search for: waveoutunpreparehead

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "waveoutunpreparehead".

Did you mean: waveoutunprepareheader
2003 Nov 24
3
Error while trying to install an accounting program called Datax - Need help
...in 32bit DLL 'G:\SETUP\NORWEGIAN\XTRAS\TEXTAUTH.X32' (0x6d1c0000) No debug information in 32bit DLL 'G:\SETUP\NORWEGIAN\XTRAS\TEXTXTRA.X32' (0x6a000000) Unhandled exception: page fault on read access to 0x00000010 in 32-bit code (0x41492012). In 32-bit mode. 0x41492012 (WINMM.DLL.waveOutUnprepareHeader+0x42 in winmm.dll.so): testb $0x2,0x10(%edi) Wine-dbg>WineDbg terminated on pid a
2007 Dec 06
1
Echo cancellor on Windows, a few questions.
...in my chair and talk over a voip call using speex. as the mic and the speakers are built into the laptop, an echo canceller is required. what i am doing is this : First, each time i finish writing a block to the waveout, i copy it into a buffer like this: Segment *pseg = (Segment *)phead; waveOutUnprepareHeader(waveOut, phead, sizeof(WAVEHDR)); memcpy(remote, pseg->samples, 160 * sizeof(short)); Second, each time i get samples from the mic, i do the echo cancellation like this: if (nsamples == 160){ speex_echo_cancellation(echo_state, (short *)pseg->samples, remote, unechoed); q = unec...
2004 Feb 03
1
starcraft problem
...o debug information in 32bit DLL 'C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM\MSACM.DRV' (0x44540000) No debug information in 32bit DLL 'C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM\MIDIMAP.DRV' (0x446a0000) Unhandled exception: page fault on read access to 0x00000010 in 32-bit code (0x444c5aab). In 32-bit mode. 0x444c5aab (WINMM.DLL.waveOutUnprepareHeader+0x2b in WINMM.DLL): testb $0x2,0x10(%esi) Wine-dbg> Any suggestions how to solve this? Greets, cedric Some versions: wine-20031118 linux-2.6.1 gcc 3.3.2 Glibc-2.3.2 P.S. I wanted to do all installing as a normal user , so i installed wine the hard way: ./configure --prefix=/home/cedric/...
2007 Dec 04
2
[PATCH] Add Visual Studio 2008 Prject files
On Dec 3, 2007 1:24 PM, Stefan Reuther <streu@gmx.de> wrote: > John Miles wrote: > > What's wrong with a plain old .bat file, or even an NMAKE .mak file? > > Ship two files, debug.bat and release.bat, and call it good. > > > > It is best to leave project-file creation up to individual users, > > in my opinion. > > I second that. When I played around