Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "weeee".
Did you mean:
weee
2007 Mar 29
2
Re: FLAC: same features as WavPack
...s wouldn't be ideal (just speculating here!). But if
this conversion makes sense, why not have support for it built into
FLAC? You'd get 24 bit out, which wouldn't exactly be preserving the
format, but it would at least make it possible. At a minimum its a nice
"buzz" word (weeee 32 bit float support!). Perhaps that isn't really
the scope of FLAC though.
> > The conversion to 24 bit would be a
> > problem in that case.
>
> Well, yes, clipping is a problem whether you're playing the audio so
> you can listen to it, or you're converting...
2007 Mar 30
0
FLAC support for floating point
...ulating here!).
> But if
> this conversion makes sense, why not have support for it built into
> FLAC? You'd get 24 bit out, which wouldn't exactly be preserving the
> format, but it would at least make it possible. At a minimum its a
> nice
> "buzz" word (weeee 32 bit float support!). Perhaps that isn't really
> the scope of FLAC though.
2006 Jun 01
1
link_to_remote show then hide
Hi,
I have a link_to_remote and it update a div.
After the first click the div is opened with the information.
Now I want to be able to close hide the div .
How should I do it.
Someone at the IRC told me to use toggle.
But what I want is a bit odd. I want that it will not do again
link_to_remote but toggle.
Tnx
Kfir
2006 Dec 11
1
Sampling Rate
That's pretty bad. Both DirectSoundCapture and WinMM are capable of
recording at 16kHz. I don't know why OpenAL would be incapable of
handling it. It's not like it's at all rare or new. I would try
16000 and see if it works. Maybe the docs are wrong?
Note that one option to retain high quality is to capture at a higher
rate and then downsample using a resampling
2007 Mar 31
1
Re: FLAC support for floating point
...ut if
> > this conversion makes sense, why not have support for it built into
> > FLAC? You'd get 24 bit out, which wouldn't exactly be preserving the
> > format, but it would at least make it possible. At a minimum its a
> > nice
> > "buzz" word (weeee 32 bit float support!). Perhaps that isn't really
> > the scope of FLAC though.
> When you say "why not have support for it build into FLAC," you're
> really just talking about the reference implementation of FLAC.
> Nothing is stopping you from writing your...
2007 Mar 29
4
Re: FLAC: same features as WavPack
Hello FLAC list.
As far as I know 24 bit FLAC support is broken. It often doesn't
compress the audio at all, but instead stores the chunks as verbatim
type (although the FLAC format supports 24 bit). Perhaps this is fixed?
If so, do let me know. I agree that perhaps 32 bit float/pcm isn't
entirely necessary when it comes to storing different qualities. But
when wanting to preserve