search for: vpn_single_signon_with_samba_ad

I want to have samba be the back end provider for authentication to a radius server. I found https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/VPN_Single_SignOn_with_Samba_AD and wanted to see if this is 'current' and works with samba 4.1.8 -- or if anyone is using it. I want to use RADIUS authentication on a firewall and have Samba be the source for the user accounts. I am using a pfsense firewall. Anyone pointers would be greatly appreciated. -- David Bea...

...nning, if so, try stopping it temporarily. >> is Apparmor or Selinux running, if so, disable it temporarily. >> >> Rowland > > > Links: > ------ > [1] http://www.donelsontrophy.com Hi there appears to be a wiki page for that :-) https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/VPN_Single_SignOn_with_Samba_AD Rowland

Hai,   Im reading : https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/VPN_Single_SignOn_with_Samba_AD    I wanted to use the "msNPAllowDialin" , in ADUC tab "Dail-in"  but i notices this one was gone/ i was missing this one : https://wiki.samba.org/images/8/88/MsNPAllowDialin.jpg  Admin pc, windows 7 64bit, samba 4.7.3.  AD Reinstalled it with the needed dll's from a win2008...

...ADUC missing msNPAllowDialin and need > vpn advice for ad setup. > > On Thu, 14 Dec 2017 11:09:52 +0100 > "L.P.H. van Belle via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > Hai, > >   > > Im reading : > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/VPN_Single_SignOn_with_Samba_AD  > >   > > I wanted to use the "msNPAllowDialin" , in ADUC tab "Dail-in"  but i > > notices this one was gone/ i was missing this one : > > https://wiki.samba.org/images/8/88/MsNPAllowDialin.jpg Admin pc, > > windows 7 64bit, samba 4.7.3.  AD Reinst...

On 08/27/2015 04:52 PM, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 27/08/15 21:42, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> >> >> On 08/27/2015 04:37 PM, Rowland Penny wrote: >>> On 27/08/15 21:23, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 08/27/2015 04:18 PM, Marc Muehlfeld wrote: >>>>> Hello Jim, >>>>> >>>>> Am

I did a fresh install of Debian with the desktop. I know from Ubuntu that the network is handled differently in the desktop and the server versions. So, I am assuming it is a similar situation with Debian. I could be wrong but . . . When kerberos installs via the script it (the script) suggests accepting the 'defaults on the next three screens.' The first screen included the correct

On Fri, 2018-09-07 at 20:14 +0200, Luca Olivetti via samba wrote: > El 7/9/18 a les 17:59, Marco Gaiarin via samba ha escrit: > > > It is better to install squid/freeradius in the same host of a DC, or > > don't bother at all so they can be installed also on a DM? > > I don't know if it's better but I'm running freeradius with ntlm_auth on > a

Hai, It does not happen often but yes, i also need some help as i cant know everything also and im new with freeradius. Im working on a configuration for samba member + freeradius with ntlm_auth. Why ntlm_auth, because the next one is kerberos and ldap auth to configure.. I want to have some fallback options here and you have to start somewhere. This is running on my new proxy/gateway