search for: wager

...r decades, for good reasons. > If Joe User's mind "works differently", Joe needs to make the effort to > adapt to existing conventions instead of expecting conventions (and > thereby other people) to change. > > -Ralph > That is the opinion of some. But - I would wager that over 95% of the time when someone hits the reply button on a list post, their intent is to reply to the list. If netiquette is why that sometimes fails, then netiquette does not match common usage and is the problem. I would wager that most people are clueless to how mail headers work, no...

Any simple way to take a (2D) table and 'rotate' it so all the rows become columns and the columns rows? I'll wager there is a simple way ;) - but I can't find it :(

...ss will be something related > to hot-cold code splitting). > IIUC, it's just using optsize instead of optnone. The idea is that, if the code really doesn't run often/at all, then the performance impact of reducing the size is negligible, but the size impact is considerable. I'd wager that optsize could even be faster than optnone, as it would delete a lot of useless code... but not noticeable, as it wouldn't run much. This is an idea that we (Verona Language) are interested in, too. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://...

...ocally to the server would impact processing time). I'm trying to avoid minimal per-user setup hassle and perceived inconvenience of running R. The system should be able to handle about 5 intensive jobs and up to 20 users simultaneously. Any advice would be appreciated! Thanks, Carrie Greene Wager, PhD New England Research Institutes Watertown, MA [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

...een talked about with the LLVM_implicit_value (or was it LLVM_explicit_value? I forget)) - and synthesizing artificial variables in the backend rather than trying to track which variable a pointer points to. I think this would keep the impact on optimizations smaller & would be more general. My wager/belief/instinct is that most cases won't be pointing to a named variable with a single level of indirection, but to unnamed variables, multiple levels of indirection, etc. > I get the feeling that allowing more options here will come > out as more conditions / branching elsewhere, in a...

Hello, #define likely(x) __builtin_expect((x),1) // switch like char * b(int e) { if (likely(e == 0)) return "0"; else if (e == 1) return "1"; else return "f"; } GCC correctly prefers the first case: b(int): mov eax, OFFSET FLAT:.LC0 test edi, edi jne .L7 ret But Clang seems to ignore _builtin_expect hints in this case.

I am using observe_field on a number of multi-selects and checkbox form elements whose values would normally come in as arrays on a normal (non-Ajax) form post. I understand that by using the :with => ''name'' I will get name=value in the request.raw_post however if the field I am submitting has mutliple values and the name is of the form ''name[]'', I get

On Wed, 2019-07-31 at 09:32 -0400, John Chludzinski wrote: > After finally completing and trying to reboot, the machine goes into > "Emergency Mode" and asks that I log in as root. That fails and the machine > becomes completely unresponsive. > > I tried the minimum install and got the same result. > Try booting from a live CD to see if that gives you any info. TBH

On 12/01/2018 05:00 PM, Hendrik Boom wrote: > > There's an extensive email etiquette post somewhere on the net > explaining why setting 'reply-to' to the list is a bad idea. > > Reply-to is intended for the sender to explain that replies shouldn't > be sent to the obvious sending address, but to another address. > This is essential if, say, the sender is

On 02/12/2018 03:05, Michael A. Peters wrote: [...] > But - I would wager that over 95% of the time when someone hits the > reply button on a list post, their intent is to reply to the list. Even if it's 99%: What is the lesser risk if someone get's it wrong? Apart from the situation that people send mails over the mailing list with "for X.Y." in t...

...ng, my guess will be something related to hot-cold code splitting). IIUC, it's just using optsize instead of optnone. The idea is that, if the code really doesn't run often/at all, then the performance impact of reducing the size is negligible, but the size impact is considerable. I'd wager that optsize could even be faster than optnone, as it would delete a lot of useless code... but not noticeable, as it wouldn't run much. This is an idea that we (Verona Language) are interested in, too. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://...

I did https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37368 2018-05-09 20:33 GMT+02:00 Dávid Bolvanský <david.bolvansky at gmail.com>: > I did > > https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37368 > > 2018-05-09 20:29 GMT+02:00 David Zarzycki <dave at znu.io>: > >> I’d wager that the if-else chain is being converted to a "switch >> statement” during an optimization pass and the __builtin_expect() hint is >> lost. Can you file a bug? https://bugs.llvm.org >> >> >> On May 9, 2018, at 1:57 PM, Dávid Bolvanský via llvm-dev < >> l...

On Sun, Dec 02, 2018 at 03:58:53AM +0100, Bernd Petrovitsch wrote: > On 02/12/2018 03:05, Michael A. Peters wrote: > [...] > > But - I would wager that over 95% of the time when someone hits the > > reply button on a list post, their intent is to reply to the list. > > Even if it's 99%: What is the lesser risk if someone get's it wrong? > > Apart from the situation that people send mails over the mailing list >...

Hey All, I am looking for an example of the proper config settings for background rb to run my rails app and my backgroundrb instance on separate machines (or more precisely, to have a rails cluster with one backgroundrb machine). Does anyone have such examples? Thanks! -Noah -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

> On 2/24/19 9:01 PM, Jobst Schmalenbach wrote: >> I tried to delete the MDX, I removed the disks by failing them, then >> removing each array md0, md1 and md2. >> I also did >> >> dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdX bs=512 seek=$(($(blockdev --getsz >> /dev/sdX)-1024)) count=1024 > > > Clearing the initial sectors doesn't do anything to clear the

Hello, i use successfully mysql-quotasystem with dovecot 1.2.11 on different servers except for mysql 4.0 servers dovecot internally uses sql: "ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE" which was introduced in mysql 4.1 Is there a chance to make this statement mysql 4.0 compatible or should i update mysql? i want to avoid updating mysql because some old software is running which is not compatible to

Hello-- I've been making note of a local situation that seems somewhat irritating, and thought maybe some of you experts out there, might be able to propose some alternatives. The situation goes like this: Rural Wyoming. Cody, to be exact, but I'd wager that you could almost anywhere in Wyoming and find similar situations. The county gov. phones and the school system phones do not provide callerid. Why? because they bought T1's at like $1k/mo instead of separate lines at $100/line/mo each. Saves them a ton of money. Has been for years. 5 or...

...ky at gmail.com <mailto:david.bolvansky at gmail.com>>: > I did > > https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37368 <https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37368> > > 2018-05-09 20:29 GMT+02:00 David Zarzycki <dave at znu.io <mailto:dave at znu.io>>: > I’d wager that the if-else chain is being converted to a "switch statement” during an optimization pass and the __builtin_expect() hint is lost. Can you file a bug? https://bugs.llvm.org <https://bugs.llvm.org/> > > >> On May 9, 2018, at 1:57 PM, Dávid Bolvanský via llvm-dev <llvm...

...from a disk image; some by dragging the image to the "Applications" folder, some by clicking on an actual installer. Even in OS X Server, Apple tries to move away from the terminal (though not so successfully yet). It's not a big deal by any means. However, I'd be willing to wager that Icecast would substantially increase its Mac user base with a simple GUI installer. Would make my life easier to :) > Personally, I've no idea how to go about creating an OSX installer. > Would it even be able to check and fulfill dependencies? Or would it > simply need to carr...

Hi all, I''m just starting to look at using Augeas with Puppet to manage some of our configuration files. I thought I would start with a simple task of removing an entry from the /etc/hosts file. I''m not finding it simple though! We have a number of hosts with entries in the /etc/hosts file like this: 127.0.1.1 hostname We would like to remove these lines. Now I know this can