search for: w8

...ink one - maybe final? - problem. How can I tell the difference between drivers for "client" versions of Windows (eg. Windows 7) and server versions of Windows (eg. Windows 2008 Server)? It seems in many or most cases the drivers are identical, eg: $ md5sum viostor/2k12/amd64/* viostor/w8/amd64/* bbe250c13bf891fd7292ccab9908a63a viostor/2k12/amd64/viostor.cat c2fdfc6a47fdc9dd25242441cdf1a68e viostor/2k12/amd64/viostor.inf 5ca2cadca2214b90196755dab06676f4 viostor/2k12/amd64/viostor.pdb 80c5ea60a69f37e965cb277383abd067 viostor/2k12/amd64/viostor.sys bbe250c13bf891fd7292ccab9908a63...

..."Balloon/w7/x86/balloon.pdb", Some win7_32; "Balloon/w7/x86/balloon.sys", Some win7_32; - "Balloon/w7/x86/blnsvr.exe", None; + "Balloon/w7/x86/blnsvr.exe", Some win7_32; "Balloon/w7/x86/blnsvr.pdb", Some win7_32; - "Balloon/w8.1/amd64/WdfCoInstaller01011.dll", None; + "Balloon/w8.1/amd64/WdfCoInstaller01011.dll", Some win8_1_64; "Balloon/w8.1/amd64/balloon.cat", Some win8_1_64; "Balloon/w8.1/amd64/balloon.inf", Some win8_1_64; "Balloon/w8.1/amd64/balloon.pdb"...

v2 -> v3 - Don't make a special case for WdfCoInstaller* files. There is a difference of opinion about whether copying these is necessary, but it seems like it is not harmful. Rich.

Since v1: - Fix a bug in the calculation of lc_basename. By luck this doesn't affect anything given the contents of the current ISO. - Don't copy the WdfCoInstaller*.dll files. Rich.

..."Balloon/w7/x86/balloon.inf", Some win7_32; - "Balloon/w7/x86/balloon.pdb", Some win7_32; - "Balloon/w7/x86/balloon.sys", Some win7_32; - "Balloon/w7/x86/blnsvr.exe", None; - "Balloon/w7/x86/blnsvr.pdb", Some win7_32; - "Balloon/w8.1/amd64/WdfCoInstaller01011.dll", None; - "Balloon/w8.1/amd64/balloon.cat", Some win8_1_64; - "Balloon/w8.1/amd64/balloon.inf", Some win8_1_64; - "Balloon/w8.1/amd64/balloon.pdb", Some win8_1_64; - "Balloon/w8.1/amd64/balloon.sys", Some win8_...

...em. How can I tell the difference > between drivers for "client" versions of Windows (eg. Windows 7) > and server versions of Windows (eg. Windows 2008 Server)? > > It seems in many or most cases the drivers are identical, eg: > > $ md5sum viostor/2k12/amd64/* viostor/w8/amd64/* > bbe250c13bf891fd7292ccab9908a63a viostor/2k12/amd64/viostor.cat > c2fdfc6a47fdc9dd25242441cdf1a68e viostor/2k12/amd64/viostor.inf > 5ca2cadca2214b90196755dab06676f4 viostor/2k12/amd64/viostor.pdb > 80c5ea60a69f37e965cb277383abd067 viostor/2k12/amd64/viostor.sys > bbe250...

...ence > > between drivers for "client" versions of Windows (eg. Windows 7) > > and server versions of Windows (eg. Windows 2008 Server)? > > > > It seems in many or most cases the drivers are identical, eg: > > > > $ md5sum viostor/2k12/amd64/* viostor/w8/amd64/* > > bbe250c13bf891fd7292ccab9908a63a viostor/2k12/amd64/viostor.cat > > c2fdfc6a47fdc9dd25242441cdf1a68e viostor/2k12/amd64/viostor.inf > > 5ca2cadca2214b90196755dab06676f4 viostor/2k12/amd64/viostor.pdb > > 80c5ea60a69f37e965cb277383abd067 viostor/2k12/amd64/vio...

I dual boot w8 and Arch Linux. Both are on the same ssd drive (each OS have of course a partition). Now I would like to virtualize w8 and run it inside Arch Linux using KVM/QEMU and Libvirt. w8 has already been installed on a ntfs partition. As it is brand new, it will not be difficult to reinstall it on a image....

https://github.com/rwmjones/libguestfs/tree/rewrite-virtio-copy-drivers Instead of trying to split and parse elements from virtio-win paths, use the '*.inf' files supplied with the drivers to control how Windows drivers are installed. The following emails best explain how this works: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2015-October/msg00352.html

...rformance testing now. > > > > Your testcase seems specific to x86 – for aarch64 we get the rather spiffy: > > > > _Z3fooPii: // @_Z3fooPii > > // BB#0: // %entry > > add w8, w1, #1 // =1 > > add w9, w1, #2 // =2 > > ldr w8, [x0, w8, sxtw #2] > > ldr w9, [x0, w9, sxtw #2] > > add w8, w9, w8 > > st...

