Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "wdf_inc".
2020 Feb 08
2
prioritizing aggregated DBs
...ut takes an extra weight
> contribution from the PostingSource for matching documents).
Cool. I'll keep that in mind down the line. That could be a
while since some users are still on 1.2 and tend to stick to
what's provided by enterprise/LTS distros.
> > Or would I fiddle with wdf_inc for all ->index_text and ->add_term
> > calls on a per-DB basis?
>
> That would probably work if you don't want to be able to vary the
> prioritisation dynamically.
That's a compromise I'll have to make, for now. Thanks for the
response!
2020 Feb 07
2
prioritizing aggregated DBs
...ant to be able to search across several DBs
which aren't sharded, say: linux-DB, glibc-DB, freebsd-DB.
I want to search for something across all of them, but
prioritize results to favor one or some of those DBs over
others. Is there a way to do that without reindexing?
Or would I fiddle with wdf_inc for all ->index_text and
->add_term calls on a per-DB basis?
Thanks.
2020 Feb 07
0
prioritizing aggregated DBs
...in 1.4, which doesn't know which shard it is being
called for.
You can then combine this PostingSource with your query with AND_MAYBE
(so it matches exactly what the query does, but takes an extra weight
contribution from the PostingSource for matching documents).
> Or would I fiddle with wdf_inc for all ->index_text and ->add_term
> calls on a per-DB basis?
That would probably work if you don't want to be able to vary the
prioritisation dynamically.
Cheers,
Olly
2020 Feb 09
0
prioritizing aggregated DBs
On Sat, Feb 08, 2020 at 06:04:42PM +0000, Eric Wong wrote:
> Olly Betts <olly at survex.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 09:33:08PM +0000, Eric Wong wrote:
> > > Or would I fiddle with wdf_inc for all ->index_text and ->add_term
> > > calls on a per-DB basis?
> >
> > That would probably work if you don't want to be able to vary the
> > prioritisation dynamically.
>
> That's a compromise I'll have to make, for now. Thanks for the
>...
2020 Feb 19
2
prioritizing aggregated DBs
Olly Betts <olly at survex.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 08, 2020 at 06:04:42PM +0000, Eric Wong wrote:
> > Olly Betts <olly at survex.com> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 09:33:08PM +0000, Eric Wong wrote:
> > > > Or would I fiddle with wdf_inc for all ->index_text and ->add_term
> > > > calls on a per-DB basis?
> > >
> > > That would probably work if you don't want to be able to vary the
> > > prioritisation dynamically.
> >
> > That's a compromise I'll have to make,...