search for: wedson

Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "wedson".

Did you mean: edson
2024 Jun 07
0
[RFC PATCH 7/8] rust: add firmware abstractions
...ct device. This implements only the minimum > necessary functions required for the abstractions of firmware API; > that is, wrapping C's pointer to a device object with Rust struct only > during a caller knows the pointer is valid (e.g., the probe callback). > > Co-developed-by: Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf at gmail.com> > Signed-off-by: Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf at gmail.com> > Signed-off-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr at redhat.com> > Co-developed-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori at gmail.com> > Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujit...
2023 Apr 07
0
[PATCH v2 2/2] rust: virtio: add virtio support
Hi Wedson, Martin, First of all, thanks for the review. > > +??? /// VirtIO driver remove. > > +??? /// > > +??? /// Called when a virtio device is removed. > > +??? /// Implementers should prepare the device for complete > > removal here. > > +??? /// > > +??? //...
2024 May 30
0
[RFC PATCH 7/8] rust: add firmware abstractions
...int at a valid `device`. > > > > If the following rust code does what this comment says, then sure, I'm > > ok with it for now if it helps you all out with stuff like the firmware > > interface for the phy rust code. > > Great, thanks a lot! > > Danilo and Wedson, are there any concerns about pushing this patch [1] > for the firmware abstractions? Well, if everyone is fine with this one I don't see why we can't we go with [1] directly? AFAICS, we'd only need the following fix: -//! C header: [`include/linux/device.h`](../../../../include/li...
2024 May 30
0
[RFC PATCH 7/8] rust: add firmware abstractions
...ollowing rust code does what this comment says, then sure, I'm > >> > ok with it for now if it helps you all out with stuff like the firmware > >> > interface for the phy rust code. > >> > >> Great, thanks a lot! > >> > >> Danilo and Wedson, are there any concerns about pushing this patch [1] > >> for the firmware abstractions? > > > > Well, if everyone is fine with this one I don't see why we can't we go with [1] > > directly? AFAICS, we'd only need the following fix: > > > > -//!...
2013 Aug 29
0
[linux-linus test] 18805: regressions - FAIL
...ng Gao <wanlong.gao@gmail.com> Wanpeng Li <liwanp@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Wanpeng Li <liwp.linux@gmail.com> Wanpeng Li <liwp@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Warner Wang <warner.wang@hp.com> Warren Turkal <wt@ooyala.com> Wayne Boyer <wayneb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@gmail.com> Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com> Wei Ni <wni@nvidia.com> Wei Shuai <cpuwolf@gmail.com> Wei Wang <Bessel.Wang@huawei.com> Wei WANG <wei_wang@realsil.com.cn> Wei Yang <w90p710@gmail.com> Wei Yang <Wei.Yang@wind...
2013 Aug 29
0
[linux-linus test] 18844: regressions - FAIL
...ng Gao <wanlong.gao@gmail.com> Wanpeng Li <liwanp@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Wanpeng Li <liwp.linux@gmail.com> Wanpeng Li <liwp@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Warner Wang <warner.wang@hp.com> Warren Turkal <wt@ooyala.com> Wayne Boyer <wayneb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@gmail.com> Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com> Wei Ni <wni@nvidia.com> Wei Shuai <cpuwolf@gmail.com> Wei Wang <Bessel.Wang@huawei.com> Wei WANG <wei_wang@realsil.com.cn> Wei Yang <w90p710@gmail.com> Wei Yang <Wei.Yang@wind...