search for: vulerable

Displaying 15 results from an estimated 15 matches for "vulerable".

Did you mean: vulnerable
2017 Aug 31
0
AST-2017-007: Remote Crash Vulerability in res_pjsip
Asterisk Project Security Advisory - AST-2017-007 Product Asterisk Summary Remote Crash Vulerability in res_pjsip Nature of Advisory Denial of Service Susceptibility Remote Unauthenticated Sessions Severity Moderate
2007 Apr 05
1
Extent of time zone vulerability for POSIX date and time classes
Hi. I frequently convert date and time data to and from character representations. I'm frustrated with chron, because 'seconds' are required to create a time object (my input data never has seconds). More importantly, I cannot make chron print the format 12/30/2006 (which my output data requires). I really like the format flexibility of strftime() and strptime(), but of course
2016 Oct 17
3
Is bind-9.8.2-0.47.rc1.el6_8.1.x86_64 vulnerable
Hi I'd like to know if the present version of Bind in CentOS 6 (bind-9.8.2-0.47.rc1.el6_8.1.x86_64) is vulerable to CVE-2016-2776. According to https://www.isc.org/downloads/, version 9.8.x is End-of-Life (EOL) as of Sep 2014. Regards ian
2006 Sep 13
2
ports / www/linux-seamonkey / flashplugin vulnerability
Hi! Since linux-flashplugin7 r63 is vulnerable according to http://vuxml.FreeBSD.org/7c75d48c-429b-11db-afae-000c6ec775d9.html isn't www/linux-seamonkey vulerable, too (it seems to include 7 r25)? Bye Arne __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
2004 Sep 20
1
RE: Samba 'make install' chokes on textproc/expat2 & now openldap
At 14:24 9/19/2004, JohnsoBS@vicksburg.navy.mil, wrote: >Personally, unless one has great need not to, I highly recommend upgrading >to samba3 to start with. The perfomance gains alone I found well worth it. >Plus if you plan to integrate into a network with 2k/XP/2K3, it will greatly >improve compatibility. OK. I tried to install samba 3.0.7,1. Got the same error:
2013 Aug 14
3
force ciphers order for clients
Hi Timo, reading this http://www.kuketz-blog.de/perfect-forward-secrecy-mit-apple-mail/ it looks like DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA can be forced in use with apple mail ( if no ECDHE is possible ,by missing openssl 1.x etc, seems that apple mail tries ECDHE first if fails its going to use RSA-AES128-SHA ) force soltution as tried ssl_cipher_list =
2008 Jun 22
6
Installing Rails
Having a god-awful time installing Rails. I started with the instructions found on this page: http://articles.slicehost.com/2007/11/23/ubuntu-gutsy-mysql-and-ror I get the following error: vbfischer@ubuntu:~$ sudo gem install rails [sudo] password for vbfischer: Bulk updating Gem source index for: http://gems.rubyforge.org/ Updating metadata for 13 gems from http://gems.rubyonrails.org/
2019 Dec 18
0
"ldap server require strong auth" and MS-AD
Hi everyone, Microsoft is going to tighten their AD LDAP binding security in mid-January 2020 [1][2]. I am wondering if this change is identical or similar to the "ldap server require strong auth=yes" parameter in smb.conf. Or if it more like "ldap server require strong auth=allow_sasl_over_tls". From [1] : """ Summary LDAP channel binding and LDAP
2005 Jan 28
1
fbsd not vulnerable to recent bind issues?
Hi, Recently some security issues with bind have come up. NetBSD patched it's version of 9.3.0: http://mail-index.netbsd.org/source-changes/2005/01/27/0009.html Is the version in RELENG_5 not affected? (ftp://ftp.isc.org/isc/bind/9.3.0/9.3.0-patch1) Bye, Mipam.
2015 Nov 25
2
Glibc vulnerbality CVE-2015-1781
Hi, We are using CentOS 5.5 as a base OS for one of our products.The version of Glibc we are using was glibc-2.5-123.el5_11.1. We wanted to see whether this glibc is vulerable to CVE-2015-1781. I have gone through re-documentation & came across the following link https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2015-1781 In the link it is mentioned that, the CVE will not be fixed in Red-Hat 5 version. What does that mean? I mean, whether the RedHat 5 is vulnerable & f...
2003 May 22
2
issue with ports
my ports database seems to have become broken. I'm running -stable, but haven't rebuilt the system in a year or so (I know, security vulerabilities, but the box has been shelved in this time). anyhow, at this point, I can't do even a make clean in ports, or build portupgrade. I fetched portupgrade with pkg_add hoping that running pkgdb -F would sort things out, but it errors with: **
2002 Jul 30
1
OpenSSL Security Advisory [30 July 2002]
Hi, FYI - don't sue me for posting this here - I know, everyone who needs this info *should* have it already, but maybe not ;-) Kind regards, B. Courtin -- OpenSSL Security Advisory [30 July 2002] This advisory consists of two independent advisories, merged, and is an official OpenSSL advisory. Advisory 1 ========== A.L. Digital Ltd and The Bunker (http://www.thebunker.net/) are
2019 Sep 01
6
TLS questions
I am currently NOT using SSL on my Samba domain. While reading "Configuring_LDAP_over_SSL_(LDAPS)_on_a_Samba_AD_DC" and thinking about implementing. I'm having trouble "getting my head" around what certificates go where. Simply put, I am not clear as to generating certificates on the clients and then copy which files to to the server or vice versa? What happens when
2020 Nov 06
2
[DebugInfo] A value-tracking variable location update
...preserved an undef debug instruction in early-taildup, and my scripts picked this up as dropping a location. * 2 locations aren't tracked by InstrRefBasedLDV through a block that's out of scope, meaning the location never covers instructions that are in scope. VarLocBasedLDV is vulerable to this too, but MachineSink can drop a DBG_VALUE on the far side of the scope gap, saving the location. See "Limitations" below. * 2 locations dropped during tail duplication: one in early-taildup which I haven't tried to address yet (see "Limitations"), one in la...
2020 Nov 06
0
[DebugInfo] A value-tracking variable location update
...f debug instruction in early-taildup, and my scripts picked > this up as dropping a location. > * 2 locations aren't tracked by InstrRefBasedLDV through a block that's > out of scope, meaning the location never covers instructions that are in > scope. VarLocBasedLDV is vulerable to this too, but MachineSink can drop a > DBG_VALUE on the far side of the scope gap, saving the location. See > "Limitations" below. > * 2 locations dropped during tail duplication: one in early-taildup which > I haven't tried to address yet (see "Limitatio...