search for: wahetever

...thers I don't know. Most of them are not as good as openssh and some of them are downright horrible to use (I'm looking at you, GNU lsh...) but the fact that some alternatives exists is what's important here. You also must take into account that some people want to have openssl 1.1 for wahetever reason (for example, TLS1.3 support in 1.1.1). For them, having to cope with multiple versions of the openssl library is not going to work well. Distro maintainers will also be rightly pissed off if only one important program does not want to take the jump. > So, such resistance has a chance to...

Hello everybody, ? ? I saw that another discussion about OpenSSL 1.1 support started on this list, and I'd like to know what is the current status about this. >From what I understand, at least ?one patch set already exists: ? ? a github PR [1] from , Kurt Roeckx announced on the list in september 2016 [2] ? and which also exist as a fedora patch [3]? (I haven't checked the details,

...gt; good as openssh and some of them are downright horrible to use (I'm looking >> at you, GNU lsh...) but the fact that some alternatives exists is what's >> important here. >> >> You also must take into account that some people want to have openssl 1.1 >> for wahetever reason (for example, TLS1.3 support in 1.1.1). For them, >> having to cope with multiple versions of the openssl library is not going >> to work well. Distro maintainers will also be rightly pissed off if only >> one important program does not want to take the jump. >> >&...