search for: vsyscalls

This adds support for CONFIG_COMPAT_VDSO. As this will certainly raise questions, I left in the code needed for an alternative approach (which requires mode C code, but less build script changes). Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com> Index: head-2007-02-27/arch/i386/Kconfig =================================================================== ---

This adds support for CONFIG_COMPAT_VDSO. As this will certainly raise questions, I left in the code needed for an alternative approach (which requires mode C code, but less build script changes). Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com> Index: head-2007-02-27/arch/i386/Kconfig =================================================================== ---

This adds support for CONFIG_COMPAT_VDSO. As this will certainly raise questions, I left in the code needed for an alternative approach (which requires mode C code, but less build script changes). Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com> Index: head-2007-02-27/arch/i386/Kconfig =================================================================== ---

AFAICT we'll pay one extra TLB entry for this patch. Zach had a patch which left the vsyscall page at the top of memory (minus hole for hypervisor) and patched the ELF header at boot. Thoughts welcome, Rusty. Name: Move vsyscall page out of fixmap, above stack Author: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@suse.de> Hypervisors want to use memory at the top of the address space (eg. 64MB for Xen, or

AFAICT we'll pay one extra TLB entry for this patch. Zach had a patch which left the vsyscall page at the top of memory (minus hole for hypervisor) and patched the ELF header at boot. Thoughts welcome, Rusty. Name: Move vsyscall page out of fixmap, above stack Author: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@suse.de> Hypervisors want to use memory at the top of the address space (eg. 64MB for Xen, or

Debian kernels have disabled legacy vsyscall page support meaning they cannot runs binaries that predate c.2013. To enable it again you must add vsyscall=emulate to the kernel command line when booting. It's unclear why Debian disabled this as according to the documentation: Disabling this option saves about 7K of kernel size and possibly 4K of additional runtime pagetable memory.

Thanks: Haigang Li --- v2v/virt-v2v.pod | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+) diff --git a/v2v/virt-v2v.pod b/v2v/virt-v2v.pod index 251b4919f..09f505f91 100644 --- a/v2v/virt-v2v.pod +++ b/v2v/virt-v2v.pod @@ -977,6 +977,25 @@ A recommended procedure is, before using virt-v2v, to check that the boot kernel is the best kernel available in the guest (for example by making

plain text document attachment (xx-paravirt-vsyscall.patch) vsyscall interface updates for paravirt ops. Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt srostedt@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@redhat.com> Index: clean-start/arch/x86_64/kernel/vsyscall.c =================================================================== --- clean-start.orig/arch/x86_64/kernel/vsyscall.c +++

plain text document attachment (xx-paravirt-vsyscall.patch) vsyscall interface updates for paravirt ops. Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt srostedt@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@redhat.com> Index: clean-start/arch/x86_64/kernel/vsyscall.c =================================================================== --- clean-start.orig/arch/x86_64/kernel/vsyscall.c +++

This fixes various problems that cropped up with the vdso patches. - Patch 1 fixes an information leak to userspace. - Patches 2 and 3 fix the kernel build on gold. - Patches 4 and 5 fix Xen (I hope). - Patch 6 (optional) adds a trace event to vsyscall emulation. It will make it easier to handle performance regression reports :) [1]

This fixes various problems that cropped up with the vdso patches. - Patch 1 fixes an information leak to userspace. - Patches 2 and 3 fix the kernel build on gold. - Patches 4 and 5 fix Xen (I hope). - Patch 6 (optional) adds a trace event to vsyscall emulation. It will make it easier to handle performance regression reports :) [1]

This fixes various problems that cropped up with the vdso patches. - Patch 1 fixes an information leak to userspace. - Patches 2 and 3 fix the kernel build on gold. - Patches 4 and 5 fix Xen (I hope). - Patch 6 (optional) adds a trace event to vsyscall emulation. It will make it easier to handle performance regression reports :) [1]

So, is everyone happy with this smerge of Ingo and Gerd's work? Reposted below. Thanks, Rusty. -------- Forwarded Message -------- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Subject: Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: FW: argh]] Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 21:35:51 -0700 (PDT) On Thu, 18 May 2006, Rusty Russell wrote: >

So, is everyone happy with this smerge of Ingo and Gerd's work? Reposted below. Thanks, Rusty. -------- Forwarded Message -------- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Subject: Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: FW: argh]] Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 21:35:51 -0700 (PDT) On Thu, 18 May 2006, Rusty Russell wrote: >

This fixes various problems that cropped up with the vdso patches. - Patch 1 fixes an information leak to userspace. - Patches 2 and 3 fix the kernel build on gold. - Patches 4 and 5 fix Xen (I hope). Konrad, could you could test these on Xen and run 'test_vsyscall test' [1]? I don't have a usable Xen setup. Also, I'd appreciate a review of patches 4 and 5 from some

This fixes various problems that cropped up with the vdso patches. - Patch 1 fixes an information leak to userspace. - Patches 2 and 3 fix the kernel build on gold. - Patches 4 and 5 fix Xen (I hope). Konrad, could you could test these on Xen and run 'test_vsyscall test' [1]? I don't have a usable Xen setup. Also, I'd appreciate a review of patches 4 and 5 from some

This fixes various problems that cropped up with the vdso patches. - Patch 1 fixes an information leak to userspace. - Patches 2 and 3 fix the kernel build on gold. - Patches 4 and 5 fix Xen (I hope). Konrad, could you could test these on Xen and run 'test_vsyscall test' [1]? I don't have a usable Xen setup. Also, I'd appreciate a review of patches 4 and 5 from some

Hi, If the pristine centos:centos5 centos:centos6 images are not running on your brand new host running another linux distribution, you might be hitting this issue: https://github.com/CentOS/sig-cloud-instance-images/issues/62 https://bugs.alpinelinux.org/issues/6928 Cheers Tru -- Tru Huynh http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B -------------- next part

...oes not help there. This patch introduces a > new flag to automatically clear memory contents on VM suspend/resume, > which will allow random number generators to reseed when virtual > machines get cloned. Umm. If this is real problem, should kernel provide such rng in the vsdo page using vsyscalls? Kernel can have special interface to its vsyscalls, but we may not want to offer this functionality to rest of userland... > - Provides a simple mechanism to avoid RAM exfiltration during > traditional sleep/hibernate on a laptop or desktop when memory, > and thus secrets, are vul...

...oes not help there. This patch introduces a > new flag to automatically clear memory contents on VM suspend/resume, > which will allow random number generators to reseed when virtual > machines get cloned. Umm. If this is real problem, should kernel provide such rng in the vsdo page using vsyscalls? Kernel can have special interface to its vsyscalls, but we may not want to offer this functionality to rest of userland... > - Provides a simple mechanism to avoid RAM exfiltration during > traditional sleep/hibernate on a laptop or desktop when memory, > and thus secrets, are vul...