Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "weissschuh".
2019 Jul 05
2
Re: [nbdkit] [filter/nozero] large binary size with GCC 9
On Fri, 2019-07-05T08:48-0500, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 7/5/19 8:21 AM, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> > On Fri, 2019-07-05T08:04-0500, Eric Blake wrote:
> >> On 7/4/19 1:38 PM, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> >>> In filter/nozero a 64M large, static, zeroed, read-only array is declared.
> >>> The new behavior of GCC puts this array as-is into the binary inf...
2019 Jul 05
2
Re: [nbdkit] [filter/nozero] large binary size with GCC 9
On Fri, 2019-07-05T08:04-0500, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 7/4/19 1:38 PM, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> > In filter/nozero a 64M large, static, zeroed, read-only array is declared.
> > The new behavior of GCC puts this array as-is into the binary inflating the
> > size by a factor of around 10000.
>
> Odd that you are only seeing this for the nozero filter, since we...
2019 Jul 04
3
[nbdkit] [filter/nozero] large binary size with GCC 9
Hi all,
It seems GCC 9 does not put read-only zero-initialized variables into the BSS
section anymore; instead it is put into RODATA.
(See the thread at [0], especially [1])
In filter/nozero a 64M large, static, zeroed, read-only array is declared.
The new behavior of GCC puts this array as-is into the binary inflating the
size by a factor of around 10000.
(Clang 8 and older GCCs work