search for: weissschuh

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "weissschuh".

2019 Jul 05
2
Re: [nbdkit] [filter/nozero] large binary size with GCC 9
On Fri, 2019-07-05T08:48-0500, Eric Blake wrote: > On 7/5/19 8:21 AM, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > > On Fri, 2019-07-05T08:04-0500, Eric Blake wrote: > >> On 7/4/19 1:38 PM, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > >>> In filter/nozero a 64M large, static, zeroed, read-only array is declared. > >>> The new behavior of GCC puts this array as-is into the binary inf...
2019 Jul 05
2
Re: [nbdkit] [filter/nozero] large binary size with GCC 9
On Fri, 2019-07-05T08:04-0500, Eric Blake wrote: > On 7/4/19 1:38 PM, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > > In filter/nozero a 64M large, static, zeroed, read-only array is declared. > > The new behavior of GCC puts this array as-is into the binary inflating the > > size by a factor of around 10000. > > Odd that you are only seeing this for the nozero filter, since we...
2019 Jul 04
3
[nbdkit] [filter/nozero] large binary size with GCC 9
Hi all, It seems GCC 9 does not put read-only zero-initialized variables into the BSS section anymore; instead it is put into RODATA. (See the thread at [0], especially [1]) In filter/nozero a 64M large, static, zeroed, read-only array is declared. The new behavior of GCC puts this array as-is into the binary inflating the size by a factor of around 10000. (Clang 8 and older GCCs work