search for: wake_bit_funct

...block_sync_page+0x3c/0x50 Nov 1 13:52:13 localhost kernel: [sync_page+70/80] sync_page+0x46/0x50 Nov 1 13:52:13 localhost kernel: [__wait_on_bit_lock+94/112] __wait_on_bit_lock+0x5e/0x70 Nov 1 13:52:13 localhost kernel: [sync_page+0/80] sync_page+0x0/0x50 Nov 1 13:52:13 localhost kernel: [wake_bit_function+0/96] wake_bit_function+0x0/0x60 Nov 1 13:52:13 localhost kernel: [__lock_page+145/160] __lock_page +0x91/0xa0 Nov 1 13:52:13 localhost kernel: [wake_bit_function+0/96] wake_bit_function+0x0/0x60 Nov 1 13:52:13 localhost kernel: [page_cache_readahead+218/720] page_cache_readahead+0x...

...timeofday+0x10/0x29 [<ffffffff80028bb2>] sync_page+0x0/0x43 [<ffffffff800637de>] io_schedule+0x3f/0x67 [<ffffffff80028bf0>] sync_page+0x3e/0x43 [<ffffffff80063922>] __wait_on_bit_lock+0x36/0x66 [<ffffffff8003f980>] __lock_page+0x5e/0x64 [<ffffffff800a34d5>] wake_bit_function+0x0/0x23 [<ffffffff8000c425>] do_generic_mapping_read+0x1df/0x359 [<ffffffff8000d251>] file_read_actor+0x0/0x159 [<ffffffff8000c6eb>] __generic_file_aio_read+0x14c/0x198 [<ffffffff80016eb7>] generic_file_aio_read+0x36/0x3b [<ffffffff8000cf39>] do_sync_read+0xc7...

...;] ? _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0xd/0xe [163440.614295] [<ffffffff8130bafe>] ? __wait_on_bit+0x41/0x70 [163440.614301] [<ffffffff8110ed8a>] ? sync_buffer+0x0/0x40 [163440.614306] [<ffffffff8130bb98>] ? out_of_line_wait_on_bit+0x6b/0x77 [163440.614312] [<ffffffff81065d38>] ? wake_bit_function+0x0/0x23 [163440.614318] [<ffffffff8110f1e9>] ? sync_dirty_buffer+0x5b/0x93 [163440.614326] [<ffffffffa00b4e04>] ? journal_dirty_data+0xd1/0x1b0 [jbd] [163440.614339] [<ffffffffa0113f1f>] ? ext3_journal_dirty_data+0xf/0x34 [ext3] [163440.614347] [<ffffffffa01123f9>] ?...

...sync_page+0x4b/0x4f Jul 8 11:49:40 xback2 kernel: [74920.681032] [<ffffffff8147482f>] __wait_on_bit_lock+0x46/0x8f Jul 8 11:49:40 xback2 kernel: [74920.681032] [<ffffffff810d8075>] __lock_page+0x66/0x68 Jul 8 11:49:40 xback2 kernel: [74920.681032] [<ffffffff8106f2ab>] ? wake_bit_function+0x0/0x31 Jul 8 11:49:40 xback2 kernel: [74920.681032] [<ffffffffa0430cf9>] lock_page+0x3a/0x3e [btrfs] Jul 8 11:49:40 xback2 kernel: [74920.681032] [<ffffffffa04310a6>] lock_delalloc_pages+0xad/0x1af [btrfs] Jul 8 11:49:40 xback2 kernel: [74920.681032] [<ffffffffa0432f7c&g...

...sraid3 kernel: [<ffffffff80063a16>] __wait_on_bit+0x40/0x6e Jun 7 19:45:21 sraid3 kernel: [<ffffffff800ec2a2>] inode_wait+0x0/0xd Jun 7 19:45:21 sraid3 kernel: [<ffffffff80063ab0>] out_of_line_wait_on_bit+0x6c/0x78 Jun 7 19:45:21 sraid3 kernel: [<ffffffff800a0aec>] wake_bit_function+0x0/0x23 Jun 7 19:45:21 sraid3 kernel: [<ffffffff8003dbbf>] ifind_fast+0x6e/0x83 Jun 7 19:45:21 sraid3 kernel: [<ffffffff80023290>] iget_locked+0x59/0x149 Jun 7 19:45:21 sraid3 kernel: [<ffffffff88cf0b0f>] :ext4:ext4_iget+0x16/0x65a Jun 7 19:45:21 sraid3 kernel: [<...

...buffer+0x2b/0x35 Jan 25 21:01:24 turing kernel: [<c02ec013>] __wait_on_bit+0x2b/0x51 Jan 25 21:01:24 turing kernel: [<c02ec0a7>] out_of_line_wait_on_bit+0x6e/0x76 Jan 25 21:01:24 turing kernel: [<c0162df3>] sync_buffer+0x0/0x35 Jan 25 21:01:24 turing kernel: [<c01347a6>] wake_bit_function+0x0/0x34 Jan 25 21:01:24 turing kernel: [<c0166481>] submit_bh+0x124/0x14a Jan 25 21:01:24 turing kernel: [<c01347a6>] wake_bit_function+0x0/0x34 Jan 25 21:01:24 turing kernel: [<c0164a0f>] __bread_slow+0x70/0x86 Jan 25 21:01:24 turing kernel: [<c0164c06>] __bread+0x2...

