search for: vr3

...t;Mechanism B","Mechanism B","Mechanism B","Mechanism B","Mechanism B","Mechanism B","Mechanism B",) vn <- data.frame(MECH.NAME, PROV.PM.FBCTS, FBCTS.INV.TOT, FBCTS.REC.TOT) # create function allocation <- function(vr1, vr2, vr3) { d <- ddply(vn, "MECH.NAME", summarise, SUM = vr1 + vr2 + vr3) vn <- merge(vn, d, by.x="MECH.NAME", by.y="MECH.NAME", all=T) new <- (vr1+vr2+vr3) / vn$SUM return(new) } # run function vn$PROV.PM.FBCTS <- allocation(PROV.PM.FBCTS, FBCTS.INV.TOT, FBCTS...

...e example shorted I replaced your sequence of IR instruction by one “virtual” IR instruction): x = predicated_add %mask, %x, %y, %oldvalue This (actually, your sequence of selects, and add) would be matched during ISel to: vr0<def, tied1> = PRED_ADD mask_vr, vr1<use>, vr2<use>, vr3<use, tied0> >From here on the machinery is the same, the two-address pass would translate such instructions to: vr0 = vr3 vr0 = PRED_ADD mask_vr, vr1, vr2, vr0 If vr3 is not live after PRED_ADD coalescing will coalesce vr0 and vr3. I don’t think there is a fundamental difficulty handlin...

...diate (carry bit mask for v32i16) to r5 14 movr2vr.dup vr2, r5 // duplicate content of r5 into vr2 15 vand.u16 vr2, vr1, vr2 // vector and for element type 16 bit unsigned integer, vr2 has carry bits now 16 ldi r5, 0x7FFF7FFF // max number for 16 bit signed integer 17 movr2vr.dup vr3, r5 // duplicate r5 into vr3 18 vadd.s16 vr1, vr2, vr3, vpr0 // vpr0 has carry bits set now Each vector type has a different instruction sequence, because the bit mask and element type is different. I have tried to lower load/store for vpr in XXXISelLowering.cpp. But there is no guarantee tha...

...d your sequence of IR instruction by one “virtual” IR instruction): > > x = predicated_add %mask, %x, %y, %oldvalue > > This (actually, your sequence of selects, and add) would be matched during ISel to: > > vr0<def, tied1> = PRED_ADD mask_vr, vr1<use>, vr2<use>, vr3<use, tied0> > > From here on the machinery is the same, the two-address pass would translate such instructions to: > > vr0 = vr3 > vr0 = PRED_ADD mask_vr, vr1, vr2, vr0 > > If vr3 is not live after PRED_ADD coalescing will coalesce vr0 and vr3. I don’t think there is a fu...

...diate (carry bit mask for v32i16) to r5 14 movr2vr.dup vr2, r5 // duplicate content of r5 into vr2 15 vand.u16 vr2, vr1, vr2 // vector and for element type 16 bit unsigned integer, vr2 has carry bits now 16 ldi r5, 0x7FFF7FFF // max number for 16 bit signed integer 17 movr2vr.dup vr3, r5 // duplicate r5 into vr3 18 vadd.s16 vr1, vr2, vr3, vpr0 // vpr0 has carry bits set now Each vector type has a different instruction sequence, because the bit mask and element type is different. I have tried to lower load/store for vpr in XXXISelLowering.cpp. But there is no guarantee tha...

Hi,   For a custom target, there is a pass to perform memory dependence analysis, where, i need to get memory pointer for "load instruction". I want to check the pointer alias behavior. I am getting this by considering the memoperands for the load instruction.   For "load instruction", Machine Instruction dumps as below:   vr12<def> = LD_Iri %vr2<kill>, 0;

On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 8:10 AM, <dag at cray.com> wrote: > Jeff Bush <jeffbush001 at gmail.com> writes: > >> %tx = select %mask, %x, <0.0, 0.0, 0.0 ...> >> %ty = select %mask, %y, <0.0, 0.0, 0.0 ...> >> %sum = fadd %tx, %ty >> %newvalue = select %mask, %sum, %oldvalue >> >> I believe the generated instructions depend on whether

...my computer, and addresses on my network interfaces IS NOT from these networks. Main problem is, that mount_nfs failed on startup on this router because bind is not ready due to these errors and all system goes to single-user mode :( Computer is Soekris net5501, with 6 network interfaces (vr0-vr3 on board, em0 and ath0 attached). Only vr0 and vr1 are used, but adding fake addresses to vr2 and vr3 doesn't help at all. Also, mpd5 creates two NG interfaces (ng0 and ng1) on startup to connect to two providers. But previous installation (on faster hardware) doesn't show these errors...

...made more efficiently within the function using "Assign" or "<<-")? Be gentle. Although I've used SPlus and now R for more than a year, I've rarely needed to create functions that change specific attributes of an object. (I also do not have VR Programming or VR3 at my disposal right now). Thanks, =================================================== Dr. Marc R. Feldesman Professor and Chair Anthropology Department Portland State University Portland, Oregon 97207 email: feldesmanm at pdx.edu http://odin.pdx.edu/~h1mf Powered by Inspirochoerus "Ind...

