search for: vtable2

Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "vtable2".

Did you mean: vtable
2015 Jul 31
4
[LLVMdev] Clang devirtualization proposal
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Philip Reames <listmail at philipreames.com> wrote: > > Quoting from the google doc: "If we don’t know definition of some > function, we assume that it will not call @llvm.invariant.group.barrier(). > " > This part really really bugs me. We generally try to assume minimal > knowledge of external functions (i.e. they can do
2015 Aug 01
0
[LLVMdev] Clang devirtualization proposal
...t. We should end up a with two loads of the vtable using the same SSA value and the same invariant.group metadata. The later can be forwarded from the former without issue right? %a = ...; %vtable1 = load %a + Y !invariant.group !0 %foo1 = load %vtable1 + X, !invariant.group !1 call %foo1(%a) %vtable2 = load %a + Y !invariant.group !0 <-- Per state rules, this value forwards from previous vtable load %foo2 = load %vtable2 + X, !invariant.group !1 call %foo2(%a) Philip -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-d...