search for: vounteers

...http://src.braincells.com/dovecot-test/). Even though google turns up http://hemma.tobbe.nu/debian/mini-dinstall/incoming/dovecot_1.0.test46-1_i386.changes searching for dovecot on packages.debian.org (any distribution or source) only yields 0.99.14 and 0.99.20050712. I know Jaldhar called for vounteers to take over, but I don't feel qualified... but I've managed to do away with all non-deb installations, so if I have to I'll make a .deb myself, is there maybe an already-written script to do that with dovecot? Thanks for suggestions.

...within CMake itself (with some effort, of course). I lack the knowledge to judge the points you raise about distribution, package creation, etc. Finally, IMHO your concers about CMake not preserving as many [autotools] feautures as [it] can, does not apply to LLVM, at least as there is someone who vounteers to do the replication work :-) Please, some LLVM release manager (Tanya?), read Albert's web page and evaluate how much impact have the issues he raises on your work. -- Oscar

On Wed, 5 Mar 2025, Cedric Blancher wrote: > On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 at 21:22, Chris Rapier <rapier at psc.edu> wrote: > > > > > > > > On 3/4/25 05:34, Philipp Marek via openssh-unix-dev wrote: > > >> Does OpenSSH scp/sftp mode transfer sparse files correctly, i.e. are > > >> holes skipped and not transferred as chunks of 0 bytes? [1] > >

Duncan Sands wrote: > Do ordinary users need to have cmake if they want to build llvm? > If so, that's bad because they'll have to install it (unlike the > current setup, where only very standard tools are needed). That's not the only problem with cmake. The autotools may be a big and ugly beast, but that's because they're trying to solve a big and ugly problem for