search for: werneck

...show_bug.cgi?id=35538 > > Other candidates: > https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36982 > https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34149 > https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26956 > https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35284 > > > On Sat, May 4, 2019 at 3:51 PM Nicolau Werneck via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> Thanks for the reply. I should say I'm actually working on 6.0, but I >> don't think this part of the code changed much since. These are traces I >> made with GDB optimizing a loop with floats and then in...

...chieve this? > > > The goal has been to eliminate the dependence on the function attributes > once all of the necessary local flags are in place. Obviously I could be > missing something, but this just seems like a bug. > > -Hal > > > Thanks, > > -- > Nicolau Werneck <nwerneck at gmail.com> > http://n <http://nwerneck.sdf.org>ic.hpavc.net > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing listllvm-dev at lists.llvm.orghttps://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev > > > -- Nicolau Werneck &...

...What would be a way to control the vectorization for `min` without having to rely on that function attribute? And furthermore, could LLVM optimizations conceivably depend only on instruction flags, and not ever on function attributes? What would be necessary to achieve this? Thanks, -- Nicolau Werneck <nwerneck at gmail.com> http://n <http://nwerneck.sdf.org>ic.hpavc.net -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20190504/8befc991/attachment.html>