search for: vpf

..._begin(); BasicBlock* bb = BasicBlock::Create(context, "entry", f); IRBuilder<> builder(bb); Value* one = builder.getInt32(1); Value* v = builder.CreateAdd(one, arg); builder.CreateRet(v); ExecutionEngine* engine = EngineBuilder(module).create(); void* vpf = engine->getPointerToFunction(f); int32_t (*fp)(int32_t) = (int32_t (*)(int32_t))(intptr_t)vpf; int32_t out = fp(10); cout << "out is: " << out << endl; return 0; } I appreciate your help. Thanks, Nick -------------- next part -------------...

Stealth Communications Announces Registry to Avoid Access Fees Posted on: 04/23/2004 Stealth Communications Inc. today announced the official launch of a registry that allows service providers routing calls over the Internet to avoid paying local phone companies access charges. The VPF ENUM Registry allows carriers to map telephone numbers to IP addresses for such things as SIP phones and e-mail servers, Stealth announced at telx's Customer Business Exchange meeting in New York City. A phone call routed to a number listed in the registry would be terminated over the Internet,...

...that does not conform to the standard when we have a few VFP registers available but not enough. In that case, the beginning members of HA will be allocated to VFP, and the rest will go on stack. To fix the problem, it will be great if we can let the backend know the HA will be on stack and later VPF CPRCs will be on stack as well. There are some discussions on this, at least from the comments in TargetInfo.cpp: // This assumption is optimistic, as there could be free registers available // when we need to pass this argument in memory, and LLVM could try to pass // the argument in the free regi...

...dard when we have a few VFP registers available but not > enough. > > In that case, the beginning members of HA will be allocated to VFP, and the > rest will go on stack. > > To fix the problem, it will be great if we can let the backend know the HA > will be on stack and later VPF CPRCs will be on stack as well. > There are some discussions on this, at least from the comments in > TargetInfo.cpp: > // This assumption is optimistic, as there could be free registers available > // when we need to pass this argument in memory, and LLVM could try to pass > // the...

...m to the standard when we have a few VFP registers available but not enough. > > In that case, the beginning members of HA will be allocated to VFP, and the rest will go on stack. > > To fix the problem, it will be great if we can let the backend know the HA will be on stack and later VPF CPRCs will be on stack as well. > There are some discussions on this, at least from the comments in TargetInfo.cpp: > // This assumption is optimistic, as there could be free registers available > // when we need to pass this argument in memory, and LLVM could try to pass > // the argum...

...d when we have a few VFP registers available but not enough. >> >> In that case, the beginning members of HA will be allocated to VFP, and the rest will go on stack. >> >> To fix the problem, it will be great if we can let the backend know the HA will be on stack and later VPF CPRCs will be on stack as well. >> There are some discussions on this, at least from the comments in TargetInfo.cpp: >> // This assumption is optimistic, as there could be free registers available >> // when we need to pass this argument in memory, and LLVM could try to pass >&...

...few VFP registers available but not enough. >>> >>> In that case, the beginning members of HA will be allocated to VFP, and the rest will go on stack. >>> >>> To fix the problem, it will be great if we can let the backend know the HA will be on stack and later VPF CPRCs will be on stack as well. >>> There are some discussions on this, at least from the comments in TargetInfo.cpp: >>> // This assumption is optimistic, as there could be free registers available >>> // when we need to pass this argument in memory, and LLVM could try t...

...56f-799f-49ad-a64f-82eca3299b50/vdi [12866] 2012-05-23 04:23:29.119581 Adding tag to: c95af56f-799f-49ad-a64f-82eca3299b50 [12866] 2012-05-23 04:23:29.133845 Activate lock succeeded [12866] 2012-05-23 04:23:29.166975 ['/usr/sbin/td-util', 'query', 'vhd', '-vpf', '/mnt/c95af56f-799f-49ad-a64f-82eca3299b50.vhd'] [12866] 2012-05-23 04:23:29.173445 SUCCESS [12866] 2012-05-23 04:23:29.206198 PhyLink(/dev/sm/phy/42cbc4a3-dae2-e756-d122-01b87ed871c2/c95af56f-799f-49ad-a64f-82eca3299b50) -> /mnt/c95af56f-799f-49ad-a64f-82eca3299b50.vhd [...

On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Saleem Abdulrasool <compnerd at compnerd.org> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 9:09 AM, Damanjit Singh <dsingh at adobe.com> wrote: > >> Hi Saleem, >> >> Though a simple app works great I am facing few issues trying to link a >> slightly complex object file, generated via LLVM, with some libs generated >> via

Hello, This is the second version of this patch series. I only implement the VPF context switch support for arm32 and add dummy function to avoid compilation on arm64. I have switched the order of the patch because the old second one can be applied alone and the patch are cleaner :). For all the changes see each patch. Cheers, Julien Grall (2): xen/arm: don''t ena...