search for: wdf_inc

...ut takes an extra weight > contribution from the PostingSource for matching documents). Cool. I'll keep that in mind down the line. That could be a while since some users are still on 1.2 and tend to stick to what's provided by enterprise/LTS distros. > > Or would I fiddle with wdf_inc for all ->index_text and ->add_term > > calls on a per-DB basis? > > That would probably work if you don't want to be able to vary the > prioritisation dynamically. That's a compromise I'll have to make, for now. Thanks for the response!

...ant to be able to search across several DBs which aren't sharded, say: linux-DB, glibc-DB, freebsd-DB. I want to search for something across all of them, but prioritize results to favor one or some of those DBs over others. Is there a way to do that without reindexing? Or would I fiddle with wdf_inc for all ->index_text and ->add_term calls on a per-DB basis? Thanks.

...in 1.4, which doesn't know which shard it is being called for. You can then combine this PostingSource with your query with AND_MAYBE (so it matches exactly what the query does, but takes an extra weight contribution from the PostingSource for matching documents). > Or would I fiddle with wdf_inc for all ->index_text and ->add_term > calls on a per-DB basis? That would probably work if you don't want to be able to vary the prioritisation dynamically. Cheers, Olly

On Sat, Feb 08, 2020 at 06:04:42PM +0000, Eric Wong wrote: > Olly Betts <olly at survex.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 09:33:08PM +0000, Eric Wong wrote: > > > Or would I fiddle with wdf_inc for all ->index_text and ->add_term > > > calls on a per-DB basis? > > > > That would probably work if you don't want to be able to vary the > > prioritisation dynamically. > > That's a compromise I'll have to make, for now. Thanks for the >...

Olly Betts <olly at survex.com> wrote: > On Sat, Feb 08, 2020 at 06:04:42PM +0000, Eric Wong wrote: > > Olly Betts <olly at survex.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 09:33:08PM +0000, Eric Wong wrote: > > > > Or would I fiddle with wdf_inc for all ->index_text and ->add_term > > > > calls on a per-DB basis? > > > > > > That would probably work if you don't want to be able to vary the > > > prioritisation dynamically. > > > > That's a compromise I'll have to make,...