search for: wavi

On 19 July 2016 at 23:16, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote: >> In the past, we were hit by web spiders that ignored completely the >> robots.txt file. Anton has made that better, but it can escalate if >> the spider realise we blocked them. There are ways to work around, but >> not without accidentally blocking innocent people (mostly in China). > >

Perhaps it helps to know that I have access to the machines and have helped debug many of the current problems. I'm not speaking from the outside, guessing how hard things are. I also think you are assuming a lot about where services can be hosted and at which cost (labour, not hardware). So, unless you are volunteering to take care of the whole infrastructure, I suggest taking the opinion

On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 10:16 AM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > >> > On Oct 8, 2014, at 1:55 AM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> >> wrote: >> > >> > On 8 October 2014 05:25, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote:

On Fri, Jun 07, 2024 at 09:11:32PM +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, 31 May 2024 11:59:47 +0200 > Danilo Krummrich <dakr at redhat.com> wrote: > > > Once we get to a conclusion I can send a series with only the device and firmare > > abstractions such that we can get them in outside of the scope of the reset of > > both series to get your

Hi, I have estimated a step function and need to take the derivatives of this function at all points in the range. Does anyone know of any clever ways to do this? (I have already tried to fit a polynomial through the points in order to obtain a smooth representation and then take derivatives of this. Also tried to smooth it, and used an SG differentiator. Results are rather poor so far, in

Hello All, Recently, I build three Asterisk 1.4 box and installed licensed copy of G729 codec. Before installing the G729 codec I tested the MOH on all three Asterisks box and it was working fine. So I install G729 codec and retested MOH and it was all wavy... Meaning the music was going up and down and missing bits and pieces and choppy... Any idea what did I do wrong? The MOH files are the

On Fri, Jun 07, 2024 at 02:36:50PM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > Anyway, that's all hand-wavy right now, sorry, to get back to the point > here, again, let's take this, which will allow the firmware bindings to > be resubmitted and hopefully accepted, and we can move forward from > there to "real" things like a USB or PCI or even platform device and > driver binding

Hi Bill, > Here's what I get with TOT compiling with -Os. The orig.ll is what I get > before r72619. Notice that orig.ll has only one function in it. Both the > one you sent and duncan.ll have more than one function. It's not the > fact that more than one function is showing up, but these functions in > particular shouldn't be there because of the implicit/explicit

On Fri, Jun 07, 2024 at 03:33:39PM +0200, Danilo Krummrich wrote: > On Fri, Jun 07, 2024 at 02:36:50PM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > > Anyway, that's all hand-wavy right now, sorry, to get back to the point > > here, again, let's take this, which will allow the firmware bindings to > > be resubmitted and hopefully accepted, and we can move forward from > > there to

On 19 July 2016 at 22:35, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote: > Claiming that it "will be *a lot* less” burden that now is easy, but I don’t see any obvious fact to back this up. > What is the current maintenance requirement of SVN/Git? Can someone who knows provides some fact? I'll let Anton tell his side, and Tanya talk about the real costs, but here are some

Hi, TLDR: I totally support considering compile time regression as bug. I'm glad you bring this topic. Also it is worth pointing at this recent thread: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-March/096488.html And also this blog post comparing the evolution of clang and gcc on this aspect: http://hubicka.blogspot.nl/2016/03/building-libreoffice-with-gcc-6-and-lto.html I will repeat

On Dec 4, 2009, at 12:52 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Bill, > >> There's a problem with your check-in for r72619 is causing "weak >> external" symbols to appear in C++ code when it shouldn't. Take >> this code for example, >> #include <stdexcept> >> void dummysymbol() { >> throw(std::runtime_error("string"));

On 31 March 2016 at 21:41, Mehdi Amini via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > TLDR: I totally support considering compile time regression as bug. Me too. I also agree that reverting fresh and reapplying is *much* easier than trying to revert late. But I'd like to avoid dubious metrics. > The closest I could find would be what Chandler wrote in: >

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95429 Bug ID: 95429 Summary: NV46 G72M picture is always distorted on VGA output Product: xorg Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau

Whilst bored I purchased HalfLife for Windows, having read people mention on Slashdot that it runs on Wine. I run Debian (woody) on an AMD Athlon 1.4GHz machine with 1Gb RAM as my desktop. It currently has a Voodoo3 video card, though I have a dual head Radeon which I'm going to use once I get a monitor that is compatible (my current monitor has a very wavy display with that card). I

On 2017-04-26 19:56, Eric Christopher wrote: > That's really weird. I'm quite surprised that the entry block was moved > so much later in the function but haven't had a chance to look more at > it. Probably want to take a look and find out where that's happening and > why. From irc, thegameg helped me find the -enable-shrink-wrap=false, which "fixes" this,

On Wed Oct 08 2014 at 7:25:29 PM Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 10:23 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 10:16 AM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Chris Lattner

> On Oct 8, 2014, at 1:55 AM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > > On 8 October 2014 05:25, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: >>> Up until now the thread has been about “formatting”. You suggested renaming >>> every variable in the project! >> >> If that's what it takes. > > If we're still talking about

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Mehdi Amini via cfe-dev" <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> > To: "Rafael Espíndola" <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> > Cc: "llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>, "cfe-dev" <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> > Sent: Tuesday, March 8, 2016 11:40:47 AM > Subject: Re: [cfe-dev] [llvm-dev] llvm and

Is there a defined way to get the address of a BasicBlock as a value? According to the language reference, any use outside of indirectbr and comparison against null is undefined. There is some wording about targets possibly allowing use in inline assembly. Is that really the only option? Is there anything a pass can query to see if it is allowed for a target? I don't see anything like that