search for: vscode

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 25 matches for "vscode".

2019 Aug 14
9
[9.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 2 is here
Hello everyone, 9.0.0-rc2 was tagged yesterday from the release_90 branch at r368683. In the Git monorepo it's available as the llvmorg-9.0.0-rc2 tag. Source code and docs are available at https://prereleases.llvm.org/9.0.0/#rc2 Binaries will be added as they become available. The tag went in roughly one week behind schedule (see "Upcoming Releases" at https://llvm.org), but
2019 Jul 29
10
[9.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 1 is here
Hi everyone, 9.0.0-rc1 was just tagged from the release_90 branch at r367217 (tagged as llvmorg-9.0.0-rc1 in the Git monorepo). Source code and docs are available at https://prereleases.llvm.org/9.0.0/#rc1 Binaries will be added as they become available. Please file bug reports for any issues you find as blockers of https://llvm.org/PR42474 Release testers: please start your engines, run the
2019 Sep 13
4
[9.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 5 is here
Hello everyone, 9.0.0-rc5 was just tagged from the release_90 branch at r371837. In the Git monorepo, it's tagged as llvmorg-9.0.0-rc5. Source code and docs are available at https://prereleases.llvm.org/9.0.0/#rc5 Binaries will be added as they become available. There is only a single change from rc4 to rc5. Once more, the hope is that this will be the last release candidate and that we can
2019 Oct 09
2
Cloning llvm-project fails
Hi, cloning/checkout llvm-project on Windows fails for me with: C:\Users\KaiNacke\vscode>git clone git://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git master Cloning into 'master'... remote: Enumerating objects: 2557, done. remote: Counting objects: 100% (2557/2557), done. remote: Compressing objects: 100% (102/102), done. Receiving objects: 100% (3562454/3562454), 1.27 GiB | 6.92 MiB/s...
2019 Dec 14
5
LLVM 9.0.1-rc3 has been tagged
Hi, I've just tagged LLVM 9.0.1-rc3. Testers can begin testing and uploading binaries. This will be the last release candidate unless there is a major problem. I'm planning to tag the final release on Dec 19. -Tom
2019 Sep 10
15
[9.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 4 is here
Hello again, 9.0.0-rc4 was just tagged from the release_90 branch at r371490. In the Git monorepo, it's tagged as llvmorg-9.0.0-rc4. Source code and docs are available at https://prereleases.llvm.org/9.0.0/#rc4 Binaries will be added as they become available. There are not a lot of changes from rc3 to rc4, and there are again no open release blockers, so I'm hoping this will be the last
2019 Nov 23
5
LLVM 9.0.1-rc1 Release has been tagged
Hi, I've tagged the LLVM 9.0.1-rc1 release. Testers can begin testing and upload binaries. I've also updated the test-release.sh script to pull from GitHub instead of SVN, if you run into any issues with the new script, let me know. -Tom
2019 Dec 20
7
LLVM 9.0.1-final has been tagged
Hi, I've just tagged the 9.0.1-final release. Testers can begin uploading binaries. -Tom
2019 Aug 30
9
[9.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 3 is here
Hello everyone, 9.0.0-rc3 was tagged today from the release_90 branch at r370450. In the Git monorepo, it's tagged as llvmorg-9.0.0-rc3. Source code and docs are available at https://prereleases.llvm.org/9.0.0/#rc3 Binaries will be added as they become available. There are currently no open release blockers, which means if nothing new comes up, the final release could ship soon and this is
2019 Dec 07
6
LLVM 9.0.1-rc2 has been tagged
Hi, I've tagged LLVM 9.0.1-rc2. Testers can begin testing and uploading binaries. If all goes well, this will be the last -rc. -Tom
2019 Sep 17
18
[9.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 6 is here
Hello everyone, 9.0.0-rc6 was just tagged from the release_90 branch at r372100. In the Git monorepo, it's tagged as llvmorg-9.0.0-rc6. Source code and docs are available at https://prereleases.llvm.org/9.0.0/#rc6 This is the same as rc5 plus one very minor change (r371969) that still seemed good to pick up. I'm not allocating extra time for testing this one, expecting to tag
2024 Oct 10
4
[Bug 3742] New: ssh_config default values with Host-specific values does not apply
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3742 Bug ID: 3742 Summary: ssh_config default values with Host-specific values does not apply Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component:
2024 Jun 28
1
Positron as a tool
Hi Avi, I am not sure that the R-help mailing list is a suitable channel for advertising R-related tools... But given you mentioned Positron (https://github.com/posit-dev/positron), which is based on VSCode, it is worth calling out that a free, open-source, community-maintained, very feature rich R extension (https://code.visualstudio.com/docs/languages/r) already exists in VS Code for years. Regards, Denes On 6/28/24 07:10, avi.e.gross at gmail.com wrote: > This is just an FYI based on a ne...
