search for: vulnerabilities

...e. I haven't been told what these are. -- REW] ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Wed, 10 Nov 1999 22:58:14 -0500 From: CERT Advisory <cert-advisory@cert.org> X-Reply-To: cert-advisory-request@cert.org To: cert-advisory@coal.cert.org Subject: CERT Advisory CA-99.14 - Multiple Vulnerabilities in BIND -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 CERT Advisory CA-99-14 Multiple Vulnerabilities in BIND Original release date: November 10, 1999 Last revised: -- Source: CERT/CC A complete revision history is at the end of this file. Systems Affected * Systems run...

I''m looking for some evidence, backup up with dates and references, that shows that the Linux community responds to security problems more quickly than other OS vendors, and thus might be considered "more secure". A number of fairly high profile corporations are starting to look for such information as they consider Linux as an alternative solution to other UNIXes. Something

[mod: Executive summary: SNI found recent linux-distributions not-vulnerable -- REW] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- ###### ## ## ###### ## ### ## ## ###### ## # ## ## ## ## ### ## ###### . ## ## . ######.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Xen Security Advisory CVE-2012-3515 / XSA-17 version 2 Qemu VT100 emulation vulnerability UPDATES IN VERSION 2 ==================== Public release. ISSUE DESCRIPTION ================= The device model used by fully virtualised (HVM) domains, qemu, does not properly handle escape VT100

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Xen Security Advisory CVE-2012-3515 / XSA-17 version 2 Qemu VT100 emulation vulnerability UPDATES IN VERSION 2 ==================== Public release. ISSUE DESCRIPTION ================= The device model used by fully virtualised (HVM) domains, qemu, does not properly handle escape VT100

The following is pasted from SecurityFocus Newsletter #254: ------------------------- Asterisk PBX Multiple Logging Format String Vulnerabilities BugTraq ID: 10569 Remote: Yes Date Published: Jun 18 2004 Relevant URL: http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/10569 Summary: It is reported that Asterisk is susceptible to format string vulnerabilities in its logging functions. An attacker may use these vulnerabilities to corrupt memory, and read or wr...

Do we know if dovecot is vulnerable to the heartbleed SSL problem? I'm running dovecot-2.0.9 and openssl-1.01, the latter being intrinsically vulnerable. An on-line tool says that my machine is not affected on port 993 but it would be nice to know for sure if we were vulnerable for a while. (Naturally I've blocked it anyway!). Thanks John

Hi! cc'd to freebsd-security@ as somebody there may correct me, cc'd to secteam@ as maintaner of security/portaudit. On Sun, 28 Aug 2005 10:14:21 +0930 Ian Moore wrote: > I've just updated my acroread port to 7.0.1 & was surprised when portaudit > still listed it as a vulnerability. I think it is portaudit problem. > According to

We have discovered a security vulnerability (“AltNames Vulnerability”) whereby a malicious attacker can impersonate the Puppet master using credentials from a Puppet agent node. This vulnerability cannot cross Puppet deployments, but it can allow an attacker with elevated privileges on one Puppet-managed node to gain control of any other Puppet-managed node within the same infrastructure. All

For even more information about "Heartbleed". -Connie Sieh ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 12:27:54 -0500 From: The SANS Institute <NewsBites at sans.org> Subject: FLASH NewsBites - Heartbleed Open SSL Vulnerability FLASH NewsBites - Heartbleed Open SSL Vulnerability FLASH NewsBites are issued only when a security event demands global and immediate

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- $Id: lpr-vulnerability-0.6-linux,v 1.2 1996/11/25 22:39:20 alex Exp $ Linux Security FAQ Update lpr Vulnerability Mon Nov 25 16:56:59 EST 1996 Copyright (C) 1995,1996 Alexander O. Yuriev (alex@bach.cis.temple.edu) CIS Laboratories

Hi, FYI, Red Hat released an advisory today about a vulnerability in Ruby. So far it doesn't appear in the VuXML, but am I correct in presuming it will soon? https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2006-0604.html http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2006-3694 cheers, -- Joel Hatton -- Infrastructure Manager | Hotline: +61 7 3365 4417 AusCERT - Australia's national

...t;eero.volotinen at iki.fi> wrote: > Centos 5 is not affected by this bug, so fix is not available. > > Eero > 31.3.2015 9.48 ap. kirjoitti "Venkateswara Rao Dokku" <dvrao.584 at gmail.com > >: > > > Hi All, > > > > I wanted to fix the openssl vulnerabilities (CVE-2014-3569, > CVE-2014-3570, > > CVE-2014-3571, CVE-2014-3572) in my CentOS 5.5 and found out that 0.9.8zd > > has the fixes I am looking for (from the > > https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html link). > > > > But, When I tried to find the openssl-0.9...

...to conceal their true location. I. Description By carefully constructing a sequence of packets with certain characteristics, an intruder can cause vulnerable systems to crash, hang, or behave in unpredictable ways. This vulnerability is similar in its effect to other denial-of-service vulnerabilities, including the ones described in http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-97.28.Teardrop_Land.html Specifically, intruders can use this vulnerability in conjunction with IP-source-address spoofing to make it difficult or impossible to know their location. They can also use the vulnerabi...

According to the vulnerability test script from shellshocker.net, the latest bash versions on CentOS5 and CentOS6, 3.2-33.el5_11.4 and 4.1.2-15.el6_5.2, resp., are still vulnerable to CVE-2014-6277. In fact, on CentOS6, abrtd will send you a nice report about it. Does anyone know if upstream is working on a fix? [root at host ~]# bash ~/shellshock_test.sh CVE-2014-6271 (original shellshock):

CORE SDI http://www.core-sdi.com SSH1 CRC-32 compensation attack detector vulnerability Date Published: 2001-02-08 Advisory ID: CORE-20010207 Bugtraq ID: 2347 CVE CAN: CAN-2001-0144 Title: SSH1 CRC-32 compensation attack detector vulnerability Class: Boundary Error Condition Remotely Exploitable: Yes Locally Exploitable: Yes Release Mode:

Dear subscribers, we are sending notifications for three vulnerabilities, - CVE-2020-10957 - CVE-2020-10958 - CVE-2020-10967 Please find them below --- Aki Tuomi Open-Xchange Oy ------------------ Open-Xchange Security Advisory 2020-05-18 Product: Dovecot Vendor: OX Software GmbH Internal reference: DOV-3784 Vulnerability type: NULL pointer dereference (CWE-47...

Dear subscribers, we are sending notifications for three vulnerabilities, - CVE-2020-10957 - CVE-2020-10958 - CVE-2020-10967 Please find them below --- Aki Tuomi Open-Xchange Oy ------------------ Open-Xchange Security Advisory 2020-05-18 Product: Dovecot Vendor: OX Software GmbH Internal reference: DOV-3784 Vulnerability type: NULL pointer dereference (CWE-47...

Hi All, Actually I am working with the OpenSSH version 6.2p which is vulnerable to above mentioned vulnerabilities. So am looking for some help how I can fix these vulnerabilities in my version. I need to fix it in the OpenSSH code. Regards Abhishek

Hello! Port security/portaudit reports the following problem: Affected package: FreeBSD-491000 Type of problem: multiple vulnerabilities in the cvs server code. Reference: <http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/portaudit/d2102505-f03d-11d8-81b0-000347a4fa7d.htm l> Note: To disable this check add the uuid to `portaudit_fixed' in /usr/local/etc/portaudit.conf I have 2 related questions: 1) What are current plans to fix these vulner...