Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "wahetev".
Did you mean:
waheed
2017 Jun 23
2
OpenSSL 1.1 support status : what next?
...thers I don't know. Most of them are not as
good as openssh and some of them are downright horrible to use (I'm looking
at you, GNU lsh...) but the fact that some alternatives exists is what's
important here.
You also must take into account that some people want to have openssl 1.1
for wahetever reason (for example, TLS1.3 support in 1.1.1). For them,
having to cope with multiple versions of the openssl library is not going
to work well. Distro maintainers will also be rightly pissed off if only
one important program does not want to take the jump.
> So, such resistance has a chance...
2017 Jun 22
2
OpenSSL 1.1 support status : what next?
Hello everybody,
? ?
I saw that another discussion about OpenSSL 1.1 support started on this
list, and I'd like to know what is the current status about this.
>From what I understand, at least
?one
patch set already exists:
? ?
a github PR [1] from , Kurt Roeckx announced on the list in september 2016
[2]
? and which also exist as a fedora patch [3]? (I haven't checked the
details,
2017 Jun 23
5
OpenSSL 1.1 support status : what next?
...gt; good as openssh and some of them are downright horrible to use (I'm looking
>> at you, GNU lsh...) but the fact that some alternatives exists is what's
>> important here.
>>
>> You also must take into account that some people want to have openssl 1.1
>> for wahetever reason (for example, TLS1.3 support in 1.1.1). For them,
>> having to cope with multiple versions of the openssl library is not going
>> to work well. Distro maintainers will also be rightly pissed off if only
>> one important program does not want to take the jump.
>>
>...