search for: warlock1999

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "warlock1999".

2017 Aug 28
5
ERROR during high volume MoH dialplan
...lists.digium.com> on behalf of Richard Mudgett <rmudgett at digium.com> Sent: Monday, August 28, 2017 2:17 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] ERROR during high volume MoH dialplan On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 1:04 PM, Joseph Smith <warlock1999 at hotmail.com<mailto:warlock1999 at hotmail.com>> wrote: Hello, I've recently setup a small load test against an instance of Asterisks. I've tested on asterisk 13.5 and 14.6 with the same results. I think you mean 13.15.0 as the excessive ref count trap is not in 13.5.0. I am...
2017 Aug 28
2
ERROR during high volume MoH dialplan
Hello, I've recently setup a small load test against an instance of Asterisks. I've tested on asterisk 13.5 and 14.6 with the same results. I am using PJSIP. My dial plan is, [test] exten => 1001,1,Answer exten => 1001,n,MusicOnHold(15) exten => 1001,n,Hangup I am using SIPP to test. I can share XML if desired but it simply waits on the line while music plays for 8
2017 Sep 01
2
ERROR during high volume MoH dialplan
Thanks for the feedback. I do agree with having multiple smaller servers. When I was first approached with this task I mentioned as much. However, the current desire is to work with already existing hardware. That is out of my hands at the moment unless it just can't be done. I will explore Freeswitch a bit soon to compare it as well. I am struggling to find what the bottle neck is in
2017 Sep 01
2
ERROR during high volume MoH dialplan
...t;tony at softins.co.uk> Sent: Friday, September 1, 2017 11:01 AM To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] ERROR during high volume MoH dialplan In article <CY4PR2201MB14643C2177C953FA27AC9E2BA8920 at CY4PR2201MB1464.namprd22.prod.outlook.com>, Joseph Smith <warlock1999 at hotmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks for the feedback. > > I do agree with having multiple smaller servers. When I was first approached with this task I mentioned as much. > However, the current desire is to work with already existing hardware. That is out of my hands at the moment...