search for: vuxml

Hello All, I'd like to bring to your attention the Vulnerabilities and eXposures Markup Language (VuXML) and associated resources. VuXML is a markup language designed for the documentation of security issues within a single package collection. Since about February of this year, we have been diligently documenting vulnerabilities in FreeBSD and the FreeBSD Ports Collection using VuXML. The Project&...

...ote: >>> >>>>eik 2004/03/28 15:44:06 PST >>>> >>>>FreeBSD ports repository >>>> >>>>Modified files: >>>> multimedia/xine Makefile >>>>Log: >>>>Mark forbidden due to an entry in the VuXML database. Don't >>>>forget to add the version which fixes the issues there. >>> >>>FWIW: >>> >>>I didn't mark this port FORBIDDEN when I added the issue to the >>>database because some issues are not very severe. For example, this &g...

Hello Everyone, I have made a few small changes to the VuXML.org web sites, http://www.vuxml.org/freebsd/ (aka vuxml.freebsd.org) and http://www.vuxml.org/openbsd/ - Date-oriented indices (e.g. entry date index) visually group entries from the same date. - The package name index is more useful, listing individual package names. - Each package refer...

Hi! cc'd to freebsd-security@ as somebody there may correct me, cc'd to secteam@ as maintaner of security/portaudit. On Sun, 28 Aug 2005 10:14:21 +0930 Ian Moore wrote: > I've just updated my acroread port to 7.0.1 & was surprised when portaudit > still listed it as a vulnerability. I think it is portaudit problem. > According to

Why wasn't there a FreeBSD security alert for Kerberos 5? Does FreeBSD use the MIT implementation? I got an email from CERT about this. See the attached message below. -- Daniel Rudy >From - Sat Sep 04 03:22:15 2004 X-UIDL: a8f31551eb03ca144862bddc8ccce266 X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 X-Apparently-To: dcrudy@pacbell.net via 206.190.37.79; Fri, 03 Sep 2004

>Submitter-Id: current-users >Originator: Eygene Ryabinkin >Organization: Code Labs >Confidential: no >Synopsis: [vuxml] editors/vim: document netrw issues >Severity: serious >Priority: medium >Category: ports >Class: sw-bug >Release: FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE i386 >Environment: System: FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE i386 >Description: A bunch of vulnerabilities were discovered in Vim: http://www.rdan...

Hello, The current png-1.2.5_4 port has no more vulnerability. It has been corrected by ache@FreeBSD.org yesterday. But when i try to install the updated port to remplace the vulnerable one this is what i am told : # make install ===> png-1.2.5_4 has known vulnerabilities: >> libpng denial-of-service. Reference:

.... So I am bouncing this message to the freebsd-security. Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 11:00:11AM +0000, FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org wrote: > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=128837 > > >Category: ports > >Responsible: freebsd-ports-bugs > >Synopsis: [vuxml] net-mgmt/net-snmp and net-mgmt/net-snmp53: CVE-2008-4309 > >Arrival-Date: Thu Nov 13 11:00:11 UTC 2008 -- Eygene _ ___ _.--. # \`.|\..----...-'` `-._.-'_.-'` # Remember that it is hard / ' ` , __.--' # to read the on-...

Good day. Spotted the CVE-2007-1870: the clamav 0.90.2 is already in the ports, but no sign of the issue in the VuXML. The entry is attached. One thing that is a bit strange is that the ChangeLog for the ClamAV (http://svn.clamav.net/svn/clamav-devel/trunk/ChangeLog) says about CVE-2007-1997 as the libclamav/cab.c log entry, but I think they are messed the numbers -- there is no such CVE, at least I failed to find...

Hi, FYI, Red Hat released an advisory today about a vulnerability in Ruby. So far it doesn't appear in the VuXML, but am I correct in presuming it will soon? https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2006-0604.html http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2006-3694 cheers, -- Joel Hatton -- Infrastructure Manager | Hotline: +61 7 3365 4417 AusCERT - Australia's national CERT | Fax: +6...

Hi all! I found this today on FD: http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2012/Aug/4

Hi, On 8/10/06, Mark Bucciarelli <mark@gaiahost.coop> wrote: > > > There's a scary security alert from yesterday out and no port > update so I judged it to be isp-related. I looked for > ports-security list but didn't see one. > > You know, that might be a very good ideea -- e.g. have a security team and list for ports as we have one for the base distribution.

...n, good day! Spotted two patches for x11-servers/xorg-server port: see entries for x11r6.9.0-dbe-render.diff and x11r6.9.0-cidfonts.diff at http://xorg.freedesktop.org/releases/X11R6.9.0/patches/index.html Seems like they are not applied to the xorg-server-6.9.0_5. May be it should be added to the VuXML document? There is a ports/107733 issue that incorporates these patches. May be you should have a look. Thanks! -- Eygene

Hi! Since linux-flashplugin7 r63 is vulnerable according to http://vuxml.FreeBSD.org/7c75d48c-429b-11db-afae-000c6ec775d9.html isn't www/linux-seamonkey vulerable, too (it seems to include 7 r25)? Bye Arne __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

>Submitter-Id: current-users >Originator: Eygene Ryabinkin >Organization: Code Labs >Confidential: no >Synopsis: [patch] [vuxml] net/wireshark: fix DoS in SMTP dissector >Severity: serious >Priority: high >Category: ports >Class: sw-bug >Release: FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE i386 >Environment: System: FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE i386 >Description: Today the DoS possibility for Wireshark was disclosed via BugTr...

Any reason why portaudit and its associated infrastructure was not announced to this list or security-notifications? I recently discovered it, and discovered the feature was added to bsd.port.mk in the beginning of feburary. Seeing as the security officer apparently (without announcement) no longer issues security notices (SNs) for ports, I am assuming that portaudit has replaced SNs entirely,

Hi! We are pleased to release Dovecot v2.3.6. Tarball is available at https://dovecot.org/releases/2.3/dovecot-2.3.6.tar.gz https://dovecot.org/releases/2.3/dovecot-2.3.6.tar.gz.sig Binary packages are available at https://repo.dovecot.org/ Changes ------- * CVE-2019-11494: Submission-login crashed with signal 11 due to null pointer access when authentication was aborted by disconnecting. *

Hi! We are pleased to release Dovecot v2.3.6. Tarball is available at https://dovecot.org/releases/2.3/dovecot-2.3.6.tar.gz https://dovecot.org/releases/2.3/dovecot-2.3.6.tar.gz.sig Binary packages are available at https://repo.dovecot.org/ Changes ------- * CVE-2019-11494: Submission-login crashed with signal 11 due to null pointer access when authentication was aborted by disconnecting. *

Greetings, I'm a little curious about the way FORBIDDEN knob is used in ports system. Traditionally, we use it to mark a port which have known security issue, with the new vuxml mechanism, are we still doing the same thing when necessary? Or, only the "critical" ones, for example, remote exploitable buffer overruns, etc? If the second assumption (only critical ones are marked FORBIDDEN) is true, then what's our criteria of what should be marked FORBIDDEN or...

I think, there is a neat exploit in the phpbb2.0.8 because I found my home page defaced one dark morning. The patch for phpBB is here. http://www.phpbb.com/downloads.php The excerpt of the log is attached. I believe the link to the described exploit is here. http://secunia.com/advisories/13239 The defacement braggen page is here filter to show the exploited FreeBSD machines that aneurysm.inc