search for: weberize

HI, I am testing several models about three latent constructs that measure risk attitudes. Two models with different structure obtained identical of fit measures from chisqure to BIC. Model1 assumes three factors are correlated with each other and model two assumes a higher order factor exist and three factors related to this higher factor instead of to each other. Model1: model.one

Hi Steve, MTA = Postfix I have amavis - spamassassin - dspam installed. i think spamassassin scnas after dspam, cuase in the mail headers dspam comes at first. I use Dovecot as Imap Server OS = Gentoo Linux i put the config of dspam here = http://rafb.net/p/VCX8XO97.html if u need more confs just tell me , i can paste then marko Steve schrieb: > Hallo Marko > > This is not

My file is 3 hours long, so decoding takes around 5 minutes on an average computer. That is a bit too long unfortunately... Am 23.12.2011 20:38, schrieb Steve Checkoway: > On Dec 23, 2011, at 10:54, Hermann Weber<hermie.weber at gmx.de> wrote: > >> And how many frames does Speex need to "recover"? >> Or is that not predictable? > No idea. My guess is not

Dear Christian van Bijleveld, You can use any of the below DSPs of Texas Instruments 1. TMS320C674x - This supports floating point implementation of opus 2. TMS320C66x - This supports both floating and fixed point implementations 3. TMS320C64x - This supports only fixed point implementation Regards, Mahantesh On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 10:12 PM, <opus-request at xiph.org> wrote: >

Peter, thanks for the idea! I did it exactly as you described... and I still get "Illegal instruction" on the 386 platform. I also tried # CFLAGS='-mcpu=i386 -march=i386' ./configure --prefix=/my/prefix/here and # CFLAGS="-mcpu=i386 -march=i386" ./configure --prefix=/my/prefix/here just for grins, and all had the same result. Still trying... Thanks, Mike >

What do you see as the pros and cons of making it a stable target? Does anyone else have any concerns about doing so? -Chris > On Feb 14, 2020, at 7:59 AM, Nico Weber via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > +better dylanmckay address > > On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 10:58 AM Nico Weber <thakis at chromium.org <mailto:thakis at chromium.org>> wrote:

Hi to all This is the first time I am quoting a question and I hope, my question is not too basic... For the following data, I wish to draw a fitted curve. x <- c(123,129,141,144,144,145,149,150,158,159,163,174,183,187,242,248) y <- c(14.42,26.96,31.3,19.95,36.36,15.4,24.76,35.39,28.07,40.97,26.23,42.83,46.53,14.79,49.18,48.08) If I plot the data, it looks somehow that a logistic

Hello together, perhabs anyone of you, has an ideal, how i can do this: I have a matrix, like this one: [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] abnr2 11425 11425 11555 11888 TIME 2 1 1 2 Cat 1 2 1

I have the following: def index begin @restaurant_pages, @restaurants = paginate :restaurants, :order => (params[ :sort ] || "name"), :per_page => 2 @cuisines = Cuisine.find_all rescue redirect_to :action => :index end end # sort by cuisine def

And how many frames does Speex need to "recover"? Or is that not predictable? Greetings, Hermann Am 23.12.2011 19:17, schrieb Steve Checkoway: > > On Dec 23, 2011, at 10:03 , Hermann Weber wrote: > >> I found out something: >> >> The more frames I decode before the frame that I actually want to >> decode, the better the quality becomes. >> For

I don't see how the policy of supporting 2 versions is related to that difficulty though. Whether we support 1 versions or 2 versions, 1 version is still going to be deprecated every time a new version is released. So this burden on upgrading buildbots doesn't seem to be much different. As long as chromium compiler version is not tied to llvm compiler version (and if it did, that would be

Hello. I need R in Version 1.8.0 or earlier. I also need the packages foreign, x-table and gregmisc for this version. Does anyone know where I can get it? Greetings Michael Weber [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

I frequently see mention of how upgrading is problematic, is there anyone here for whom upgrading msvc versions is problematic? It seems like we keep talking in hypotheticals, but I'd like to hear from someone for whom it is *actually* a problem, and why. Vs community is permissive enough now that licensing isn't an issue. And every time this comes up it seems like we're saying

On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 1:30 PM, Aaron Ballman <aaron at aaronballman.com> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 1:23 PM, Nico Weber via cfe-dev > <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > As mentioned upthread, we're still on update 2 for various reasons. > > Do you mind elaborating on those reasons? Off the top of my head, clang-cl couldn't handle the code

Hey Nico, I'm actually not sure where the configurations for that bot are stored. I suspect Duncan may have a better idea. I'm reasonably certain that the missing +x is just an oversight. -Chris > On May 30, 2019, at 6:24 PM, Nico Weber via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Vedant or Chris: Ping :) > > On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 7:56 AM Nico Weber

On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 3:57 PM David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 12:42 PM Nico Weber <thakis at chromium.org> wrote: > >> On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 3:32 PM David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 12:07 PM Nico Weber via cfe-dev < >>> cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>

Hi, well i mounted the OCFS drive over nfs, but it seems to have problems with it, because the NFS does not detect changes (if I add or delete files) the nfs shares still shows the old status. If i delete a file on the OCFS volume, and i am doing a "ls" on one of the nfs clients, it says for every file which was on the ocfs, "no such file or directory". Did I miss

On Wed, Jun 5, 2019 at 1:33 PM <vsk at apple.com> wrote: > > > On Jun 4, 2019, at 4:41 PM, Nico Weber <thakis at chromium.org> wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 2:06 PM <vsk at apple.com> wrote: > >> Hi Nico, >> >> Sorry for the delay, I've been OOO. The llvm-cov bot should produce >> reports for llvm-undname starting today. >>

(resend to the list) And of course, just as I say that, my next ninja build shows the line only once. On reflection I am less sure that the lack of a [N/M] line means they are from the same invocation. Surely ninja could spawn two links, which then independently report "Creating library" after ninja emits the [N/M] lines. --paulr From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at

Hi! I am troubled by Sweave which I want to use in order to plot graphics which I build up successively by the use of grid.layout. Here is the code: <<fig=TRUE,label=evolDist,height=6in,width=3in,pdf=FALSE>>= ## combined plot via grid viewports grid.newpage() pushViewport(viewport(layout=grid.layout(2,1))) vlay <- function(x,y) viewport(layout.pos.row=x, layout.pos.col=y)