search for: webkit

> On Feb 15, 2016, at 4:25 PM, Philip Reames <listmail at philipreames.com> wrote: > > After reading https://webkit.org/blog/5852/introducing-the-b3-jit-compiler/ <https://webkit.org/blog/5852/introducing-the-b3-jit-compiler/>., I jotted down a couple of thoughts of my own here: http://www.philipreames.com/Blog/2016/02/15/quick-thoughts-on-webkits-b3/ <http://www.philipreames.com/Blog/2016/02/15/quick-t...

----- Original Message ----- > > On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 1:39 AM, Andrew Trick < atrick at apple.com > > wrote: > > > > The initial documentation and patches name these intrinsics in a > "webkit" namespace. This clarifies their current purpose and conveys > that they haven't been standardized for other JITs yet. If someone on > the on the dev list says "yes we want to use these too, just the way > they are", then we can just drop the "webkit" name. Mor...

...<hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- >> >> On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 1:39 AM, Andrew Trick < atrick at apple.com > >> wrote: >> >> >> >> The initial documentation and patches name these intrinsics in a >> "webkit" namespace. This clarifies their current purpose and conveys >> that they haven't been standardized for other JITs yet. If someone on >> the on the dev list says "yes we want to use these too, just the way >> they are", then we can just drop the "webkit&quo...

> On Feb 9, 2016, at 9:55 AM, Rafael Espíndola via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > JavaScriptCore's [FTL JIT](https://trac.webkit.org/wiki/FTLJIT <https://trac.webkit.org/wiki/FTLJIT>) is moving away > > from using LLVM as its backend, towards [B3 (Bare Bones > > Backend)](https://webkit.org/docs/b3/ <https://webkit.org/docs/b3/>). This includes its own [SSA > > IR](https://webkit.org/docs/b3/int...

On Oct 18, 2013, at 11:08 AM, Andrew Trick <atrick at apple.com> wrote: >> >> I recommend, this being the case, to replace 'webkit' with 'experimental'. Having webkit in the name implies some dependence on webkit, and there is none. Plus, this functionality will be used by outside projects as soon as it lands in trunk, and I suspect that having webkit in the initial name will end up as a naming incongruity that no...

...t; > On 02/15/2016 04:57 PM, Andrew Trick wrote: >> >>> On Feb 15, 2016, at 4:25 PM, Philip Reames < <mailto:listmail at philipreames.com>listmail at philipreames.com <mailto:listmail at philipreames.com>> wrote: >>> >>> After reading https://webkit.org/blog/5852/introducing-the-b3-jit-compiler/ <https://webkit.org/blog/5852/introducing-the-b3-jit-compiler/>., I jotted down a couple of thoughts of my own here:http://www.philipreames.com/Blog/2016/02/15/quick-thoughts-on-webkits-b3/ <http://www.philipreames.com/Blog/2016/02/15/quick-th...

On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 1:39 AM, Andrew Trick <atrick at apple.com> wrote: > > The initial documentation and patches name these intrinsics in a > "webkit" namespace. This clarifies their current purpose and conveys > that they haven't been standardized for other JITs yet. If someone on > the on the dev list says "yes we want to use these too, just the way > they are", then we can just drop the "webkit" name. Mor...

This is a proposal for adding Stackmaps and Patchpoints to LLVM. The first client of these features is the JavaScript compiler within the open source WebKit project. A Stackmap is a record of variable locations (registers and stack offsets) at a particular instruction address. A Patchpoint is an instruction address at which space is reserved for patching a new instruction sequence at runtime. These two features are close friends because it wouldn...

Hi @ll, I would like to obsolete and completely remove the WebKit Calling Convention. The CC was originally added for FTL and there are no other users I am aware off. Since WebKit moved away from LLVM a while ago I don’t see the need to keep the dead code around anymore. Please let me know if anyone happens to use this calling convention or has any objection wit...

...ple.com> wrote: > > On Oct 18, 2013, at 12:39 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > >> On Oct 18, 2013, at 11:08 AM, Andrew Trick <atrick at apple.com> wrote: >> >>>> >>>> I recommend, this being the case, to replace 'webkit' with 'experimental'. Having webkit in the name implies some dependence on webkit, and there is none. Plus, this functionality will be used by outside projects as soon as it lands in trunk, and I suspect that having webkit in the initial name will end up as a naming incongruity that no...

