Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "vulnerablity".
Did you mean:
vulnerability
2011 Feb 18
5
BInd Problem or Update SSL ?
> From: Larry Vaden <vaden at texoma.net>
> Date: Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 8:03 PM
> Subject: sources of bind-9.7.2-P3 rpms for Centos 4.8 and 5.5?
> Our site running Centos 4.8 and 5.5 name servers was hacked with
> the result that www.yahoo.com is now within our /19 and causing
> some grief.
Don't understand what you mean by 'within our /19'. Have your IP
1998 Feb 04
0
An old ld-linux.so hole
...d-linux.so buf is automatic.
Oops...
2) as you surely know, ld-linux.so 1.9.2 is broken completely, as it deals with
LD_PRELOAD variable even when linking a suid binary. An exploit based on this
"feature" was composed by Dan McGuirk, I guess. In this article, we''re not
using this vulnerablity.
3) Julian Assange (proff@SUBURBIA.NET) mentioned on bugtraq that he was able
to attack the linker with resource starvation ( for file descriptors ). I
assume it was possible on a system with artificially lowered file descriptors
limit; you can look at his a bit vague report at the URL mentioned at...