search for: watercool

Displaying 11 results from an estimated 11 matches for "watercool".

Did you mean: waltercool
2007 Apr 06
3
Mailer method missing
...proval(p) NoMethodError: undefined method `request_admin_approval'' for SiteMailer:Class >> SiteMailer.method_defined? :request_admin_approval => true The method code: class SiteMailer < ActionMailer::Base def request_admin_approval(person) @subject = ''Watercooler - New User Notification'' @body["person"] = person @recipients = "me" @from = ''server-6AQQTOP5xU+Z+DCkdF2Uwti2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org'' @sent_on = Time.now @headers = {} end -- Posted via http://www...
2007 Mar 27
4
Error in installling gem install acts_as_ferret
Hello everybody! I try to install ferret gem in my local machine . It goes like this : [root at dhcppc2 ~]# gem install ferret Need to update 1 gems from http://gems.rubyforge.org . complete Select which gem to install for your platform (i686-linux) 1. ferret 0.11.3 (ruby) 2. ferret 0.11.2 (ruby) 3. ferret 0.11.1 (ruby) >>1 Building native extensions. This could take a while...
2013 Oct 29
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers
...ncreasing pressure for LLVM to make use of new C++ language > and library features. pressure from where? (sub-projects, google.. ?) > > I have historically been more conservative on this topic, but > listening to many people and looking at some of the C++ features we > are missing watercooler or mailing list? > > > These days, this list seems increasingly worth the cost of forcing > users to get a modern toolchain onto their systems. > I'm all for modern toolchains, but a modern toolchain requirement and depending on c++11 features are independent issues. You coul...
2013 Oct 29
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers
...Those contributing patches, reviewing patches, and writing the code that makes up LLVM's various projects. > > >> I have historically been more conservative on this topic, but listening >> to many people and looking at some of the C++ features we are missing >> > watercooler or mailing list? All of the above. There have been plenty of discussions on the mailing lists and it patch review that ended up being "yes, it would be great if we could do that, but we don't have X feature in C++11, so we have to do this ugly thing over here". > These days,...
2004 Aug 06
0
a new directory service
...tell you how many people liked the Tricky album, but it does tell you how many people bought it. People DO buy based on that criteria: It tells you what the nation is listening to this week, it keeps you current, and gives you something to talk about with your peers and co-workers around the watercooler, and at the very least, it'll give you an idea as to what you might want to buy in to if you have no clue as to what you want to be purchasing and have nothing better to go on.. It's the reason why film studios release their figures for the weekend, it's the reason why there are...
2013 Oct 29
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 5:06 PM, "C. Bergström" <cbergstrom at pathscale.com>wrote: > fuzzy://How much "heads up" One full release cycle, so approximately 6 months before a release incorporating this. In addition, probably several weeks to a month between the initial branch for the 3.4 release and the commits that make this so. Still more weeks between when we put
2013 Oct 29
3
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers
On 10/29/13 06:52 AM, Chandler Carruth wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 4:47 PM, "C. Bergström" > <cbergstrom at pathscale.com <mailto:cbergstrom at pathscale.com>> wrote: > > For those driving c++11 in clang/llvm - Would it generally be > acceptable to have a "sunrise" period where the preliminary > evaluation has been done
2004 Aug 06
7
a new directory service
> That said, we are all aware of the fact that there is a large amount of > cheating going on, and therefore that number may not be so relevant nor > accurate. With the system I've outlined, there is no reason to cheat. There's no need to fake listener counts because it's not there. Certainly people can make this available in the 'description' field, ie, how
2012 May 11
34
gaming on multiple OS of the same machine?
Hi, I am new to Xen and I was wondering if the following construction would be feasible with the current Xen. I would like to put 2/3/4 new computers in my house, mainly for gaming. Instead of buying 2/3/4 different computers, I was thinking of building one computer with a 4/6/8-core CPU, 2/3/4 GPUs, 2/3/4 small SSDs, and attach 2/3/4 monitors to it, 2/3/4 keyboards and 2/3/4 mouses, and run VGA
2014 Jul 26
5
[PATCH v2 0/3] drm/gk20a: support for reclocking
Second version of the gk20a clock patches. I have tried to keep the therm and volt devices mandatory in the clock driver, but unfortunately they are too tied to bios to allow this, at least for the moment. Consequently this version is mostly a port of the first version to Ben's tree. Ben, please let me know what I have done wrong in terms of integration to your tree, as the main purpose of
2014 Jul 10
10
[PATCH 0/3] drm/gk20a: support for reclocking
This series adds support for reclocking on GK20A. The first two patches touch the clock subsystem to allow GK20A to operate, by making the presence of the thermal and voltage devices optional, and allowing pstates to be provided directly instead of being probed using the BIOS (which Tegra does not have). The last patch adds the GK20A clock device. Arguably the clock can be seen as a stripped-down