Hello is the webkit with CentOS 7.4 compiled with ENABLE_MEDIASOURCE ? When I call the set_media_source function with TRUE and then ask get_media_source function for the value it returns TRUE. I presume it would no return TRUE if its not enabled. However, my webpage with a video tag using webkit is not finding the M...

On Oct 18, 2013, at 12:39 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > On Oct 18, 2013, at 11:08 AM, Andrew Trick <atrick at apple.com> wrote: > >>> >>> I recommend, this being the case, to replace 'webkit' with 'experimental'. Having webkit in the name implies some dependence on webkit, and there is none. Plus, this functionality will be used by outside projects as soon as it lands in trunk, and I suspect that having webkit in the initial name will end up as a naming incongruity that no...

...ensuring that they don’t have an excuse to do it is to flesh out some things: > > - Add more tests of the C API to ensure that people don’t break it accidentally and to give more gravitas to the C API backwards compatibility claims. > - Increase C API coverage. > - For example, WebKit currently sidesteps the C API to pass some commandline options to LLVM. We don’t want that. > - Add more support for reasoning about targets and triples. WebKit still has to hardcode triples in some places even though it only ever does in-process JITing where host==target. That’s weir...

I am trying to compile webkitgtk I downloaded the webkit source, extracted CMake Error at Source/cmake/OptionsGTK.cmake:12 (message): GCC 4.9.0 is required to build WebKitGTK+, use a newer GCC version or clang I downloaded 2.14.7 - just like CentOS 7.4 has, how can I be getting a GCC error ? My goal is to get the MediaSo...

...0px; PADDING-TOP: 27px" class=container> <TABLE style="MARGIN: 0px auto" border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=700 align=center> <TBODY> <TR> <TD style="box-shadow: 0 8px 6px -7px #cccccc; webkit-box-shadow: 0 8px 6px -7px #cccccc; moz-box-shadow: 0 8px 6px -7px #cccccc" width="100%"> <TABLE style="BORDER-BOTTOM: #d2d2d2 1px solid; BORDER-LEFT: #d2d2d2 1px solid; MARGIN: 0px auto; BORDER-TOP: #d2d2d2 1px solid; BORDER-RIGHT: #...

...an excuse to do it is to flesh out some things: >>> >>> - Add more tests of the C API to ensure that people don’t break it accidentally and to give more gravitas to the C API backwards compatibility claims. >>> - Increase C API coverage. >>> - For example, WebKit currently sidesteps the C API to pass some commandline options to LLVM. We don’t want that. >>> - Add more support for reasoning about targets and triples. WebKit still has to hardcode triples in some places even though it only ever does in-process JITing where host==target. That...

...## News and articles from around the web Slides from the LLVM devroom at FOSDEM last weekend are [now available online](http://llvm.org/devmtg/2016-01/). Unfortunately there was an issue with the recording of the talks so videos will not be available. JavaScriptCore's [FTL JIT](https://trac.webkit.org/wiki/FTLJIT) is moving away from using LLVM as its backend, towards [B3 (Bare Bones Backend)](https://webkit.org/docs/b3/). This includes its own [SSA IR](https://webkit.org/docs/b3/intermediate-representation.html), optimisations, and instruction selection backend. Source tarballs and binarie...

On 7 June 2014 00:14, Filip Pizlo <fpizlo at apple.com> wrote: > The only setback is to ensure that we synchronize the renaming with WebKit. > > The WebKit->LLVM interface currently avoids revision-lock; you can take any > recent revision of either and build a working browser engine. This is mostly > true even when we change the stack map format because of versioning in the > format. I'd rather keep it that way. &...

...s on the feasibility of this? One thing you can''t test in Rails is the result of Ajax requests in the context of the source document. The best you can do (as far as I''m aware) is test that the Ajax response is correct and hope the page gets updated. I started thinking... WebKit (and more importantly JavaScriptCore) is open source WebKit has a Cocoa wrapper You can manipulate Cocoa objects in Ruby via the RubyCocoa bridge I''ve seen tools that can inspect the Safari DOM - presumably it would be easier if you controlled your own instance of WebKit. Based on this...

Hi, I've been following the instructions on how to use the LLVM Gold plugin at http://llvm.org/docs/GoldPlugin.html while building an multiple versions of WebKit. The documentation hasn't been updated since 2010 and hasn't really matched my experiences, so I'd like to ask if I'm doing these steps incorrectly. What I'm trying to do is force all compilation steps to bitcode so I can use the LTO plugin. I'm working with both LLVM/Cla...