search for: vptech

I don''t remember if someone have posted this, but detailed spec is available for a while on http://www.intel.com/technology/computing/vptech/?iid=search& or more specifically for VT-x (the link is in the above page), ftp://download.intel.com/technology/computing/vptech/C97063-002.pdf Jun _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 d''morning listmembers, it''s about a few weeks now, i''m fiddling around with xen-unstable, patching, migrating compiling and even the hard job: learning the concept. by now, i''m wondering which testing environment you''re (well, some of you) using, to test the vt part of xen? even more strange, until now, no

I try pci pci passthrough with xen 3.3.1 and CentOS 5.2(64bit) on a SUPERMICRO C7X58 board I see the following the error in my boot log. (XEN) [VT-D]dmar.c:372: RMRR is incorrect. This problem is caused by this condition in dmr.c:372. if ( rmrr->base_address >= rmrr->end_address ) { dprintk(XENLOG_ERR VTDPREFIX, "RMRR is incorrect.\n"); return -EFAULT; } As an

I try pci pci passthrough with xen 3.3.1 and CentOS 5.2(64bit) on a SUPERMICRO C7X58 board I see the following the error in my boot log. (XEN) [VT-D]dmar.c:372: RMRR is incorrect. This problem is caused by this condition in dmr.c:372. if ( rmrr->base_address >= rmrr->end_address ) { dprintk(XENLOG_ERR VTDPREFIX, "RMRR is incorrect.\n"); return -EFAULT; } As an

Hi there! I was wondering what the general opinion on autotoolizing xen is? I am volunteering to do so, if there is interest in updating the build system to use autoconf, automake and/or libtool. Is one configure script for all of xen enough or do you want to be able to configure all/some tools separately? I know that Anthony is no fan of libtool... are there more reservations about some