search for: wary

On 24 February 2016 at 19:49, Sean Silva via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Great! I'll circle around to this at some point. Despite the "obvious" > nature of it I still am wary of underestimating the cruftiness of the > buildbots, so I'll probably do it some time at night when the bots are > mostly green so that I can easily see if any bots *are* broken by this. While at it, can you call "env python2" in the shebang line? It makes it a lot easier for...

Ars Technica reports of ?abandoned projects? on SourceForge being taken over by SourceForge with adware installers added to executables. arstechnica.com/information-technology/2015/05/sourceforge-grabs-gimp-for-windows-account-wraps-installer-in-bundle-pushing-adware/ This might be something to be wary of with FLAC considering the main focus for FLAC has moved from SourceForge to Xiph.org. Perhaps consider to remove the downloads from SourceForge but keep the ticket system there? Maurits

...3.6.23 to be a domain member, using the 2012 R2 AD to authenticate users to access Samba shares on the AIX server. This is the way it's working today at a 2003 functional level. Will 3.6.23 work this way with 2012 R2, or is an upgrade into the 4.X family mandated? The requestor is upgrade-wary, so if they can stay at 3.6.23, that's the way they want to go. Thank you in advance for any guidance offered! Bob Wyatt

...quite happy. > What PVE version? It's 8.1.4 > Try adding: > > features: nesting=1 > > that is the default for new container for PVE7 onward, but not added > automatically for PVE6 containers. Thank you, nesting is set to 1. Is there anything else we could check? Really wary to make it privileged though. Regards, fedd

...29:01_daily > > autosnap_2019-09-01_13:29:01_hourly > > autosnap_2019-09-01_13:44:09_frequently > > I'm not saying this is what your problem is, but if this is FreeBSD < 12, then MNAMELEN in mount.h is 88. FreeBSD 12 bumps this limit to 1024. This means that you should be wary of automatic snapshot schemes that bump up toward this limit. Otherwise, the snapshots will not appear in shadow_copy2. One way to quickly tell if you're hitting the limit is to "cd" into the snapdir and "ls -l". If you've hit it then it will fail with ENAMETOOLONG.

I am developing an R package for internal use, and eventually for public release. My understanding is that there is no easy way to avoid copying function arguments in R (i.e. we don't have the concept of pointers in R), which makes me wary of freely creating chains of function calls since each function call implies data copy overhead. Is the above assessment fair? Are there any good write-ups on best practices for writing efficient R libraries that take into consideration the above-mentioned limitations, and any others that might ex...

I am wont to decode a speex 11kbps 8kHz 16bit to a raw data 8kHz 16bit LSB on a c5509. Trying to understand the "testenc-TI-C5x.c" exsample, but it looks to me wary complicated. Is there more documentation for the exsample or a decoder exsample available? Can somebody help? Peter -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20060423/5435bdfe/attachment.htm

...ys: "Do not compile from source yourself unless you are certain you have to or want to" Okay, fine. So I look for an RPM. But it doesn't have those, it only has repositories for Fedora and Red Hat. A while back I messed up my system by installing repositories for Fedora, so I'm wary of doing that kind of thing again. I tried a YUM search for gstreamer to see if it was available on DAG, but no luck there. Does this mean I fall into the category of compiling myself because I have to? The warning on the web site makes it sound like this is something for experts to do. Dave

Great! I'll circle around to this at some point. Despite the "obvious" nature of it I still am wary of underestimating the cruftiness of the buildbots, so I'll probably do it some time at night when the bots are mostly green so that I can easily see if any bots *are* broken by this. -- Sean Silva On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 6:55 PM, Chris Matthews <chris.matthews at apple.com> wrote: &gt...

...al. They are the result of a saturated loglinear model, and I've run the same code across about 400 tables, all of which result in sum(obs-exp)=0, except for this one. I can't figure it out? Anyway, I need help understanding why 118 and 118 are not really the same. I appreciate some may be wary of downloading my .Rdata file (I'm on ubuntu if that's any consolation), but I don't know how else to ask this quesiton! Thanks! Maja Z. -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/identical-values-not-so-identical-newbie-help-please-tp3346078p3346078.html Sent f...

