search for: vsock_deassign_transport

...vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c index dddd85d9a147..1f2e707cae66 100644 --- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c @@ -380,6 +380,16 @@ void vsock_enqueue_accept(struct sock *listener, struct sock *connected) } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vsock_enqueue_accept); +static void vsock_deassign_transport(struct vsock_sock *vsk) +{ + if (!vsk->transport) + return; + + vsk->transport->destruct(vsk); + module_put(vsk->transport->module); + vsk->transport = NULL; +} + /* Assign a transport to a socket and call the .init transport callback. * * Note: for stream socket this must b...

...ing + * while there are open sockets assigned to it. + */ + if (!vsk->transport || !try_module_get(vsk->transport->module)) { + vsk->transport = NULL; return -ENODEV; + } return vsk->transport->init(vsk, psk); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vsock_assign_transport); +static void vsock_deassign_transport(struct vsock_sock *vsk) +{ + if (!vsk->transport) + return; + + vsk->transport->destruct(vsk); + module_put(vsk->transport->module); + vsk->transport = NULL; +} + static bool vsock_find_cid(unsigned int cid) { if (transport_g2h && cid == transport_g2h->get_local_ci...

v2: - style fixes [Dave] - removed RCU sync and changed 'the_vsock_loopback' in a global static variable [Stefan] - use G2H transport when local transport is not loaded and remote cid is VMADDR_CID_LOCAL [Stefan] - rebased on net-next v1: https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/11251735/ This series introduces a new transport (vsock_loopback) to handle local communication. This

Most of the patches are reviewed by Dexuan, Stefan, and Jorgen. The following patches need reviews: - [11/15] vsock: add multi-transports support - [12/15] vsock/vmci: register vmci_transport only when VMCI guest/host are active - [15/15] vhost/vsock: refuse CID assigned to the guest->host transport RFC: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/cover/1168442/ v1:

Hi all, this series adds the multi-transports support to vsock, following this proposal: https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg575792.html With the multi-transports support, we can use vsock with nested VMs (using also different hypervisors) loading both guest->host and host->guest transports at the same time. Before this series, vmci-transport supported this behavior but only using

Hi all, this series adds the multi-transports support to vsock, following this proposal: https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg575792.html With the multi-transports support, we can use vsock with nested VMs (using also different hypervisors) loading both guest->host and host->guest transports at the same time. Before this series, vmci-transport supported this behavior but only using

This series adds the multi-transports support to vsock, following this proposal: https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg575792.html With the multi-transports support, we can use VSOCK with nested VMs (using also different hypervisors) loading both guest->host and host->guest transports at the same time. Before this series, vmci-transport supported this behavior but only using VMware

This series adds the multi-transports support to vsock, following this proposal: https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg575792.html With the multi-transports support, we can use VSOCK with nested VMs (using also different hypervisors) loading both guest->host and host->guest transports at the same time. Before this series, vmci-transport supported this behavior but only using VMware