I'm trying to understand how predicated/masked instructions can be generated in llvm, specifically an instruction where a set bit in the mask will write the new result into the corresponding vector lane in the destination and a clear bit will cause the lane in the destination to remain what it was before the instruction executed. I've seen a few places that suggest 'select' is the

Hi, I have a simple question. I have a variable with 3 levels. Variable A A A A A A B B B B B B C C C C C C I need to make a new vector renaming de levels B and C for D. NewVariable A A A A A A D D D D D D D D D D D D I dont find how to make it in manuals or in this list. Can anyone help-me??? Thank you Ronaldo -- Agnes' Law: Almost everything in life is easier to get into than out of.

...allows all later passes to handle they transparently. However, we do not want to do this before register allocation is complete. Otherwise it introduces new defs and uses of virtual registers and that mess up MachineRegisterInfo def-use chains. e.g. Now vr0 has two defs! defs: vr0<dead>, vr3, uses: vr1, vr2 ---------------------------- | vr0 = op1 vr1, vr2 | | vr3 = op2 vr0<kill>, #c | ---------------------------- 2. During register allocation, more identity copies will be eliminated while loads, stores, copies, re-materialized instructions will be introduced. It m...

...ater passes to handle they transparently. However, we do not want to do this before register allocation is complete. Otherwise it introduces new defs and uses of virtual registers and that mess up MachineRegisterInfo def-use chains. > > e.g. Now vr0 has two defs! > defs: vr0<dead>, vr3, uses: vr1, vr2 > ---------------------------- > | vr0 = op1 vr1, vr2 | > | vr3 = op2 vr0<kill>, #c | > ---------------------------- > > 2. During register allocation, more identity copies will be eliminated while loads, stores, copies, re-materialized instructions...

...allows all later passes to handle they transparently. However, we do not want to do this before register allocation is complete. Otherwise it introduces new defs and uses of virtual registers and that mess up MachineRegisterInfo def-use chains. e.g. Now vr0 has two defs! defs: vr0<dead>, vr3, uses: vr1, vr2 ---------------------------- | vr0 = op1 vr1, vr2 | | vr3 = op2 vr0<kill>, #c | ---------------------------- 2. During register allocation, more identity copies will be eliminated while loads, stores, copies, re-materialized instructions will be introduced. It m...

...his allows all later passes to handle they transparently. However, we do not want to do this before register allocation is complete. Otherwise it introduces new defs and uses of virtual registers and that mess up MachineRegisterInfo def-use chains. e.g. Now vr0 has two defs! defs: vr0<dead>, vr3, uses: vr1, vr2 ---------------------------- | vr0 = op1 vr1, vr2 | | vr3 = op2 vr0<kill>, #c | ---------------------------- 2. During register allocation, more identity copies will be eliminated while loads, stores, copies, re-materialized instructions will be introduced. It makes se...

...his allows all later passes to handle they transparently. However, we do not want to do this before register allocation is complete. Otherwise it introduces new defs and uses of virtual registers and that mess up MachineRegisterInfo def-use chains. e.g. Now vr0 has two defs! defs: vr0<dead>, vr3, uses: vr1, vr2 ---------------------------- | vr0 = op1 vr1, vr2 | | vr3 = op2 vr0<kill>, #c | ---------------------------- 2. During register allocation, more identity copies will be eliminated while loads, stores, copies, re-materialized instructions will be introduced. It makes se...

Hi, I am writing an analysis pass for a custom processor. I get an unusual situation where the code generated for a BB is BB#23: derived from LLVM BB %sw.bb99 Live Ins: %vr2 %vr0 %vr1 %vr9 %vr3 %vr8 %vr4 %vr5 %vr6 Predecessors according to CFG: BB#22 %vr46<def> = LD_Iri %LV, -4; mem:LD4[FixedStack0] %vr7<def> = ADDri %vr9, 1 %vr47<def> = ADDri %vr46, -4 ST_Iri %LV, -4, %vr47<kill>; mem:ST4[%cpArg.addr] >>> %vr48<d...

Hi: Is there any function in R to fit ordinal regression models (linear and non-linear) described by Peter McCullagh. Regression Models for Ordinal Data, JRSS-B, 1980, 42:109-142 Thanks, Venkat ----------------------------------------------------------------------- E. S. Venkatraman, Ph.D. Phone: (212) 639-8520 Fax: (212) 717-3137 Assistant Attending Member Memorial

...Cullagh. >> >> Regression Models for Ordinal Data, JRSS-B, 1980, 42:109-142 > >I dont't know this article, but... > >polr {MASS} R Documentation > Proportional Odds Logistic Regression > >described in detail, of course, in VR3 > >Peter > > >**I'd never join any club that would have the likes of me as a member.GM** >P.Malewski Tel.: 0531 500965 >Maschplatz 8 mailto: Peter.Malewski at gmx.de >************************38114 Braunschweig******************************** > >-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-....

...ata, JRSS-B, 1980, 42:109-142 >> > >> >I dont't know this article, but... >> > >> >polr {MASS} R Documentation >> > Proportional Odds Logistic Regression >> > >> >described in detail, of course, in VR3 >> > >> >Peter >> > >> > >> >**I'd never join any club that would have the likes of me as a member.GM** >> >P.Malewski Tel.: 0531 500965 >> >Maschplatz 8 mailto: Peter.Malewski at gmx.de >> >************************38114 Br...