Hey all, I am wondering if anyone has given thought to using REST / XPath as querying mechanism. That way you could have a URL that actually maps to a collection of records (objects, really) that meet a certain criteria and that are sorted a certain way. Mike Pence

...CPU usage is Cpu(s): 1.1% us, 0.6% sy, 0.0% ni, 97.9% id, 0.2% wa, 0.1% hi, 0.1%si. Can't see any new processes that would cause the load, just wondering is there any way to try and track down whats actually causing this? It's not excessive load, but want to add some new services and wary now, its something that seems wrong given the sudden increase at 4am (think thats when some o.s housekeeping tasks are normally scheduled, but there's none running that I can see that started today). Just hoping someone may have some tips on checking whats always waiting or how to isolate what...

...e alpha-quailty, but I've also read one or two interview with the developers stating that 3.0 is actually more stable than 2.2 at this point and that they recommend using it. My main concern is that the LDAP schema will change again before the final 3.0 release - this is also what is making me wary of using 2.2, since the schemas are pretty different should we want to upgrade to 3.x in the future. Any advice is much appreciated. thanks, -jkl

This sounds like a good idea to me! I can’t think of any common platform where you can’t get 2.7. Lets get rid of that legacy cruft! > On Feb 23, 2016, at 1:32 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote: > > Seems reasonable to me. Chris? > > On Mon, Feb 22, 2016, 8:40 PM Sean Silva via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at

...be obtaining a VoIP phone system when we do. Right now, it's down to the 3com nbx100 series and *. Having lurked on *-user for a few weeks and having seen the nifty features of asterisk, I'm convinced. The price difference has pretty much sold my superiors. However, they're slightly wary of the whole open-source thing. They have no way of knowing, for certain, that asterisk is production-quality until they sign the check and find out. I've been asked by my CTO and CEO to get some testimonials and/or case studies of asterisk in production use in small office / small callcenter...

...eality because of file formats (MP3 support in HTML5 isn't supported yet like MP4 in video, or wasn't in previous versions...) you need a Flash fallback unless you want to simultaneously stream OGG and MP3 - given the fact very few of the directories and players support OGG I'm a little wary of devoting a stream to it. I'm sure it's wonderful yaddayaddayadda for the geeks but in a Flash streaming world, MP3 gets the shout(cast). seems to be much more compatible - my Pure Contour Internet radio can't play OGG for example, but does do AAC and MP3. So yes you do need a Flash...

...project in my college, and i > > want to build a system which has three live videos from cameras, then > > i want to transmit those video in single stream. The Receiver can > > choose which video that receiver want to see. > > It is certainly possible. You'll have to be wary of the latency which > might be introduced (eg, waiting for each video stream to have a > page ready, before being able to decide wich to output to the output > stream first). Also, bear in mind that your stream will obviously have > three times the bitrate of a single one. > > &g...

...to be linking the output of your compiler with LLVM libraries, they'd be what you'd use to build the compiler itself. However, g++ should find the required function anyway. It's possible you have to add a "-lstdc++" (or -lc++ if you're using libc++, etc). But it makes me wary about the rest of your toolchain. Tim.

...nato Golin via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: > On 24 February 2016 at 19:49, Sean Silva via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> Great! I'll circle around to this at some point. Despite the "obvious" >> nature of it I still am wary of underestimating the cruftiness of the >> buildbots, so I'll probably do it some time at night when the bots are >> mostly green so that I can easily see if any bots *are* broken by this. > > While at it, can you call "env python2" in the shebang line? It makes &gt...

...Golin via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On 24 February 2016 at 19:49, Sean Silva via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> Great! I'll circle around to this at some point. Despite the "obvious" >> nature of it I still am wary of underestimating the cruftiness of the >> buildbots, so I'll probably do it some time at night when the bots are >> mostly green so that I can easily see if any bots *are* broken by this. > > While at it, can you call "env python2" in the shebang line? It makes &g...