I am using this command to install a w8 guest on my Archlinux host: virt-install --connect qemu:///system --name=tintinVM --ram 4096 --cpu host-model-only --os-variant=win7 --disk /dev/vg0/tintin,size=120,bus=virtio,sparse=false,format=raw --name="tintinVM" --network bridge=virbr0,model=virtio --graphics spice --cdrom /dev/cdr...

...ivers for "client" versions of Windows (eg. Windows 7) > > > and server versions of Windows (eg. Windows 2008 Server)? > > > > > > It seems in many or most cases the drivers are identical, eg: > > > > > > $ md5sum viostor/2k12/amd64/* viostor/w8/amd64/* > > > bbe250c13bf891fd7292ccab9908a63a viostor/2k12/amd64/viostor.cat > > > c2fdfc6a47fdc9dd25242441cdf1a68e viostor/2k12/amd64/viostor.inf > > > 5ca2cadca2214b90196755dab06676f4 viostor/2k12/amd64/viostor.pdb > > > 80c5ea60a69f37e965cb277383abd067 vi...

Patch 1 moves the v2v/fake-virtio-win and v2v/fake-virt-tools directories to the recently created test-data/ hierarchy. This is just refactoring with no functional change at all. Patches 2-4 then extend the available (fake) virtio-win drivers: - Patch 2 adds all of the drivers from the virtio-win RPM. - Patch 3 adds all of the drivers from the virtio-win ISO (which are different from the

I plan to dual boot w8 and Archlinux, and virtualize the same w8 machine with libvirt qemu/kvm. I already did the dual boot. I am now starting the virtualization. My plan was to use the w8 partition as a Disk volume pool [1]. Unfortunately, I didn't noticed only FAT32 was a valid format when I installed w8 on NTFS....

...%cmp = icmp sgt i64 %K, 1 br i1 %cmp, label %for.body, label %for.end for.end: ret void } # Output in AArch64 where you can see redundant add instructions for stored value, store address, and in cmp : foo: .cfi_startproc // BB#0: cmp w0, #2 b.lt .LBB0_3 // BB#1: sxtw x9, w0 add w8, w0, #1 .LBB0_2: add x10, x1, x9, lsl #2 add x9, x9, #1 str w8, [x10, #4] add w8, w8, #1 cmp x9, #1 b.gt .LBB0_2 .LBB0_3: ret

...t.cpp" .globl _Z3fooii .align 2 .type _Z3fooii, at function _Z3fooii: // @_Z3fooii // BB#0: // %entry cbz w0, .LBB0_5 // BB#1: // %for.body.lr.ph mov w8, wzr cmp w0, #0 // =0 cinc w9, w0, lt asr w9, w9, #1 adrp x10, globalvar .LBB0_2: // %for.body // =>This Inner Loop Header: Depth=1 cmp w8, w9...

...AtomicExpandPass will lower the following IR: define i1 @foo(i32* %obj, i32 %old, i32 %new) { entry: %v0 = cmpxchg weak volatile i32* %obj, i32 %old, i32 %new _*release acquire*_ %v1 = extractvalue { i32, i1 } %v0, 1 ret i1 %v1 } to the equivalent of the following on AArch64: _*ldxr w8, [x0]*_ cmp w8, w1 b.ne .LBB0_3 // BB#1: // %cmpxchg.trystore stlxr w8, w2, [x0] cbz w8, .LBB0_4 // BB#2: // %cmpxchg.failure mov w0, wzr ret .LBB0_3: // %c...

...> > for.end: > ret void > } > > > # Output in AArch64 where you can see redundant add instructions for stored value, store address, and in cmp : > > foo: > .cfi_startproc > // BB#0: > cmp w0, #2 > b.lt .LBB0_3 > // BB#1: > sxtw x9, w0 > add w8, w0, #1 > .LBB0_2: > add x10, x1, x9, lsl #2 > add x9, x9, #1 > str w8, [x10, #4] > add w8, w8, #1 > cmp x9, #1 > b.gt .LBB0_2 > .LBB0_3: > ret > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org &...

...>> .type _Z3fooii, at function >> _Z3fooii: // @_Z3fooii >> // BB#0: // %entry >> cbz w0, .LBB0_5 >> // BB#1: // %for.body.lr.ph >> mov w8, wzr >> cmp w0, #0 // =0 >> cinc w9, w0, lt >> asr w9, w9, #1 >> adrp x10, globalvar >> .LBB0_2: // %for.body >> // =>This In...

...aled load. I have a patch to fix it that is going through performance testing now. Your testcase seems specific to x86 – for aarch64 we get the rather spiffy: _Z3fooPii: // @_Z3fooPii // BB#0: // %entry add w8, w1, #1 // =1 add w9, w1, #2 // =2 ldr w8, [x0, w8, sxtw #2] ldr w9, [x0, w9, sxtw #2] add w8, w9, w8 str w8, [x0, w1, sxtw #2]...