search for: vt1000

Maybe somebody can help me. I'm testing my brand new [*], interconnecting it with several networks, but only via softphones up to now. I do have a VT1000 CPE from vonage, with a vonage line on the first FXS port, and would like to use the second FXS port to connect it to my [*] This is my question: My vonage VT1000 is connected between the cablemodem and a home gateway. Therefore, I understand, it has no ip on it's own, it uses the ip that the...

...r=phone > To: <sip:1905XXXXXXX@bspgroup1.bsp.vonage.net:5061>;user=phone > Call-ID: ac150566-13c5-40e8ddde-51e6-2327-0 > CSeq: 1 REGISTER > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.21.5.102:5061;branch=z9hG4bK-40eca012-eaee0a8-474d > User-Agent: <Motorola VT1000 mac: 000F9F8XXXXX sw:VT20_1.1.16e ln:0 cfg:10886711XXXXX/10022XXXXX> > Max-Forwards: 70 > Contact: <sip:1905XXXXXXX@172.21.5.102:5061>;user=phone;transport=udp > Expires: 900 > Content-Length:0 > > No. Time Source...

...ning: *CLI> show version Asterisk CVS-12/17/03-15:26:25 built by root@voip on a i686 running Linux *CLI> If I re-enable my FAX extension, of course, instead of the NOTICE the calls just get sent to my FAX machine. This occurs on both a standard issue verizon POTS line, as well as a motorola vt1000 telephone adapter provided by vonage. Does anyone have any idea as to why this may be happening? I haven't changed anything in my config, just upgraded asterisk and zaptel. Thanks. Pat

I got a call from an ISP friend tonight who said he is getting calls from people who are getting signed up with Vonage. Instead of sending them ATA186s, apparently they're receiving something made by Motorola. They apparently work significantly differently than the Cisco units, and there have been some problems. Anybody know anything further? Thx. B.