search for: vroom

Hi Dave, That's rather frustrating. I've found vroom (from the package vroom) to be helpful with large files like this. Does the following give you any better luck? vroom(file_name, delim = ",", skip = 2459465, n_max = 5) Of course, when you know you've got errors & the files are big like that it can take a bit of work resolving...

...- but that read.csv can't handle. readLines followed by read.csv(text= ) works great because, in that case, read.csv knows where the record terminates. Meaning, read.csv throws an exception that I can catch and handle with a quick and clean regex expression. Thanks, I'll take a look at vroom. -dave On 4/8/24 09:18, Stevie Pederson wrote: > Hi Dave, > > That's rather frustrating. I've found vroom (from the package vroom) > to be helpful with large files like this. > > Does the following give you any better luck? > > vroom(file_name, delim = ",&quo...

...can merge 300 csvs with a total of 0.5m lines and 50 columns in a couple of minutes versus a lifetime with read.csv or readr::read_csv On Mon, 8 Apr 2024, 16:19 Stevie Pederson, <stephen.pederson.au at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Dave, > > That's rather frustrating. I've found vroom (from the package vroom) to be > helpful with large files like this. > > Does the following give you any better luck? > > vroom(file_name, delim = ",", skip = 2459465, n_max = 5) > > Of course, when you know you've got errors & the files are big like that it &...

Greetings, I have a csv file of 76 fields and about 4 million records. I know that some of the records have errors - unmatched quotes, specifically.? Reading the file with readLines and parsing the lines with read.csv(text = ...) is really slow. I know that the first 2459465 records are good. So I try this: > startTime <- Sys.time() > first_records <- read.csv(file_name, nrows

...OpenLDAP does not allow it) See my logs attached Why doesn't samba execute my add machine script at this point, instead of trying to create it on its own ? Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel Berteaud FIREWALL-SERVICES SAS. Société de Services en Logiciels Libres Tel : 05 56 64 15 32 Visio: https://vroom.fws.fr/dani Web : http://www.firewall-services.com -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: add_user.txt URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/attachments/20171115/47fcdd88/add_user.txt>

...n provided with the distro, but I'll check if there's some trustworthy PPA to get something a bit newer. The strange thing, is that the script is not even called at all. -- Daniel Berteaud FIREWALL-SERVICES SAS. Société de Services en Logiciels Libres Tel : 05 56 64 15 32 Visio: https://vroom.fws.fr/dani Web : http://www.firewall-services.com

...akes samba ignore "add machine script" and instead try to create the entry directly ? Anyway, it's working now, even if I don't understand why Regards, Daniel -- Daniel Berteaud FIREWALL-SERVICES SAS. Société de Services en Logiciels Libres Tel : 05 56 64 15 32 Visio: https://vroom.fws.fr/dani Web : http://www.firewall-services.com

...nues to exist and contains an empty remote::volume/directory/directory :P ) # rsync -mr --delete 'directory' remote::volume (says "no files to transfer", and nothing happens. @#$%) # touch directory/dummy_file # rsync -mr --delete 'directory' remote::volume/directory ( vroom! now the contents of remote::volume/directory are being cleaned out. unfortunately remote::volume/directory/dummy_file will remain for all eternity.. ) What would be the closest approximation to something like this? # rsync -r --just-nuke-the-target remote::volume/directory Is it something that...

On Thu, 16 Nov 2017 08:20:03 +0100 Daniel Berteaud via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Now, the "funny" thing is that, it did work, something like 3 times > in over 50 tries. It's not just the config because, once it worked, I > removed the same workstation from the domain, removed the LDAP entry, > made no configuration change, not service restart and

On 11/16/2017 12:54 PM, Daniel Berteaud wrote: > Le 15/11/2017 ? 09:45, Ravishankar N a ?crit?: >> If it is only the brick that is faulty on the bad node, but >> everything else is fine, like glusterd running, the node being a part >> of the trusted storage pool etc,? you could just kill the brick first >> and do step-13 in "10.6.2. Replacing a Host Machine with

...5,15 +425,23 @@ > > their domain. :)</td></tr> > > <tr><td>Duncan Sands</td><th>OptLib</th><td>Portmanteau of optimizing and library.</td></tr> > > <tr><td>Duncan Sands</td><th>llvroom</th><td>As in the vrooming of a motorcycle engine. > > + <tr><td>Duncan Sands</td><th>OptLOC</th><td>Portmanteau of Optimization and > > + Lines Of Code</td></tr> > > <tr><td>Duncan Sands</td...

Le 15/11/2017 ? 09:45, Ravishankar N a ?crit?: > If it is only the brick that is faulty on the bad node, but everything > else is fine, like glusterd running, the node being a part of the > trusted storage pool etc,? you could just kill the brick first and do > step-13 in "10.6.2. Replacing a Host Machine with the Same Hostname", > (the mkdir of non-existent dir,

...d and recreated while the bad one was offline. So they haven't the same gfid now. How does gluster handle this ? Sorry for all those questions, I'm just a bit nervous :-) -- Daniel Berteaud FIREWALL-SERVICES SAS. Soci?t? de Services en Logiciels Libres Tel : 05 56 64 15 32 Visio: https://vroom.fws.fr/dani Web : http://www.firewall-services.com