search for: waffly

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "waffly".

Did you mean: waffle
2007 Sep 11
3
metadata on the wiki
So wiki discussion on the new metadata format is ongoing. I'd like to move some things about a bit. MDMF is a discussion of the metadata XML format itself, Metadata gives some background an overview and a few old sample cases. I'm not sure how many people read the wiki talk page so I thought I'd ask here if there were any objections before doing it. What would most likely happen
2007 Sep 11
0
metadata on the wiki
On 12/09/2007, Ian Malone <ibmalone@gmail.com> wrote: > So wiki discussion on the new metadata format > is ongoing. I'd like to move some things about > a bit. Hi Ian, I find the existing Metadata page a bit waffly, and I think we could improve it to be more constructive. Perhaps it should simply give a very brief introduction to how we approach metadata, and links to the various wiki pages relating to the various mechanisms and proposals. It seems that what we are working towards is a collection of mutuall...
2008 Feb 02
0
Xen 3.2 Debian 2.6.18, Remote Serial console only, grub config needed
...s - grub.conf config advice needed the subject says it all - anyone who knows the answer can stop reading and hit "send" with a few lines of grub.conf - however, for those people who are bored, intrigued, or prefer a little less obtuse requests for help, here''s a little bit more waffly version: i have a debian/testing system which is, rather unusually, on a dual-xeon system where the _only_ access i have, to this leased server, is via a serial console. yes - the BIOS boots over the serial console not the VGA screen. (for those people who know blackcatnetworks, it''s on...
2007 Sep 14
4
metadata on the wiki
...7 05:10:12 Conrad Parker wrote: > On 12/09/2007, Ian Malone <ibmalone@gmail.com> wrote: > > So wiki discussion on the new metadata format > > is ongoing. I'd like to move some things about > > a bit. > > Hi Ian, > > I find the existing Metadata page a bit waffly, and I think we could > improve it to be more constructive. > > Perhaps it should simply give a very brief introduction to how we > approach metadata, and links to the various wiki pages relating to the > various mechanisms and proposals. > > It seems that what we are working t...