search for: weneed

...it will be added to the list of packages to be installed. As we have seen with Matrix this last week, that can have downsides in stopping previously functional packages working. This is work in progress: there is no way to write a test suite that will encapsulate all the possible scenarios so weneed to get experience until 2.9.0 is released. Please report any quirks to R-devel if they are completely reproducible (and preferably with the code change needed to fix them, since the chance of anyone else being able to reproduce them are fairly slim). -- Brian D. Ripley, ripl...

Reid, Adding APR as one possible implementation of lib/System makes sense, and is what I originally suggested when I brought up the question of using APR. In particular, I agree that we want to keep APR or any other similar layer encapsulated behind lib/System. --Vikram http://www.cs.uiuc.edu/~vadve http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/ On Sep 13, 2004, at 10:34 AM, Reid Spencer wrote: > John, >

John, If we were to do this, I don't think that adding it to the LLVM source base is the right way to go. We would simply use "configure" to find the library and header files. The moment we put APR into our source base, it would be out of date. Keeping it up to date would not be fun for anyone and there's no reason for us to do that. Furthermore, this approach completely avoids