search for: waffli

So wiki discussion on the new metadata format is ongoing. I'd like to move some things about a bit. MDMF is a discussion of the metadata XML format itself, Metadata gives some background an overview and a few old sample cases. I'm not sure how many people read the wiki talk page so I thought I'd ask here if there were any objections before doing it. What would most likely happen

On 12/09/2007, Ian Malone <ibmalone@gmail.com> wrote: > So wiki discussion on the new metadata format > is ongoing. I'd like to move some things about > a bit. Hi Ian, I find the existing Metadata page a bit waffly, and I think we could improve it to be more constructive. Perhaps it should simply give a very brief introduction to how we approach metadata, and links to the

let''s try this with a shorter subject, which was originally this, which probably tripped the list-admin-approval triggers.... Xen 3.2 Debian 2.6.18 on Dual Xeon with Remote Serial access - grub.conf config advice needed the subject says it all - anyone who knows the answer can stop reading and hit "send" with a few lines of grub.conf - however, for those people who are bored,

The biggest problem with Vorbis comments are too loose specifications and too little standardisation. Another problem is attribution of involved parties. Currently only the ARTIST field name is supported in software. More standardised field names need to be worked out for organisations and persons involved in the production of the recording. See: