search for: vpcom

Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "vpcom".

Did you mean: xpcom
2017 Sep 20
2
RFC: [X86] Can we begin removing AutoUpgrade support for x86 instrinsics added in early 3.X versions
....pcmpeq.* - we have almost no test cases for this x86.sse2.pcmpgt.* - we no test cases for this x86.avx2.pcmpeq.* - we have no test cases x86.avx2.pcmpgt.* - we have no test cases for this x86.avx.vpermil.* - we do test this 3.2 added upgrade for: x86.avx.movnt.* - we have tests for this x86.xop.vpcom* - we have tests for this x86.sse41.ptest.* had its signature chagned and we upgrade from the old signature. We don't have tests for the old signature. x86.xop.vfrcz.ss/sd had an argument dropped that we upgrade for. We don't have any tests for the old signature. 3.3 had no upgrades 3.4 r...
2017 Sep 20
0
RFC: [X86] Can we begin removing AutoUpgrade support for x86 instrinsics added in early 3.X versions
...es for this > x86.sse2.pcmpgt.* - we no test cases for this > x86.avx2.pcmpeq.* - we have no test cases > x86.avx2.pcmpgt.* - we have no test cases for this > x86.avx.vpermil.* - we do test this > > 3.2 added upgrade for: > x86.avx.movnt.* - we have tests for this > x86.xop.vpcom* - we have tests for this > x86.sse41.ptest.* had its signature chagned and we upgrade from the old > signature. We don't have tests for the old signature. > x86.xop.vfrcz.ss/sd had an argument dropped that we upgrade for. We don't > have any tests for the old signature. > &g...
2017 Sep 20
2
RFC: [X86] Can we begin removing AutoUpgrade support for x86 instrinsics added in early 3.X versions
...mpgt.* - we no test cases for this >> x86.avx2.pcmpeq.* - we have no test cases >> x86.avx2.pcmpgt.* - we have no test cases for this >> x86.avx.vpermil.* - we do test this >> >> 3.2 added upgrade for: >> x86.avx.movnt.* - we have tests for this >> x86.xop.vpcom* - we have tests for this >> x86.sse41.ptest.* had its signature chagned and we upgrade from the old >> signature. We don't have tests for the old signature. >> x86.xop.vfrcz.ss/sd had an argument dropped that we upgrade for. We don't >> have any tests for the old si...
2017 Sep 21
3
RFC: [X86] Can we begin removing AutoUpgrade support for x86 instrinsics added in early 3.X versions
...for this > x86.sse2.pcmpgt.* - we no test cases for this > x86.avx2.pcmpeq.* - we have no test cases > x86.avx2.pcmpgt.* - we have no test cases for this > x86.avx.vpermil.* - we do test this > > 3.2 added upgrade for: > x86.avx.movnt.* - we have tests for this > x86.xop.vpcom* - we have tests for this > x86.sse41.ptest.* had its signature chagned and we upgrade from the old signature. We don't have tests for the old signature. > x86.xop.vfrcz.ss/sd had an argument dropped that we upgrade for. We don't have any tests for the old signature. > > 3.3 h...
2017 Sep 20
0
RFC: [X86] Can we begin removing AutoUpgrade support for x86 instrinsics added in early 3.X versions
....pcmpeq.* - we have almost no test cases for this x86.sse2.pcmpgt.* - we no test cases for this x86.avx2.pcmpeq.* - we have no test cases x86.avx2.pcmpgt.* - we have no test cases for this x86.avx.vpermil.* - we do test this 3.2 added upgrade for: x86.avx.movnt.* - we have tests for this x86.xop.vpcom* - we have tests for this x86.sse41.ptest.* had its signature chagned and we upgrade from the old signature. We don't have tests for the old signature. x86.xop.vfrcz.ss/sd had an argument dropped that we upgrade for. We don't have any tests for the old signature. 3.3 had no upgrades 3.4 r...
2017 Sep 22
0
RFC: [X86] Can we begin removing AutoUpgrade support for x86 instrinsics added in early 3.X versions
...es for this > x86.sse2.pcmpgt.* - we no test cases for this > x86.avx2.pcmpeq.* - we have no test cases > x86.avx2.pcmpgt.* - we have no test cases for this > x86.avx.vpermil.* - we do test this > > 3.2 added upgrade for: > x86.avx.movnt.* - we have tests for this > x86.xop.vpcom* - we have tests for this > x86.sse41.ptest.* had its signature chagned and we upgrade from the old > signature. We don't have tests for the old signature. > x86.xop.vfrcz.ss/sd had an argument dropped that we upgrade for. We don't > have any tests for the old signature. > &g...