search for: vpn0

...gured this setup would be ok. Is it? What else could be wrong? I figure this is a shorewall configuration problem as opposed to openvpn because VPN says i''m connected, and it''s displaying RWRW across the link. i have the following on both boxes: #interfaces# net eth0 loc br0 vpn0 tap0 #policy# loc vpn0 ACCEPT vpn0 loc ACCEPT loc net ACCEPT net all DROP and for a time i had all all ACCEPT but nothing. Any Clues? I need to have a bridge working because i need broadcast packets to cross the link. _________________________________________________________________ Need more...

Hi everybody, I have been using Shorewall for quite a while now but I recently stumbled over a new setup that stopped me cold. I don''t know how to proceed: I have an ordinary GNU/Linux box (2.6.11) connected to a nonpublic network with one interface eth0 which gets an IP through DHCP like 172.17.x.y. Traffic is not routed to the Internet in this subnet. In order to connect to the

...CP-Port 443. What do I have to add/change in my shorewall files to tunnel everything throug the VPNtunnel? Thanks a lot Bjoern My current shorewall config looks like this: #####Zones##### #ZONE DISPLAY COMMENTS net Net Internet loc Local Local networks vpn0 VPN0 OpenVPN TCP 443 dmz DMZ Demilitarized zone #####Interfaces##### #ZONE INTERFACE BROADCAST OPTIONS # net eth1 172.16.135.255 dhcp,blacklist,tcpflags,maclist loc eth0 10.0.123.255 dhcp vpn0 tun0 #####masq##### #IN...

Hi there, I would need some help with my configuration. I have tried a long time, but did not find my error. Thus I would really appreciate your help. There are three hosts: 1. h181 2. h182: Should ConnectTo h181 3. h183: Should ConnectTo h181 *Files under /etc/tinc/vpn0/hosts* [h181:] Address = 94.130.108.xxx Subnet = 172.16.1.1/32 -----BEGIN RSA PUBLIC KEY----- *** -----END RSA PUBLIC KEY----- [h182:] Subnet = 172.16.1.2/32 -----BEGIN RSA PUBLIC KEY----- *** -----END RSA PUBLIC KEY----- [h183:] Subnet = 172.16.1.3/32 -----BEGIN RSA PUBLIC KEY----- *** -----END...

I am looking at terminating a OpenVPN tunnel on my shorewall box, but selectivly forward incoming traffic from the VPN tunnel to various hosts on my LOC-zone. Is this doable? Or need I set up OpenVPN tunnels that terminates on the LOC-hosts in question directly? (Or rather: Which page on the web site have I neglected to read _this_ time?) Happy new year to one and all! .

I have been using shorewall and freeswan successfully for 3 or more years now. But they have all been using the Linux 2.4 kernel. My current configuration is (as the title suggests) using SuSE 9.1 which has a 2.6.5 kernel and freeswan 2.0.4 built-in. After much reading and a lot of trial and error, I did get this combination to work with Shorewall 2.0.9. It is happily talking to an older Mandrake

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I found out problems with dynamic add of hosts to zones. If somebody has idea how to fix it, please do tell. My head is not working on this on properly. Hope you get idea from this message. I''m trying to simplify this as much as possible to get problem clear. Problem is: Zones: vpn wlan net Interfaces: net eth0 wlan eth1 Policies: vpn all

...-> VPN Client -> Corporate network xenU -> xen0 bridge -> Internet xenU IP/DNS settings come from the local DHCP server. I would like to have: xenU -> xen0 bridge -> Corporate network I have tried (network-script ''network-bridge bridge=vpn_device'' e.g. vpn0 (as created by my vpn client) but it didn''t work. Any hints how to make this working for me? Thanks, Alexander. _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Hi, I have a small problem and any help appreciated. Tinc 1.0.33 Ubuntu 18.04 at Digital Ocean I need VPNs between 1 database server and two servers on separate networks: VPN0 works OK DB2 10.0.0.50/24 connects to Web1 10.0.0.1 Here is my ip r result: default via x.x.x.x dev eth0 proto static 10.0.0.0/24 dev tun0 proto kernel scope link src 10.0.0.51 10.15.0.0/16 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 10.15.0.10 10.130.0.0/16 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 10.130.17....

Hi everyone,   I am new to using tinc and currently trying to set up a full IPv6 mesh between 4 servers of mine. Setting it up went smoothly and all of the tinc clients do connect properly. Routing through the network works fine as well. There is however a large amount of management traffic which I assume should not be the case.   Here is a quick snapshot using "tinc -n netname top"

Hello, i run into trouble using tinc in switch mode. Its a simple setup with 2 hosts. Both running tincd 1.0.4 (Debian testing) Setup host A: Server, does not make connections to host B. The vpn0 interface is part of a Linux bridge, witch is ipv4 configured. Setup host B: Makes connections to host A, beside this its configured similar. Now it seems large packets can not be transmitted. I verified it step by step the way with tcpdump. A ping with a size larger then 1400 byte gets not re...