search for: vp6npuwuwaxxdcugkyvkounr

Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "vp6npuwuwaxxdcugkyvkounr".

2018 Dec 04
2
[Unsafe-fp-math] Merge attribute for inlining
...pers mailing list llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.llvm.org_cgi-2Dbin_mailman_listinfo_llvm-2Ddev&d=DwMF-g&c=DPL6_X_6JkXFx7AXWqB0tg&r=VP6NpUwuwAXxdCugKYVKOuNr-I2x2_Cx1QkggUmrO9E&m=nJn7JadT9zarm-IAAqWE4edU5XSfeiXyjq-I8JYeBZE&s=uN17xN_M91org9jZEz_RmcsUYibXy91-9nuO0R0UvC8&e=> -- Hal Finkel Lead, Compiler Technology and Programming Languages Leadership Computing Facility Argonne National Laboratory -------------- next part --------------...
2018 Dec 04
2
[Unsafe-fp-math] Merge attribute for inlining
Hello dev, I have a question about unsafe-fp-math function attribute. Currently LLVM merges this attribute for inlining with logical AND. That means if caller has this attribute set but callee has not, LLVM will reset this attribute on caller. But shouldn't we respect this attribute on caller? If caller wants to perform unsafe fp operation, any code that gets inlined should be allowed to do