Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "werbin".
Did you mean:
wenbin
2016 Aug 25
2
"plot.ts" doesn't respect the value of "pch" (+ blocked from Bugzilla signups)
...istent
with how other arguments typically passed through `plot.default` are
handled.
I'll be happy to do the patch myself -- I just need to know which thing
to patch (the source or the docs).
Greg
On 2016-08-25 03:00, David Winsemius wrote:
>> On Aug 24, 2016, at 5:59 PM, Gregory Werbin
>> <greg.werbin at libertymail.net> wrote:
>>
>> I did a search on Bugzilla for "plot.ts" and didn't find anything on
>> this issue. I tried to sign up for Bugzilla to report it, but my
>> e-mail address didn't pass your "syntax checkin...
2016 Aug 26
0
"plot.ts" doesn't respect the value of "pch" (+ blocked from Bugzilla signups)
>>>>> Gregory Werbin <greg.werbin at libertymail.net>
>>>>> on Thu, 25 Aug 2016 15:21:05 -0400 writes:
> I've had a chance to read the source more thoroughly. The chain of
> events is as follows:
> 1. Local function `plotts()` is defined with argument `cex` that...
2016 Aug 25
3
"plot.ts" doesn't respect the value of "pch" (+ blocked from Bugzilla signups)
I did a search on Bugzilla for "plot.ts" and didn't find anything on
this issue. I tried to sign up for Bugzilla to report it, but my e-mail
address didn't pass your "syntax checking" for a legal e-mail address.
The bug is easily reproducible on my machine as follows:
## start
# generate some data
y <- arima.sim(list(), 150)
# this will definitely dispatch to a
2016 Aug 25
0
"plot.ts" doesn't respect the value of "pch" (+ blocked from Bugzilla signups)
> On Aug 24, 2016, at 5:59 PM, Gregory Werbin <greg.werbin at libertymail.net> wrote:
>
> I did a search on Bugzilla for "plot.ts" and didn't find anything on this issue. I tried to sign up for Bugzilla to report it, but my e-mail address didn't pass your "syntax checking" for a legal e-mail address.
&g...
2017 Aug 04
2
Why is as.function() slower than eval(call("function"())?
(Apologies if this is better suited for R-help.)
On my system (macOS Sierra, late 2014 MacBook Pro; R 3.4.1, Homebrew build), I found that it is faster to construct a function using eval(call("function", ...)) than using as.function(list(...)). Example:
make_fn_1 <- function(a, b) eval(call("function", a, b), env = parent.frame())
make_fn_2 <- function(a, b)