Displaying 10 results from an estimated 10 matches for "vsock_dgram_connect".
2019 Sep 27
0
[RFC PATCH 04/13] vsock: add 'transport' member in the struct vsock_sock
...rt;
if (msg->msg_flags & MSG_OOB)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
@@ -944,6 +949,7 @@ static int vsock_dgram_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
err = 0;
sk = sock->sk;
vsk = vsock_sk(sk);
+ transport = vsk->transport;
lock_sock(sk);
@@ -1028,8 +1034,8 @@ static int vsock_dgram_connect(struct socket *sock,
if (err)
goto out;
- if (!transport->dgram_allow(remote_addr->svm_cid,
- remote_addr->svm_port)) {
+ if (!vsk->transport->dgram_allow(remote_addr->svm_cid,
+ remote_addr->svm_port)) {
err = -EINVAL;
goto out;
}
@@ -1045,7 +1051,9...
2019 Oct 23
0
[PATCH net-next 04/14] vsock: add 'transport' member in the struct vsock_sock
...rt;
if (msg->msg_flags & MSG_OOB)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
@@ -952,6 +957,7 @@ static int vsock_dgram_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
err = 0;
sk = sock->sk;
vsk = vsock_sk(sk);
+ transport = vsk->transport;
lock_sock(sk);
@@ -1036,8 +1042,8 @@ static int vsock_dgram_connect(struct socket *sock,
if (err)
goto out;
- if (!transport->dgram_allow(remote_addr->svm_cid,
- remote_addr->svm_port)) {
+ if (!vsk->transport->dgram_allow(remote_addr->svm_cid,
+ remote_addr->svm_port)) {
err = -EINVAL;
goto out;
}
@@ -1053,7 +1059,9...
2023 Mar 02
0
[PATCH net-next v3 1/3] vsock: support sockmap
On Sat, Feb 18, 2023 at 07:25:41AM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote:
>On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 04:36:22PM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 07:04:34PM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote:
>> > @@ -1241,19 +1252,34 @@ static int vsock_dgram_connect(struct socket *sock,
>> >
>> > memcpy(&vsk->remote_addr, remote_addr, sizeof(vsk->remote_addr));
>> > sock->state = SS_CONNECTED;
>> > + sk->sk_state = TCP_ESTABLISHED;
>> >
>> > out:
>> > release_sock(sk);
>&g...
2019 Oct 23
33
[PATCH net-next 00/14] vsock: add multi-transports support
This series adds the multi-transports support to vsock, following
this proposal: https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg575792.html
With the multi-transports support, we can use VSOCK with nested VMs
(using also different hypervisors) loading both guest->host and
host->guest transports at the same time.
Before this series, vmci-transport supported this behavior but only
using VMware
2019 Oct 23
33
[PATCH net-next 00/14] vsock: add multi-transports support
This series adds the multi-transports support to vsock, following
this proposal: https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg575792.html
With the multi-transports support, we can use VSOCK with nested VMs
(using also different hypervisors) loading both guest->host and
host->guest transports at the same time.
Before this series, vmci-transport supported this behavior but only
using VMware
2019 Nov 14
15
[PATCH net-next v2 00/15] vsock: add multi-transports support
Most of the patches are reviewed by Dexuan, Stefan, and Jorgen.
The following patches need reviews:
- [11/15] vsock: add multi-transports support
- [12/15] vsock/vmci: register vmci_transport only when VMCI guest/host
are active
- [15/15] vhost/vsock: refuse CID assigned to the guest->host transport
RFC: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/cover/1168442/
v1:
2019 Sep 27
29
[RFC PATCH 00/13] vsock: add multi-transports support
Hi all,
this series adds the multi-transports support to vsock, following
this proposal:
https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg575792.html
With the multi-transports support, we can use vsock with nested VMs
(using also different hypervisors) loading both guest->host and
host->guest transports at the same time.
Before this series, vmci-transport supported this behavior but only
using
2019 Sep 27
29
[RFC PATCH 00/13] vsock: add multi-transports support
Hi all,
this series adds the multi-transports support to vsock, following
this proposal:
https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg575792.html
With the multi-transports support, we can use vsock with nested VMs
(using also different hypervisors) loading both guest->host and
host->guest transports at the same time.
Before this series, vmci-transport supported this behavior but only
using
2013 Jan 25
4
[PATCH 0/1] VM Sockets for Linux upstreaming
From: Andy King <acking at vmware.com>
** Introduce VM Sockets ***
In an effort to improve the out-of-the-box experience with Linux kernels for
VMware users, VMware is working on readying the VM Sockets (VSOCK, formerly
VMCI Sockets) (vmw_vsock) kernel module for inclusion in the Linux kernel. The
purpose of this post is to acquire feedback on the vmw_vsock kernel module.
Unlike previous
2013 Jan 25
4
[PATCH 0/1] VM Sockets for Linux upstreaming
From: Andy King <acking at vmware.com>
** Introduce VM Sockets ***
In an effort to improve the out-of-the-box experience with Linux kernels for
VMware users, VMware is working on readying the VM Sockets (VSOCK, formerly
VMCI Sockets) (vmw_vsock) kernel module for inclusion in the Linux kernel. The
purpose of this post is to acquire feedback on the vmw_vsock kernel module.
Unlike previous