...20 vmail kernel: [<ffffffff80063a0a>] __wait_on_bit+0x40/0x6e May 2 22:48:20 vmail kernel: [<ffffffff8001558e>] sync_buffer+0x0/0x3f May 2 22:48:20 vmail kernel: [<ffffffff80063aa4>] out_of_line_wait_on_bit+0x6c/0x78 May 2 22:48:20 vmail kernel: [<ffffffff800a34d5>] wake_bit_function+0x0/0x23 May 2 22:48:20 vmail kernel: [<ffffffff88033a47>] :jbd:journal_commit_transaction+0x559/0x10c2 May 2 22:48:20 vmail kernel: [<ffffffff8003d7be>] lock_timer_base+0x1b/0x3c May 2 22:48:20 vmail kernel: [<ffffffff8004ad59>] try_to_del_timer_sync+0x7f/0x88 May 2...

Hello, I have a 5.5TB Btrfs filesystem on top of a md-raid 5 device. Now if i run some file operations like find, i get these messages. kernel is 2.6.38.5-1 on arch linux May 5 14:15:12 mail kernel: [13559.089713] parent transid verify failed on 3062073683968 wanted 5181 found 5188 May 5 14:15:12 mail kernel: [13559.089834] parent transid verify failed on 3062073683968 wanted 5181 found 5188

...fffff8111a1ad>] block_sync_page+0x42/0x44 [<ffffffff810bf0fb>] sync_page+0x3f/0x48 [<ffffffff810bf10d>] sync_page_killable+0x9/0x30 [<ffffffff814e7a2f>] __wait_on_bit_lock+0x41/0x8a [<ffffffff810bf040>] __lock_page_killable+0x61/0x68 [<ffffffff8106486b>] ? wake_bit_function+0x0/0x2e [<ffffffff8103e0af>] ? __might_sleep+0x3d/0x127 [<ffffffff810c0b1f>] generic_file_aio_read+0x3db/0x594 [<ffffffff810763f0>] ? __lock_acquire+0x9a5/0x1767 [<ffffffff8100fd52>] ? check_events+0x12/0x20 [<ffffffff810f8e16>] do_sync_read+0xe3/0x120...

...0x0/0x3f [<ffffffff800637de>] io_schedule+0x3f/0x67 [<ffffffff800155dd>] sync_buffer+0x3b/0x3f [<ffffffff80063a0a>] __wait_on_bit+0x40/0x6e [<ffffffff800155a2>] sync_buffer+0x0/0x3f [<ffffffff80063aa4>] out_of_line_wait_on_bit+0x6c/0x78 [<ffffffff800a34d6>] wake_bit_function+0x0/0x23 [<ffffffff88033e56>] :jbd:journal_commit_transaction+0x968/0x10c2 [<ffffffff8003d7d9>] lock_timer_base+0x1b/0x3c [<ffffffff880376a3>] :jbd:kjournald+0xc1/0x213 [<ffffffff800a34a8>] autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x2e [<ffffffff880375e2>] :jbd:kjournald+0...

...10bfa79>] ? sync_buffer+0x3b/0x40 [902361.152448] [<ffffffff812f7431>] ? __wait_on_bit+0x41/0x70 [902361.152452] [<ffffffff810bfa3e>] ? sync_buffer+0x0/0x40 [902361.152454] [<ffffffff812f74cb>] ? out_of_line_wait_on_bit+0x6b/0x77 [902361.152460] [<ffffffff810444d8>] ? wake_bit_function+0x0/0x23 [902361.152464] [<ffffffff810f6177>] ? ext3_bread+0x4c/0x6d [902361.152468] [<ffffffff810faa22>] ? htree_dirblock_to_tree+0x33/0x13e [902361.152472] [<ffffffff810b0655>] ? dput+0x23/0x13d [902361.152475] [<ffffffff810faba9>] ? ext3_htree_fill_tree+0x7c/0x1e7...

Hi, Recently, I made a btrfs to use. And I met slowness problem. Trying to diag it. I found this: 1. dd if=/dev/zero of=test count=1024 bs=1MB This is fast, at about 25MB/s, and reasonable iowait. 2. dd if=/dev/zero of=test count=1 bs=1GB This is pretty slow, at about 1.5MB/s, and 90%+ iowait, constantly. May I know why it works like this? Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the

...lt;ffffffff812f9939>] ? io_schedule+0x73/0xb7 [ 240.587287] [<ffffffff810b3c1e>] ? sync_page+0x41/0x46 [ 240.588202] [<ffffffff812f9e46>] ? __wait_on_bit+0x41/0x70 [ 240.589314] [<ffffffff810b3da2>] ? wait_on_page_bit+0x6b/0x71 [ 240.590630] [<ffffffff81064a1c>] ? wake_bit_function+0x0/0x23 [ 240.591906] [<ffffffff810bb9ea>] ? pagevec_lookup_tag+0x1a/0x21 [ 240.592954] [<ffffffff810b4577>] ? wait_on_page_writeback_range+0x69/0x11b [ 240.594403] [<ffffffff810b536e>] ? filemap_write_and_wait+0x26/0x32 [ 240.595563] [<ffffffffa02c0d35>] ? nfs_s...

