Displaying 13 results from an estimated 13 matches for "wave1".
Did you mean:
wave
2008 Mar 26
1
[LLVMdev] PATCH: Use size reduction -- wave1
.../GVN.cpp
emacs +1231 lib/Transforms/Scalar/GVN.cpp
- the patch is pretty dull, mostly mechanical changes
- r48837 + this patch builds and the tests run without errors
- I have omitted Create-ifying llvm-upgrade, as it is not on trunk
any more
- Some statistics:
ggreif$ svn diff include > wave1-include.diff
ggreif$ svn diff lib > wave1-lib.diff
ggreif$ svn diff examples tools > wave1-rest.diff
ggreif$ wc *.diff
798 3883 33028 wave1-include.diff
3894 16494 179719 wave1-lib.diff
441 1769 18291 wave1-rest.diff
5133 22146 231038 total
- I care...
2008 Mar 30
0
[LLVMdev] PING: PATCH: Use size reduction -- wave1
Not really urgent, but I keep getting conflicts the day or another.
Cheers,
Gabor
2008 Apr 08
0
[LLVMdev] PATCH: Use size reduction -- wave1 (algorithms)
As promised here comes the algorithmic part of the
project.
I have documented the way how the User object can be
recovered from an array of Use objects.
I have included a reference implementation in Haskell,
along with a randomized test suite, which passes.
This is just for those who want to manually
prove the correctness of the C++ algorithm.
If you wish I can remove (or move to another
2008 Apr 04
0
[LLVMdev] PATCH: Use size reduction -- wave1
On Apr 3, 10:53 pm, Gabor Greif <ga... at mac.com> wrote:
...
>
> > 3) Make sure that make check and some reasonable subset of llvm-test
> > passes with this patch :)
>
> I have never run llvm-test in the past. Is it just checking it out and
> following a readme?
After building an llvm-gcc (4.2.1), see below, I tried running this. I
configured:
./configure
2008 Apr 04
0
[LLVMdev] PATCH: Use size reduction -- wave1
On Apr 4, 7:51 pm, Török Edwin <edwinto... at gmail.com> wrote:
> heisenbug wrote:
> > On Apr 3, 10:53 pm, Gabor Greif <ga... at mac.com> wrote:
> > ...
>
> >>> 3) Make sure that make check and some reasonable subset of llvm-test
> >>> passes with this patch :)
>
> >> I have never run llvm-test in the past. Is it just checking it
2008 Apr 04
2
[LLVMdev] PATCH: Use size reduction -- wave1
heisenbug wrote:
> On Apr 3, 10:53 pm, Gabor Greif <ga... at mac.com> wrote:
> ...
>
>
>>> 3) Make sure that make check and some reasonable subset of llvm-test
>>> passes with this patch :)
>>>
>> I have never run llvm-test in the past. Is it just checking it out and
>> following a readme?
>>
>
>
> After
2008 Apr 04
0
[LLVMdev] PATCH: Use size reduction -- wave1
On Fri, 4 Apr 2008, heisenbug wrote:
>> point taken. thanks!
>
>
> Whatever I try I get something like this:
>
> ggreif$ cd MultiSource/
> ggreif$ make
> make[2]: *** No rule to make target `Output/be.bc', needed by `Output/
> burg.linked.rbc'. Stop.
> make[1]: *** [Burg/.makeall] Error 2
> make: *** [Applications/.makeall] Error 2
This is the
2008 Apr 03
5
[LLVMdev] PATCH: Use size reduction -- wave1
Chris wrote:
> On Mar 26, 2008, at 3:16 PM, Gabor Greif wrote:
> > here comes the patch for the first wave of Use class size reduction.
> >
> > I have split it into 3 files, corresponding to
> > - header changes
> > - implementation changes
> > - applications
>
> nice!
>
> > This at the moment does not contain the description how the
>
2008 Apr 04
3
[LLVMdev] PATCH: Use size reduction -- wave1
On Apr 4, 8:06 pm, heisenbug <ggr... at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Apr 4, 7:51 pm, Török Edwin <edwinto... at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > heisenbug wrote:
> > > On Apr 3, 10:53 pm, Gabor Greif <ga... at mac.com> wrote:
> > > ...
>
> > >>> 3) Make sure that make check and some reasonable subset of llvm-test
> > >>>
2012 Aug 21
2
Iterative sampling with restrictions
Hi all,
I'm working on a seemingly trivial problem that I can't figure out how
to implement in R. I'd be most grateful for any help here.
I want to do the following: first, randomly assign each of n units to
one of g groups of size n/g. Then, randomly re-assign each of the n
units to a different group (i.e., same as the first step, but the unit
can't be assigned to a group to
2005 Sep 18
5
Monitor and sox mix quality
Hello All,
I am using monitor with soxmix, however the quality seems somewhat low
after sox converts to mp3.
Does anyone know a way to get a higher quality file? Some of my lines
are coming in on isdn.
Regards,
Greg
2008 Jan 14
1
Asterisk 1.4 Call Recording
...at Aiur asterisk]# cat /usr/local/bin/2wav2mp3
#!/bin/sh
# 2wav2mp3 - create stereo mp3 out of two mono wav-files
# source files will be deleted
#
# 2005 05 23 dietmar zlabinger http://www.zlabinger.at/asterisk
# 2006 03 24 modified for sox 12.17.9 as of Suse9.2 by Matthias
#
# usage: 2wav2mp3 <wave1> <wave2> <mp3>
# designed for Asterisk Monitor(file,format,option) where option is "e" and
# the variable
# MONITOR_EXEC/usr/local/bin/2wav2mp3
# location of SOX and SOXMIX
# (set according to your system settings, eg. /usr/bin)
SOX=/usr/bin/sox
SOXMIX=/usr/bin/soxmix
# l...
2006 Feb 10
1
2wav2mp3, monitor, mixmonitor, mpg123, queues
Hello!
I'm using Asterisk for our office telephony, but we have some problems
that still we can't resolve about it. Here they are:
1) merge in/out call recording files
I also tried to use a script I found on the internet, called 2wav2mp3
In extensions.conf I added the following lines
; script to be executed when monitoring has been finished
MONITOR_EXEC=/usr/local/bin/2wav2mp3
exten