search for: vs15

...itself, and resulted in a larger executable size > among other things, IIRC). I know you mentioned that one of the reasons we upgraded to 2013 was because 2015 was in RC or RTM. Ironically, the day after I posted this MS announced Visual Studio 15 preview <https://www.visualstudio.com/news/vs15-preview-vs> (which is confusingly the version *after* Visual Studio 2015). In any case, it's not an RC, and it's certainly not an RTM, but it is on the horizon. So hopefully we can revisit this question when 15 is in RC / RTM -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment...

On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 1:29 PM, Zachary Turner via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > I think it's been a little over a year since we bumped the minimum VS > version to 2013. Are we planning to do the same for 2015? Update 2 is > releasing soon, which is stable enough at least to ship Chromium. In the past, we've supported the latest two major versions of

I think it's been a little over a year since we bumped the minimum VS version to 2013. Are we planning to do the same for 2015? Update 2 is releasing soon, which is stable enough at least to ship Chromium <https://randomascii.wordpress.com/2016/03/24/compiler-bugs-found-when-porting-chromium-to-vc-2015/> . Language wise, 2015 comes with a lot of new C++ features. The most interesting