search for: wdr

Dear Recipient, It has been noticed that you have been receiving internal e-mails addressed to you at the @wdr.com internet address. On 31st August 2001, this internet address will no longer be applicable to the bank, and you will therefore not receive the e-mail. Please ensure that any people or applications sending e-mails to you using the @wdr.com address, change to using the @ubsw.com internet addre...

Hello Volker, I was able to get those level 10 logs - spitted by machine. Unfortunately I don't know how attachments behave - Groupwise seems not to be happy with those - so I try the redundant way: Here are the logfiles for this event (only one machine, one try): https://www.bitmammut.de/WDR/log.klnmszap32 In this file there are about 3 occurrences of the "NT_STATUS_SHARING_VIOLATION". The first is in line 2661. Also I'll try to set the share-modes to "no" and look how it behaves. Thanks that you want to analyze this. I hope that we would find a solution. R...

Hi, in the following scenario I've got the Problem of "STATUS_SHARE_VIOLATION". Client A (with User 1) copies a file to share X. (with: DENY_NONE 0x120196 WRONLY NONE) Client B (with User 1) reads this file from share X (with: DENY_NONE 0x120089 RDONLY NONE) Now Client C (with User 1) wants also to read this file from share X and gets the STATUS_SHARE_VIOLATION.

...../dm-2 > > > It's looks like that I am not doing the disk drive stuff in the config file correctly. > > > -- > > Gerard Hooton. > Senior Technical Officer > School of Engineering. > University College Cork. > College Road. > Cork. > Ireland. > Loc8: WDR-04-60G > Tel: +353 21 4902296 > Mobile: +353 852813491 > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- Stephen J Smoogen. I've seen things you people wouldn't believe....

All files transferred to my Samba server end up with lower case on the Unix box. Case is not preserved from NT to Unix. For example, if I copy C:\Temp\MyFile to a directory on the Samba server, it ends up there as myfile. What am I missing? I browsed the FAQ's in the web pages, without success... Marc Provencher Foxboro Calgary, Systems Integration and IT (403) 777-4275

...rwxrwx. 1 root root 10 Jul 5 11:07 dm-name-cs_uews027-home -> ../../dm-2 It's looks like that I am not doing the disk drive stuff in the config file correctly. -- Gerard Hooton. Senior Technical Officer School of Engineering. University College Cork. College Road. Cork. Ireland. Loc8: WDR-04-60G Tel: +353 21 4902296 Mobile: +353 852813491

...our analysis of the problem is incorrect, or if there's a better way to attack this problem, please let me know. The chkStaleSession script (Korn Shell) follows. Nico ************************************************************ #!/bin/ksh # # NAME: chkStaleSession # AUTHOR: nicolas.williams@wdr.com based on an analysis of a bug by # roman.gollent@wdr.com # PURPOSE: kill old smbd processes when a client abandons its TCP # connection, establishes a new connections but the Samba # server doesn't know. To be called by smbd as part of share # preexec/postexec configuration. # #...

...was able to get those level 10 logs - spitted by machine. > Unfortunately I don't know how attachments behave - Groupwise seems not to be happy with those - so I try the redundant way: > > Here are the logfiles for this event (only one machine, one try): > https://www.bitmammut.de/WDR/log.klnmszap32 > > In this file there are about 3 occurrences of the "NT_STATUS_SHARING_VIOLATION". > The first is in line 2661. > > Also I'll try to set the share-modes to "no" and look how it behaves. > > Thanks that you want to analyze this. I hop...

Hi all: I have setup Samba on our Solaris server with user based security (though the usernames on the Solaris box differ from our NT/Win95 usernames). Everything seems to work well when I connect from an NT client (4.0) since it asks for a "connect as" string (username), but on 95, I cannot seem to specify a username (and therefore cannot gain access to the server). Is there anyway

Hi, I am running version 1.9.18p8 on Solaris 2.6 connecting to NT 4.0 sp3. When I am logged in as administrator I can't connect to any samba share. My username map contains just "root = Administrator" and my smb.conf file has the following entries: password level = 2 security = server encrypt passwords = yes password server = ntsrv002 ntsrv003 username map =

...ue) == False) > return False; > > pstrcpy(netbios_name,pszParmValue); > #define NW 1 > #ifdef NW > /* run standard_sub_basic on netbios name... needed because > global_myname is not accessed through any lp_ macro. > Nicolas Williams <Nicolas.Williams@wdr.com> */ > standard_sub_basic(netbios_name); > #endif > pstrcpy((char *)parm_ptr,netbios_name); > unix_to_dos((char *)parm_ptr, True); /* FLAG_DOS_STRING --davecb */ > strupper((char *)parm_ptr); > DEBUG(4,("handle_netbios_name: set netbios name to: %s\n&q...

Hi, I've install Samba on AIX 3.2.5 and I'd like to know if there are large companies using Samba ? What's the size of your company ? How many users ? Do you know a limit of Samba ? (performances) Thanks Vincent Ceriani

Hi, ***** First, let me apologize for the disclaimer that accompanies my mail. I don't add it and I can't take it out. **** Is there any implementation of Linear/Quadratic programming in R? Thanks. Mustaque This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy

Proposal: There should be a way to specify that some substitutions should be made in a way that is safe as far as Bourne Shell command lines are concerned (e.g., if %f expands to a string with special characters in it, it should be expanded to a sutiably quoted string in 'print command' parameters). Either all parameters that eventually result in a /bin/sh command line

On Thu, Mar 25, 1999 at 09:16:32AM -0600, Andy Bakun wrote: > Sorry that this is an older message, but I had a few questions. NP. > Nicolas Williams wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 18, 1999 at 07:36:52AM +1100, Andy Bakun wrote: > > > Every day samba gets closer to having more complete NT acl and group > > > support, and it would be nice to be able to do things on the

Has anyone ever setup a pair of fileservers running Samba such that each server can takeover the other server's functionality and identity? It seems to me that a Samba HA setup would be very similar to a virtual server Samba setup. In other words, use the 'include' directive in conjunction with the %L variable to make each smbd process act as the server named by the client. So far so

Attached please find unified diffs against Samba 2.0.6. I'm hoping that others will find it useful and that it may even find its way into Samba 2.0.7 This patch does two things: - Modifies the handling of the 'netbios name' parameter so that standard_sub_basic() is run on its value when the 'netbios name' parameter is processed. This has to be done this way because