search for: warasin

...1.15 is assigned to the mac adress of the interface eth1. Needless to say that this happens only from time to time. If i cleanup the arp table sometimes it went alright. What's wrong with my installation? Thank you in advance! peter -- :: e n d i a n :: open source - open minds :: peter warasin :: http://www.endian.com :: peter@endian.com

...ping the device before. is this normal behaviour because the bridge first has to learn the mac-address? i thought before tcp connections arp requests will be sent, too :) ah.. the same behaviour on a system with kernel 2.4.29. bye peter -- :: e n d i a n :: open source - open minds :: peter warasin :: http://www.endian.it :: peter@endian.it

...200 iptables -A OUTGOINGMARK -o eth1 -j MARK --set-mark 200 iptables -A INCOMINGMARK -i eth2 -j MARK --set-mark 201 iptables -A OUTGOINGMARK -o eth2 -j MARK --set-mark 201 thank you in advance, any help would be greatly appreciated peter -- :: e n d i a n :: open source - open minds :: peter warasin :: http://www.endian.it :: peter@endian.it

Hello guys, I am still in doubt about this kind of server. So my question is about the "prio" at routing tables like: I have 3 tables in /etc/iproute2/rt_tables: 201 201 202 202 222 222 In table 201 there is the rules about my internet link (frame relay) that comes into eth0. So I made this route into it: [root@ns2 iproute2]# ip route show table 201 default via

Hi, I''ve been implementing a load balancing solution using CONNMARK, based on solution described by Luciano Ruete at [1]. Gracias por el post y por apuntar en la dirección correcta Luciano! Once implemented, I''ve found that due to some reason packets aren''t properly marked (or improperly remarked) and sent out using the wrong interface. My topo setup is: