search for: wayness

Hi! as my subject says I am struggling with the different of a two-way ANOVA and a (two-way) ANCOVA. I found the following examples from this webpage: http://www.statmethods.net/stats/anova.html # One Way Anova (Completely Randomized Design) fit <- aov(y ~ A, data=mydataframe) # Randomized Block Design (B is the blocking factor) fit <- aov(y ~ A + B, data=mydataframe) # Two Way

I'm running RedHat 9 with a TDM400 (2FXO, 2FXS). Before I implemented Asterisk, some users were using Bell services to set-up 5 way calling: The user would set up a three way call on one line, switch to the second line, set up another 3 way call and then link the two lines together with the Flash key, thus establishing a 5 way call (the user, 2 others on line 1, another 2 on line 2). How

Hi, I have an unbalanced dataset on which I would like to perform a one-way anova test using R (aov). According to Wannacott and Wannacott (1990) p. 333, one-way anova with unbalanced data is possible with a few modifications in the anova-calculations. The modified anova calculations should take into account different sample sizes and a modified definition of the average. I was wondering if the

On 05/11/15 09:55, mathias dufresne wrote: > Code is like books, or art (painting...). Some guy produce something, as he > likes, some others use/watch/listen it, as they like. Most of the time > these two ways are different. > > What I mean is it is not because something was not developed to be used in > some way that way of usage is not a good way of usage. > > Perhaps

Not sure if there is an R way to do this or a regular express way, but here is what I am trying to do. I've got lots of data where the format is HH:MM:SS, but I need to format it like HH:MM:00, i.e. round the second down to zero. What is the best way to do this? Thanks again. Jason

Hi, in implementing a backend for a target we work on, I ended up needing to lower the switch instruction in a very specific way that is quite different from the standard llvm way with the decision trees. The custom implementation wants to get rid of the decision blocks that llvm generates between the actual cases basic blocks and the switch root block. What I do currently is basically

hi all, I have a little question about meetme in Asterisk. One of my client ask me that all call can, if is necessary, become conference for 3-4 user during conversation. I think that are 2 way for make this: 1- all call (instead if the users are only 2) are conference 2- using n-way call (http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+n-way+call+HOWTO) I decide to implement the first way because

Hello Probably the easiest way for you is to lower switch instructions via IR-to-IR pass in the way you want. On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Marcello Maggioni <marcello at codeplay.com> wrote: > Hi, > > in implementing a backend for a target we work on, I ended up needing to > lower the switch instruction in a very specific way that is quite different > from the standard

i want to replace certain values of a matrix. i know how to replace them when the values are in a vector. i tried the same way for a matrix and got this answer: la[la==0]<-1 Error in [<-.data.frame(*tmp*, la == 0, value = 1) : matrix subscripts not allowed in replacement i found a way to do this with "for()", but i think this is the worst way to do it. So is there a

Hi Being able to do object oriented programming in R is really good. I now started using the Reference Classes and really like it. Though, I have one problem: I cannot find a way to update a method on an existing object. The flexibility that scripting gives (really needed for interactive data analysis) is lost if everything have to be recalculated all the time. For example I would normally

Hi Not sure if this is a clang or llvm related question so I'm sending to both mailing lists. Anyways, I have few questions regarding size and execution time of instrumented code: We are trying to run code coverage on memory limited hardware and investigating both (generating gcov output using -coverage and the llvm's own way using -fprofile-instr-generate -fcoverage-mapping clang flags)

Hello, What is the best way in rails to check a session hash value for nil ? I have a session hash called user (session[:user]) that sometimes I have to check for a certain variable like session[:user].email. however the following always results in an error if session[:user].email and I always have to do if session[:user] and session[:user].email Is there a cleaner way to do this then

Hello, dear R users. I've already sent a question here, but I'm not sure that it had been read. I need to visualize classification of my numerical data based on 2-3 factors. As I suppose, the best way is a tree. With an orbitrary function at the ends (leaves), or at least with means of my data at the ends. What is the way to do it? As I found, ctree offers binary classification, but

Hi all, I'm doing a 3-way ANOVA like this: summary(aov(formula('FP ~ (lum * obj * man)3 - Error(vp/(lum * obj * man)3)'),data=dataf)) But in the output I only get 1- and 2-way effects, like this one: Error: vp:obj:man Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value Pr(>F) obj:man 1 1.5291e-34 1.5291e-34 5.7011 0.0542 . Residuals 6 1.6093e-34 2.6822e-35 --- Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001

Apparently asterisk's default way to a 3-way conference lets the user in the middle hangup and the other parties stay on the conversation. This is great some times but it creates quite a bit of problems when trunks dont have disconnect supervision or when trying to do accounting and billing on the user. Here is the 'normal' situation when a user tries the setup a 3 way conference once

Is there a way to save EVERYTHING in R? Hi all, Could you please shed some lights on me about this? I am trying to see if there is a way to save EVERYTHING in R to a file, something like "save.image"... But "save.image" doesn't save environment variables such as those properties that are obtained using "Sys.getenv()" function... So is there a way to save

I''m a little stumped on how to approach the subject of representing relationships between a single model object. Basically, I want a User to be able to mark others as Friends, Contacts, etc. The caveat is that User A can mark User B as a Friend but that doesn''t mean User A is marked as a friend by User B. It can either be a one-way relationship or two-way relationship. Right

Sorry about the very long email, but this is a hairy topic that''s been annoying me for some time and I decided to try to do something about. Also, if you got this twice, I apologize too, but it didn''t seem to have successfully gone out the first time. Background: ---------- I''ve been dealing with Rails for about a year and a half now. I''ve been using

Is there a way using dovecot facilities to block an IP from attempting POP3 connections (similar to the sendmail access file for smtp connections)? I usually do this at my border firewall, but if there's a quick and dirty way in dovecot to do this, it'd make life a little simpler. Thanks steve campbell

I''m just wondering what the best way to go about loading my API keys from the database is ... Should I simply place them in the ENV variable? Is there a way better way to go about this?