[...
2019 Feb 28
0
status on samba trusts
...on local TDO. >>> Validating outgoing trust... >>> OK: LocalValidation: DC[\\WIN-0ENAIPFH11A.testad1.company.com] >>> CONNECTION[WERR_OK] TRUST[WERR_OK] VERIFY_STATUS_RETURNED >>> Validating incoming trust... >>> ERROR: RemoteValidation: DC[] CONNECTION[WERR_NO_LOGON_SERVERS] >>> TRUST[WERR_NO_LOGON_SERVERS] VERIFY_STATUS_RETURNED >> >>> root at testad2dc:/var/log/samba# samba-tool domain trust validate testad1 >>> LocalDomain Netbios[TESTAD2] DNS[testad2.company.com] >>> SID[S-1-5-21-1012147493-3366197983-1829854343] >&g...
2023 Jan 08
2
Issues demoting a samba DC.
...ut that one reports successful replication, while this one (svdcm) shows errors in replication: ==== INBOUND NEIGHBORS ==== DC=tls,DC=msk,DC=ru Pereslavl-Office\SVDCP via RPC DSA object GUID: 4b38bf02-0354-44f7-b1b2-4bc8bd73784a Last attempt @ Sun Jan 8 17:15:55 2023 MSK failed, result 1311 (WERR_NO_LOGON_SERVERS) 12 consecutive failure(s). Last success @ Sun Jan 8 16:22:13 2023 MSK I'm not sure this is how things are supposed to be... :) Thanks! /mjt
2019 Feb 28
0
status on samba trusts
...gt;> Validating outgoing trust... > >>> OK: LocalValidation: DC[\\WIN-0ENAIPFH11A.testad1.company.com] > >>> CONNECTION[WERR_OK] TRUST[WERR_OK] VERIFY_STATUS_RETURNED > >>> Validating incoming trust... > >>> ERROR: RemoteValidation: DC[] CONNECTION[WERR_NO_LOGON_SERVERS] > >>> TRUST[WERR_NO_LOGON_SERVERS] VERIFY_STATUS_RETURNED > >> > >>> root at testad2dc:/var/log/samba# samba-tool domain trust > validate testad1 > >>> LocalDomain Netbios[TESTAD2] DNS[testad2.company.com] > >>> SID[S-1-5-21-101214749...
2019 Feb 28
2
status on samba trusts
...gt;>> Validating outgoing trust... >>>> OK: LocalValidation: DC[\\WIN-0ENAIPFH11A.testad1.company.com] >>>> CONNECTION[WERR_OK] TRUST[WERR_OK] VERIFY_STATUS_RETURNED >>>> Validating incoming trust... >>>> ERROR: RemoteValidation: DC[] CONNECTION[WERR_NO_LOGON_SERVERS] >>>> TRUST[WERR_NO_LOGON_SERVERS] VERIFY_STATUS_RETURNED >>> >>>> root at testad2dc:/var/log/samba# samba-tool domain trust validate >>>> testad1 >>>> LocalDomain Netbios[TESTAD2] DNS[testad2.company.com] >>>> SID[S-1-5-21-1...
2019 Mar 05
0
status on samba trusts
...trust... >>>>>> OK: LocalValidation: DC[\\WIN-0ENAIPFH11A.testad1.company.com] >>>>>> CONNECTION[WERR_OK] TRUST[WERR_OK] VERIFY_STATUS_RETURNED >>>>>> Validating incoming trust... >>>>>> ERROR: RemoteValidation: DC[] CONNECTION[WERR_NO_LOGON_SERVERS] >>>>>> TRUST[WERR_NO_LOGON_SERVERS] VERIFY_STATUS_RETURNED >>>>> >>>>>> root at testad2dc:/var/log/samba# samba-tool domain trust >>> validate testad1 >>>>>> LocalDomain Netbios[TESTAD2] DNS[testad2.company.com] >&...
2019 Oct 15
3
Problem with SPNEGO on full trust 2016 DC <> Samba 4.10.7 AD
...n resolve both DNS domains forwards and backwards and I am able to connect a Windows 10 client to the Samba domain without any issues. The problem occurs when create a full external trust between the two domains. The trust is created successfully with samba-tool however the verify fails with TRUST[WERR_NO_LOGON_SERVERS] VERIFY_STATUS_RETURNED. The end result is a trust relation that fully works with Kerberos authentication (such as logging in on the trusted domain from a domain connected to the other) but this won't work with NTLM authentication outside of it's realm. I am constantly getting this erro...
2023 Jan 08
1
Issues demoting a samba DC.
On 08/01/2023 11:04, Michael Tokarev via samba wrote: > Hello! > > I'm trying to remove a DC from our samba domain (samba 4.17.4). > It was the primary controller (with FSMO roles), - I successfully > transferred the roles to another DC.? Now it's time to demote: > > ai# samba-tool domain demote -U mjt-adm > Using svdcp.tls.msk.ru as partner server for the
2019 Oct 15
0
Problem with SPNEGO on full trust 2016 DC <> Samba 4.10.7 AD
...n resolve both DNS domains forwards and backwards and I am able to connect a Windows 10 client to the Samba domain without any issues. The problem occurs when create a full external trust between the two domains. The trust is created successfully with samba-tool however the verify fails with TRUST[WERR_NO_LOGON_SERVERS] VERIFY_STATUS_RETURNED. > > The end result is a trust relation that fully works with Kerberos authentication (such as logging in on the trusted domain from a domain connected to the other) but this won't work with NTLM authentication outside of it's realm. I am constantly getting...
2023 Jan 08
1
Issues demoting a samba DC.
...one (svdcm) shows errors in replication: > > ==== INBOUND NEIGHBORS ==== > DC=tls,DC=msk,DC=ru > ????Pereslavl-Office\SVDCP via RPC > ??????? DSA object GUID: 4b38bf02-0354-44f7-b1b2-4bc8bd73784a > ??????? Last attempt @ Sun Jan? 8 17:15:55 2023 MSK failed, result 1311 > (WERR_NO_LOGON_SERVERS) > ??????? 12 consecutive failure(s). > ??????? Last success @ Sun Jan? 8 16:22:13 2023 MSK > > I'm not sure this is how things are supposed to be... :) It isn't, but it may work if you can fix the UUID dns record, if not, we will cross that bridge when we come to it ;-)...