search for: wavey

If you can produce a simple minimal repro that exhibits this issue on some procedural signal (sine wave, etc) I'd love to look into it some more - I'm maintaining a hardened version of the Speex Resampler and would be very concerned if this bug made it into production. - Sherief -----Original Message----- From: speex-dev-bounces at xiph.org [mailto:speex-dev-bounces at xiph.org] On

...ring this reset phase is somehow longer than we need it to be or something along those lines. After the rewind is dealt with, then the latency of the resampler is not a problem any more... (and not resetting and doing other such things also prevents overhead). I'm not sure about the above hand-wavey, vague explanation but I suspect it's something in that general area that's causing the problems rather than a bug in speex per se. Col. -- Colin Guthrie gmane(at)colin.guthr.ie http://colin.guthr.ie/ Day Job: Tribalogic Limited [http://www.tribalogic.net/] Open Source: Mageia Cont...

...gh the test suite using the object file emitter, disassembling the output and comparing it to what comes out from the .s->assembler->disassembler execution path. Crush all differences. 3. JIT. Same basic approach as (1) to replace the current object code emitter with an MC based one. a. Hand-wavey stuff. I haven't thought much about this bit yet except in broad terms. b. More hand waving. 4. ??? 5. Profit. -Jim On Sep 14, 2010, at 10:02 AM, Jason Kim wrote: > Hi everyone, Rafael has graciously given me some pointers for helping > out on the ARM/MC .s emission infrastructure, a...

...wo SVN developers may be considering developing a distributed SVN. That would indeed be welcome and would alleviate a lot of issues. Unfortunately I can't find anything offficialish that indicates the idea is being persued. It also looks to be two years away, at least, given some rather hand-wavey predictions of when stuff could happen, if approved. Admittedly, this was a very quick search. If you have pointers, that would be very helpful. >> Not true. SCM support means you get to use all sorts of nice merge >> tools to handle the sync. Applying patches sucks. >> >...

Hi everyone, Rafael has graciously given me some pointers for helping out on the ARM/MC .s emission infrastructure, and I am volunteering to do so. It looks like as of yesterday, the MC obj emitter for ARM is also incomplete (there does not seem to be a ARMMCCodeEmitter.cpp, for example) So if anyone already has started looking into this, I'd like to pool info so as to not step on toes. Any

...ring this reset phase is somehow longer than we need it to be or something along those lines. After the rewind is dealt with, then the latency of the resampler is not a problem any more... (and not resetting and doing other such things also prevents overhead). I'm not sure about the above hand-wavey, vague explanation but I suspect it's something in that general area that's causing the problems rather than a bug in speex per se. Col. -- Colin Guthrie gmane(at)colin.guthr.ie http://colin.guthr.ie/ Day Job: Tribalogic Limited [http://www.tribalogic.net/] Open Source: Mageia Cont...

On Sep 8, 2011, at 9:13 PM, David A. Greene wrote: > Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> writes: > >>> In other words, svn is not a distributed SCM. It has long struck me as >>> odd that a project whose license encourages private copies would stick >>> with an SCM that has no support for keeping such copies. >>> >> It's my

Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> writes: >> In other words, svn is not a distributed SCM. It has long struck me as >> odd that a project whose license encourages private copies would stick >> with an SCM that has no support for keeping such copies. >> > It's my understanding that the upcoming new version of SVN will have > off-line commits available.

...ite using the object file emitter, disassembling the output and comparing it to what comes out from the .s->assembler->disassembler execution path. Crush all differences. > > 3. JIT. Same basic approach as (1) to replace the current object code emitter with an MC based one. > a. Hand-wavey stuff. I haven't thought much about this bit yet except in broad terms. > b. More hand waving. Lots of handwavy stuff - fast incremental feedback based optimization <blah> > 4. ??? > > 5. Profit. > > -Jim > > On Sep 14, 2010, at 10:02 AM, Jason Kim wrote: > &g...

...bject file emitter, disassembling > the output and comparing it to what comes out from the > .s->assembler->disassembler execution path. Crush all differences. > > 3. JIT. Same basic approach as (1) to replace the current object code > emitter with an MC based one. > a. Hand-wavey stuff. I haven't thought much about this bit yet except in > broad terms. > b. More hand waving. > > 4. ??? > > 5. Profit. > > -Jim > > On Sep 14, 2010, at 10:02 AM, Jason Kim wrote: > > > Hi everyone, Rafael has graciously given me some pointers for helpi...

Hi John, Is it correct to assume that you are in favor of - changing llvm.assume to be more expressive - operand bundle uses, especially w/o outlining - outlining, if we can show it plays well with transformations, e.g. the binding to the code is "weak" I inlined more comments below. On 12/18, John McCall wrote: > On 18 Dec 2019, at 11:28, Doerfert, Johannes wrote: >

...y be > considering developing a distributed SVN. That would indeed be welcome > and would alleviate a lot of issues. Unfortunately I can't find > anything offficialish that indicates the idea is being persued. It also > looks to be two years away, at least, given some rather hand-wavey > predictions of when stuff could happen, if approved. > > Admittedly, this was a very quick search. If you have pointers, that > would be very helpful. > > >> Not true. SCM support means you get to use all sorts of nice merge > >> tools to handle the sync. Apply...