Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "vq_best_sign".
Did you mean:
vq_nbest_sign
2004 Aug 06
2
patch for libspeex
...oom for some
> optimization there (mostly at higher --comp).
I'm still trying to figure out how it all works. If and when I do
figure out some optimisations, I'll forward them your way.
In the meantime, I've discovered I can gain another 10% speed
increase by declaring vq_nbest and vq_best_sign as inline. (They get
called so frequently, they may as well be). :)
Regards,
Bernard
--
Bernard Blackham
bernard at blackham dot com dot au
Australian Linux Technical Conference 2003: http://www.linux.conf.au/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
N...
2004 Aug 06
2
patch for libspeex
On Sat, Dec 14, 2002 at 01:46:19AM -0500, Jean-Marc Valin wrote:
> Thanks for the patch. I applied it and it give me up to 15% in speed.
> Doesn't seem to change the results, which is a good thing (though you
> originally forgot a "used=0" in vq_nbest_sign). I'll check a thing or
> two and I'll apply to CVS.
D'oh. My carelessness, sorry! :)
> Strange...