2019 Jul 20
7
8.0.1-final has been tagged
Hi, The 8.0.1 final release has been tagged. Testers please upload the final binaries. -Tom
2020 Apr 10
4
Running clang tests
Hi, I’d just like to interject to say that building within Visual Studio isn’t really that bad. Running the lit tests is a bit painful because the LLVM build tools that are integrated with the build system don’t play nice with msbuild. Particularly, I’ve never been able to actually cancel an invocation of lit or tablegen via visual studio. That said, there is a huge upside to building with
2024 Jun 28
1
Positron as a tool
...03 AM To: avi.e.gross at gmail.com; r-help at r-project.org Subject: Re: [R] Positron as a tool Hi Avi, I am not sure that the R-help mailing list is a suitable channel for advertising R-related tools... But given you mentioned Positron (https://github.com/posit-dev/positron), which is based on VSCode, it is worth calling out that a free, open-source, community-maintained, very feature rich R extension (https://code.visualstudio.com/docs/languages/r) already exists in VS Code for years. Regards, Denes On 6/28/24 07:10, avi.e.gross at gmail.com wrote: > This is just an FYI based on a ne...
2024 Oct 22
1
Why only the first of a series of calls to a function in my driver executing?
...tracing with debug printouts is good in very many cases; otherwise it can really help to stage a run in an IDE with a debugger. Cross-platform wise, I've had consistently good experience with NetBeans (installing the C/C++ plugin from the NB 8.2 archive after every NB upgrade is a PITA though); VSCode also worked (at least when I drilled into NUT for Windows builds with MSYS2) - hints on both are in NUT docs. Hope this helps, Jim Klimov On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 5:01?AM William R. Elliot <bill at wreassoc.com> wrote: > Hello all, > > In my new driver I have a function that sear...
2024 Jun 28
1
Positron as a tool
This is just an FYI based on a news item I saw tonight. There have been discussions on what editors or environments people can use when working with R and I personally have mostly been using versions of RSTUDIO and lately for both R and python. As often noted, RSTUDIO is a product of a company, currently still largely free and they have some tweaks that can cause issues. The news article
2024 Jun 29
0
R related tools - GUI
...ype: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed" > > Hi Avi, > > I am not sure that the R-help mailing list is a suitable channel for > advertising R-related tools... But given you mentioned Positron > (https://github.com/posit-dev/positron), which is based on VSCode, it is > worth calling out that a free, open-source, community-maintained, very > feature rich R extension > (https://code.visualstudio.com/docs/languages/r) already exists in VS > Code for years. > > Regards, > Denes > > > On 6/28/24 07:10, avi.e.gross at gmail.com wr...
2024 Oct 22
1
Why only the first of a series of calls to a function in my driver executing?
Hello all, In my new driver I have a function that searches for the position of a known substring in a delimited string. I am trying to populate a series of integer variables with the position value of various substrings. The first call to the function performs correctly but the remaining calls in the code series are not being executed (there are six more calls after the first successful