...lt;ffffffff812f9939>] ? io_schedule+0x73/0xb7 [ 240.587287] [<ffffffff810b3c1e>] ? sync_page+0x41/0x46 [ 240.588202] [<ffffffff812f9e46>] ? __wait_on_bit+0x41/0x70 [ 240.589314] [<ffffffff810b3da2>] ? wait_on_page_bit+0x6b/0x71 [ 240.590630] [<ffffffff81064a1c>] ? wake_bit_function+0x0/0x23 [ 240.591906] [<ffffffff810bb9ea>] ? pagevec_lookup_tag+0x1a/0x21 [ 240.592954] [<ffffffff810b4577>] ? wait_on_page_writeback_range+0x69/0x11b [ 240.594403] [<ffffffff810b536e>] ? filemap_write_and_wait+0x26/0x32 [ 240.595563] [<ffffffffa02c0d35>] ? nfs_s...

..._wait_on_bit+0x41/0x70 Aug 29 06:28:53 vm2 kernel: [53400.204181] [<ffffffff8110f19a>] ? sync_buffer+0x0/0x40 Aug 29 06:28:53 vm2 kernel: [53400.204185] [<ffffffff8130c711>] ? out_of_line_wait_on_bit+0x6b/0x77 Aug 29 06:28:53 vm2 kernel: [53400.204190] [<ffffffff81065f34>] ? wake_bit_function+0x0/0x23 Aug 29 06:28:53 vm2 kernel: [53400.204202] [<ffffffffa04bf824>] ? ocfs2_read_blocks+0x55d/0x6c2 [ocfs2] Aug 29 06:28:53 vm2 kernel: [53400.204208] [<ffffffff8100eccf>] ? xen_restore_fl_direct_end+0x0/0x1 Aug 29 06:28:53 vm2 kernel: [53400.204217] [<ffffffffa04db9a1&g...

Hi Orion, no, I still have this problem. I delay working on it as I the latest updates have not been installed on the server and on the client. I'll work again on this problem as soon as possible. Thanks Charles for your detailed information on how to track this problem. I'll check all these metrics. I have several clients for this nfs server and the problem seems only to occur from the

I do not mean to be argumentative, but I have to admit a little frustration with Gluster. I know an enormous emount of effort has gone into this product, and I just can't believe that with all the effort behind it and so many people using it, it could be so fragile. So here goes. Perhaps someone here can point to the error of my ways. I really want this to work because it would be ideal

hi Geoffrey, Since you are saying it happens on all types of volumes, lets do the following: 1) Create a dist-repl volume 2) Set the options etc you need. 3) enable gluster volume profile using "gluster volume profile <volname> start" 4) run the work load 5) give output of "gluster volume profile <volname> info" Repeat the steps above on new and old

...nc_page+0x0/0x43 [<ffffffff800e4df4>] blkdev_readpage+0x0/0xf [<ffffffff800637ea>] io_schedule+0x3f/0x67 [<ffffffff80028b82>] sync_page+0x3e/0x43 [<ffffffff8006392e>] __wait_on_bit_lock+0x36/0x66 [<ffffffff8003fce0>] __lock_page+0x5e/0x64 [<ffffffff800a0b8d>] wake_bit_function+0x0/0x23 [<ffffffff800c67ba>] read_cache_page+0xba/0x110 [<ffffffff8010a685>] read_dev_sector+0x28/0xcf [<ffffffff8010c061>] read_lba+0x49/0xac [<ffffffff800dbba2>] alternate_node_alloc+0x70/0x8c [<ffffffff8010c2f0>] efi_partition+0x99/0x5d4 [<ffffffff880a8917...

...13528>] io_schedule+0x18/0x20 > [11159.499104] [<ffffffffb9911f11>] bit_wait_io+0x11/0x50 > [11159.499107] [<ffffffffb9911ac1>] __wait_on_bit_lock+0x61/0xc0 > [11159.499113] [<ffffffffb9393634>] __lock_page+0x74/0x90 > [11159.499118] [<ffffffffb92bc210>] ? wake_bit_function+0x40/0x40 > [11159.499121] [<ffffffffb9394154>] __find_lock_page+0x54/0x70 > [11159.499125] [<ffffffffb9394e85>] grab_cache_page_write_begin+0x55/0xc0 > [11159.499130] [<ffffffffb9484b76>] iomap_write_begin+0x66/0x100 > [11159.499135] [<ffffffffb9484edf>]...