Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "vulnerabl".
Did you mean:
vulnerable
2011 Feb 18
5
BInd Problem or Update SSL ?
...t Mandriva upgraded last year.
I believe C6 will include an updated Bind.
> An attempt to install bind-9.7.2-P3 from source yields the warning
> below the sig for both 4.8 and 5.5 machines.
> WARNING WARNING WARNING WARNING WARNING ..........
>
> Your OpenSSL crypto library may be vulnerable to .....
> one or more of the the following known security ....
> flaws:
>
> CAN-2002-0659, CAN-2006-4339, CVE-2006-2937 and
> CVE-2006-2940.
>
> It is recommended that you upgrade to OpenSSL
> version 0.9.8d/0.9.7l (or greater).
Well, on my C 5.5 desktop my OpenSSL is (y...
1998 Feb 04
0
An old ld-linux.so hole
...d-linux.so buf is automatic.
Oops...
2) as you surely know, ld-linux.so 1.9.2 is broken completely, as it deals with
LD_PRELOAD variable even when linking a suid binary. An exploit based on this
"feature" was composed by Dan McGuirk, I guess. In this article, we''re not
using this vulnerablity.
3) Julian Assange (proff@SUBURBIA.NET) mentioned on bugtraq that he was able
to attack the linker with resource starvation ( for file descriptors ). I
assume it was possible on a system with artificially lowered file descriptors
limit; you can look at his a bit vague report at the URL mentioned...